The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

No 5 filter paper

Manufactured by Cytiva

No. 5 filter paper is a high-quality cellulose-based filtration medium designed for laboratory applications. It is characterized by consistent pore size, efficient filtration, and durability. The core function of No. 5 filter paper is to provide a reliable and effective means of separating solid particles from liquids in various laboratory procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using no 5 filter paper

1

Extraction of M. azedarach Leaf Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaves of the M. azedarach plant were prepared as previously described [29 (link)]. The leaves were thoroughly washed with distilled water soon after collection and blotted dry using a paper towel. Approximately 10 g of the leaves were cut into small pieces, transferred to a beaker containing 40 mL of 18 Mohm water, and heated to between 80 and 90 °C, with constant stirring for 15 min, until a green-colored liquid solution was noted. The leaf extract was filtered (Whatmann Filter paper no. 5) and stored in a freezer at −4 °C until further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Charcoal-Mediated Decolorization and Sugar Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pre-treated samples, and purified enzyme extract were mixed with activated charcoal (20:1 w/w) and then stirred for 2 days at ambient temperature with a magnetic stirrer. The samples were filtered through filter paper No. 5 (Whatman), after treatment with charcoal [31 (link)]. The filtrate was subjected to measurement of reducing sugars as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Photosynthetic Pigments and Anthocyanins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After germination, two grams of fresh leaves was homogenized using chilled mortar containing 10 mL of methanol (80% v/v) and some MgCO3. Sample extract was collected and filtered using the Buchner funnel through Whatman filter paper no. 5. Extract volume was topped up to 50 mL with methanol (80% v/v). Samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 minutes. Adsorption values were measured at 666 nm, 653 nm, and 470 nm using Shimadzu spectrophotometer. Contents of chlorophyll a (Ca), chlorophyll b (Cb), and total carotenoid were assessed based on the modified formulae by Lichtenthaler and Wellburn [11 ] based on micro g/g FW:
Ca=15.65A6667.340A653,Cb=27.05A65311.21A666,Cx+c=1000A4702.860Ca(129.2Cb/245).
For measurement of anthocyanin content, 0.1 g of samples was grounded in 3 mL of acidified methanol (99 : 1 of methanol : HCl). Samples were then centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 20 minutes and the supernatant was kept in the dark, at 4°C for 24 h. Absorbance was recorded at 550 nm, and anthocyanin content was calculated based on an extinction coefficient of 33000/Mol cm [12 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anthocyanin Quantification in Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anthocyanin concentration was determined by the pH differential method [56 (link)]. Approximately 2.5 g of unpolished rice was extracted for anthocyanin with 24 mL of 70% acidified methanol pH 1.0 and shaking for 60 min, then filtered with Whatman No. 5 filter paper and adjusted to a total volume of 25 mL with 70% acidified methanol pH 1.0 Each 2 mL of extracted solution was prepared with KCl 0.024 M pH 1.0 and CH3COONa 0.400 M pH 4.5. The absorbance was measured by spectrophotometer (Biochrom, Libra S22, Cambridge, England) at 520 and 700 nm wavelength.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying UV-B Absorbing Compounds and Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Levels of UV - B absorbing compounds were assessed as described previously.[25 (link)] Plant samples were placed in 25 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 5 ml of acidified methanol (MeOH: HCl: H2O, 90:1:1 (v/v)), and the contents of the flask were heated to 60°C and stirred at that temperature for 10 min before cooling to room temperature over 15 min and filtering through 90 μm filters. Concentrations of soluble UV-B absorbing compounds were estimated by measuring the absorbance of the filtrate at 300 nm using a spectrophotometer.
To assay for levels of phenolics, a 10% (w/v) homogenate was prepared in a methanolic HCl solvent (50% methanol, 0.05% concentrated HCl, approximate pH of 3.5) at room temperature. Extracts were acidified to an approximate pH of 1.0 by the addition of HCl (1 M). The precipitate was allowed to settle for 15 h in the dark and filtered through Whatman No. 5 filter paper. The absorbance of the supernatant solution was measured at 280 nm as described previously.