The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Aerobic plus f

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in Italy

The Aerobic Plus/F is a laboratory equipment designed for microbial analysis. Its core function is to facilitate the growth and enumeration of aerobic microorganisms in various samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using aerobic plus f

1

Polymicrobial Blood Culture Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood specimens, from patients admitted to Pisa University Hospital (Italy) in the period January-July 2013, were inoculated into blood culture bottles [Plus Aerobic/F and Plus Anaerobic/F, or Peds Plus F (Becton Dickinson & Co, BD, Milan, Italy)], collected at the Unità Operativa di Microbiologia Universitaria, and transferred to the Bactec FX instrument (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for monitoring the bacterial growth. From each patient, only the first positive blood culture apparently monomicrobial at the Gram-stain was included in this study. Blood cultures containing Gram-negative bacilli from 133 patients or Gram-positive cocci from 87 patients were investigated. After subculture on blood agar plates (BD), 15 (11 %) of 133 and 7 (8 %) of 87 cultures were found to be polymicrobial and analyzed separately.
The study was notified to the local committee, Comitato Etico di Area Vasta Nord-Ovest, University of Pisa, and conducted in full accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Samples were taken as part of the standard patient care and used anonymously. For this type of study no written informed consent was necessary.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal CSF Infection Diagnostics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Throughout both study periods, the CHCO microbiology laboratory offered singleplex PCR testing for HSV-1 and 2 using the MultiCode-RTx HSV 1&2 Kit (Luminex, Austin, TX), EV using the Xpert EV kit on GeneXpert (EV; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA), and CLIA approved lab developed RT-PCR tests for HHV-6(24 (link)), CMV, VZV, and HPeV(25 (link)) following nucleic acid extraction and processing with Virus Minikits 2.0 (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) on the BioRobot EZ1. CSF was cultured on blood and chocolate agar plates, as well as in blood culture broth bottles (Plus Aerobic/F and PedsPlus/F [Becton Dickinson and Co, Sparks, MD]) incubated in a BacTec 9120/9240 automated system (Becton Dickinson and Co). MEP testing was performed in real-time on-demand 24 hours/day, 7 days/week with conditional testing occurring following CSF cell counts if WBC≥5uL. MEP was performed in a dedicated biosafety cabinet to reduce the risk of contamination. Positive results on MEP were repeated in duplicate before reporting to providers with discrepant results repeated a third time to adjudicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Monomicrobial Blood Culture Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood specimens from patients admitted to the Pisa University Hospital (Italy) in the period July-December 2014 were inoculated into BC bottles [Plus Aerobic/F and Plus Anaerobic/F, or Peds Plus F (Becton Dickinson & Co, BD, Milan, Italy)], collected at the Unità Operativa di Microbiologia, and transferred to the Bactec FX instrument (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for monitoring bacterial growth. From each patient, only the first positive BC apparently monomicrobial at the Gram staining was included in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Evaluation of Blood Culture Bottles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirteen different blood culture bottle types (i.e., broth) from three manufacturers (Becton, Dickinson, bioMérieux, Inc., and Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used. Clinical sample inclusion criteria were defined as residual inoculated blood culture bottles, which were flagged as positive in an automated continuous monitoring blood culture system with a readable Gram stain result exhibiting Gram-negative organisms. Samples were tested when prospective (fresh or frozen), within the time frame specified by the manufacturer (10 ), or retrospective (frozen blood culture broth samples from trial sites). Contrived samples were prepared in BD Bactec blood culture bottles (Plus Aerobic/F, Plus Anaerobic/F, Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F, or Peds Plus/F) as previously described (11 (link)– (link)14 (link)). For the prospective collection, exclusion criteria were defined as any fresh broth from positive blood culture bottle(s) from a patient that was already tested. (In the retrospective arm, two bottles from the same patient may have been tested if different types flagged positive [i.e., one anaerobic and one aerobic]). Bottles containing charcoal, and samples with insufficient volume to complete required testing were also excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fungal Infection Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood specimens and non-centrifuged peritoneal fluids obtained during surgery (one specimen/patient) were directly inoculated into two bottles of BACTEC media (PLUS aerobic/F and PLUS anaerobic/F; BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, USA), which were incubated for a maximum of 7 days, and analyzed using the automated continuous blood culture monitoring BACTEC FX system (BD Diagnostics). The broth was then sub-cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar with Chloramphenicol (SC) when yeast growth was observed. For colonization purposes, pharyngeal and anal exudates were inoculated in Brain Heart Infusion Broth incubated at 37 °C for 24 or 48 h, and then sub-cultured on SC. Urine specimens were directly streaked onto SC. Cultured yeasts were identified based on the macro-microscopic features of the culture, germ tube test, and biochemical tests (VITEK® 2 system bioMérieux, Inc. Hazelwood, MO, USA or API®/ID 32C bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France).
Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed using Sensititre Yeast One® (TREK Diagnostic Systems Ltd.). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results for all antifungals, except for amphotericin B, were interpreted by taking into account the species-specific clinical breakpoint suggested by the CLSI [9 ]. In accordance with the literature data, a breakpoint ≤1 μg/ml was selected for amphotericin B to define the isolates as sensitive (S).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Reducing PCR Cycles to Mitigate Blood Matrix Contamination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 4

Next Applicants evaluated 37-cycle PCR for all targets to reduce or eliminate contamination from blood matrix bottles. Three types of bottles were tested (Bactec Pediatric Plus/F, Bactec Aerobic Plus/F, Bactec Anaerobic Lytic/10) with and without blood.

Surprisingly, when PCR cycles are reduced from 40 to 37, most blood matrix contamination is eliminated. FIG. 13.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Reducing PCR Cycles to Eliminate Blood Matrix Contamination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 4

Next Applicants evaluated 37-cycle PCR for all targets to reduce or eliminate contamination from blood matrix bottles. Three types of bottles were tested (Bactec Pediatric Plus/F, Bactec Aerobic Plus/F, Bactec Anaerobic Lytic/10) with and without blood.

Surprisingly, when PCR cycles are reduced from 40 to 37, most blood matrix contamination is eliminated. FIG. 13.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Reducing PCR Cycles to Eliminate Blood Contamination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 4

Next Applicants evaluated 37-cycle PCR for all targets to reduce or eliminate contamination from blood matrix bottles. Three types of bottles were tested (Bactec Pediatric Plus/F, Bactec Aerobic Plus/F, Bactec Anaerobic Lytic/10) with and without blood.

Surprisingly, when PCR cycles are reduced from 40 to 37, most blood matrix contamination is eliminated. FIG. 13.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Reducing PCR Cycles to Mitigate Blood Matrix Contamination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 4

Next Applicants evaluated 37-cycle PCR for all targets to reduce or eliminate contamination from blood matrix bottles. Three types of bottles were tested (Bactec Pediatric Plus/F, Bactec Aerobic Plus/F, Bactec Anaerobic Lytic/10) with and without blood.

Surprisingly, when PCR cycles are reduced from 40 to 37, most blood matrix contamination is eliminated. FIG. 13.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!