[26 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fungal Biomass Extraction and Bacterial Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each fungal strain was inoculated into 200 mL potato dextrose broth (PDB) medium at 200 rpm on a rotary shaker at 28°C for 7–10 days. The fungal broth was filtered using Whatman No. 5 filter paper, and then the protein in filtrate was removed by the sevage method (Kusaikin et al., 2010 (link)). The mycelia was dried and then extracted twice with 95% ethyl alcohol (1:2/V:V) by circumfluence extraction (Cui et al., 2015 (link)). The bacteria was inoculated in beef extract-peptone medium at 200 rpm on a rotary shaker at 37°C for 48–72 h. All the extracting solution was concentrated in a rotary evaporator at 60°C and further was removed by evaporation under 40°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction and Purification of Azaspiracids from Mussels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dissected HP (150 g) from Bruckless mussels was freeze-dried to yield 40 g of dry tissue, which was extracted with EtOH (3 × 100 mL) in a Waring blender. The extract was filtered (Whatman no. 5 filter paper) and evaporated under vacuum at 35 °C. The residue was partitioned between EtOAc (150 mL) and 1.0 M NaCl (100 mL). The fractions from each step of the procedure were analyzed by LC-MS to verify the presence of AZAs and AZA-esters. The EtOAc fraction was evaporated under vacuum and the residue partitioned between hexane (50 mL) and 90% MeOH (50 mL). The methanolic fraction was evaporated under vacuum. The residue was applied to an open silica gel column (10 cm × 5.0 cm i.d.) packed with 10–40 μm silica gel (Millipore-Sigma) and sequentially eluted with hexane–EtOAc (9:1), EtOAc–MeOH (7:3 and 1:1), and MeOH (250 mL each). The 7:3 and 1:1 EtOAc–MeOH fractions were evaporated under vacuum separately, and dissolved in MeOH (10 mL) for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Plant Nutrient Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After harvesting at full maturity, the plant samples were dried, crushed, and sieved with a 2 mm sieve to collect fine powder to determine plant nutrient content. Plant macronutrients such as N, P & K were determined following the standard protocol of wet digestion. In brief, plant samples were digested in a 2:1 solution of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Different apparatus were used to determine these macronutrients according to previously standard procedures. For example, the Kjeldahl apparatus was used to determine plant nitrogen (N) content [37 ], a colorimeter was used to test phosphorus (P) in plants [38 (link)], and a flame photometer was used for potassium (K) content in plant samples (Hitachi Z-2000, Tokyo). The dry ashing method was used to evaluate plant micronutrients (e.g., Ca, Zn, Fe, Mn, and Mg). This process involved the ashing of plant materials for six hours at 550 °C, adding 5 mL of hydrochloric acid, and then gradually topping with distilled water to make a 25 mL solution. Plastic vials were used to retain the slurry after it had been filtered through the Whatman No. 5 filter paper. The standard curve of the atomic absorption spectrophotometer was used to determine the micronutrient content values (Hitachi Z-2000, Tokyo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Imaging Mycobacterium NTM and Ash Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NTM colony morphologies were imaged on a dissecting microscope at total magnification of 80X (Ken‐A‐Vision). Acid‐fast isolates were identified with Ziehl‐Neelsen staining and imaged by light microscopy at total magnification of 1,000× using a Laxco SeBa Pro 4 microscope.
SEM was performed on Kīlauea‐derived M. abscessus and Mycobacterium chelonae that were cultured with volcanic ash. NTM and ash cultures were prepared by inoculating 1 × 106 NTM cells into 1 ml 7H9 broth containing 1 mg of fine ash and incubated on a rotary shaker at 37°C for 48 hr. The NTM‐ash cultures were deposited onto Whatman No. 5 filter paper (2.5 μm) and fixed by submersion in 2.5% glutaraldehyde diluted with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Imaging and chemical analyses were conducted on a Tescan VEGA3 Variable Pressure SEM equipped with two Oxford Instruments XmaxN 150 mm2 silicon drift detectors for EDX.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Diplodia corticola Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diplodia corticola strains were isolated from holm and cork oak trees exhibiting dieback symptoms and cankers in Algeria. The strains were identified using multi-gene phylogenetic analysis, based on DNA sequence data of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) and translation elongation factor (tef1-α) [15 (link)]. Pure cultures of hyphal tipped isolates were maintained in the culture collection of the Mendeleum-Institute of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Lednice, Czech Republic. Stock cultures of selected strains were maintained on potato dextrose agar (Oxoid, Ottawa, ON, Canada) and mycelial plugs were used to inoculate 250 mL of Czapek Dox broth (Oxoid), added with 2% yeast extract in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. The cultures were incubated in the stationary phase in the dark at 25 °C. After 30 days, the liquid phase was separated by using filtration on Whatman No. 5 filter paper, and the culture filtrates and respective mycelia were stored at −20 °C. The experiments were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!