The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Widefield microscope

Manufactured by Nikon

The Nikon Widefield Microscope is a versatile lab equipment designed for high-quality imaging and observation. It provides a wide field of view, enabling users to examine larger samples with clarity and precision. The microscope's core function is to magnify and illuminate specimens, allowing for detailed visual analysis and exploration.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using widefield microscope

1

Transwell Assay for Cell Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasive capacities of SW837 and SW1463 cells were assessed by Transwell assay. To be more specific, 8.0-µm pore Transwells (EMD Millipore) were inserted into 24-well plates. The diluted Matrigel (Shanghai YASEN Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) solution (1:8) was added into the upper chamber of the basement membrane. After the Matrigel dried at room temperature, the cells (2×104) were resuspended with L-15 medium but without FBS and seeded into the upper chamber, and normal culture media was placed in the lower chamber. After 24 h of incubation, the cells on upper surface of the membrane were removed gently using cotton swabs, while the invaded cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and then stained using 0.05% crystal violet solution for another 15 min. A total of 5 randomly selected views were photographed under a wide-field microscope (Nikon Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comet Assay for Single-cell DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell comet assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Trevigen). Islets isolated from wild-type (WT), db/db and STZ treated mice were re-suspended in cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 2 × 105 cells/ml, mixed with low-melt agarose (1:10 ratio) and spread on frosted glass slides. After the agarose solidified, the slides were sequentially placed in lysis and alkaline solutions (Trevigen). Slides were then subjected to electrophoresis at 12 V for 10 min in 1X Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer, fixed with 70% ethanol, and stained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Nuclei were visualized using epifluorescent illumination under a 20X objective on a Nikon wide-field microscope and images were analysed with the NIH Image J program. DNA damage was quantified for 100 cells for each experimental condition by determining the percentage of DNA in tail using Comet Score (TriTek) software, using the formula % DNA in tail = (total intensity of tail / total intensity of comet) × 100. Mean comet tail DNA % was expressed as a percentage of the positive control, STZ (mean of three independent experiments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro Microneedle Skin Insertion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SR‐loaded or VAN‐loaded (100 µg) MN arrays were inserted into the skin. When using porcine skin, the MN arrays were inserted with thumb pressure or with the use of a spring applicator at 1.6 N force and 2 m s–1 while the skin was immobilized. In case of the human skin, MN arrays were applied with the use of the applicator. After insertion, skin samples were collected and frozen (−80 °C). The samples were embedded in optimal cutting temperature medium (OCT) and cut into sections (10 µm) via cryostat (ThermoFisher Scientific). Fresh human skin samples were stained with an anti‐collagen‐4 mouse (dilution 1:300, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and visualized with Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti‐mouse. Sections were mounted with mounting medium containing 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (Vector Laboratories). Bright‐field and fluorescence microscopy was performed with a widefield microscope (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing Transcriptional Regulation Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast strains containing either wild type MED14 or MED14-AID, copper inducible lacI-GFP and lacO repeat arrays inserted at either PERICEN, TEL, or ARM sites. Cells were grown in YPD + 200μM Cu2SO4, arrested in G1 with alpha-factor, IAA added, and released into nocodazole-imposed mitotic arrest. Cells were fixed briefly in 70% ethanol, DAPI stained, and imaged using a Nikon widefield microscope. Z stacks with 15 images at 0.1μm intervals were acquired and merged by maximum intensity projection. Percentage of cells showing 2 separate GFP foci was quantified using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Neuronal Populations in Confocal Images

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were collected on an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope or a Nikon Widefield microscope. For each quantified value, at least 3 different animals were sampled on 10 consecutive 12 µm sections. Quantification was then manually performed using the Cell Counter plugin of ImageJ. Data shown are expressed as the mean±s.e.m. and are presented in Fig. S1D. Normality tests were applied on datasets and appropriate t-tests were used in order to assess the statistical significance of the data. Significance values are ***P<0.001, **P<0.01, *P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Bacterial Nanosensor Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures of P. aeruginosa grown in LB were used to set up liquid cultures in 5 mL LB using 100 µL of the overnight culture. The cultures were grown to 0.4–0.8 OD600 and normalised to an 0.05 OD600 in 1 mL of minimal medium (M9 succinate). Nanosensors were suspended at 5 mg mL−1 in selected medium and filter sterilised using 0.22 µm PES filters. The BioFlux flow cell (BioFlux 200 48-well low shear plate, 0–20 dynes cm2) was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Fluxion Biosciences, BioFlux System). For the seeding of the cells, 50 µL of the normalised cells was used with a seeding time of 45–60 min. After the seeding, 1 mL of the prepared medium with or without nanosensors was used as flow medium. The flow was set to 0.25 dyn cm−2 and the system was run for 20–24 h. Time-lapse imaging was applied using a Nikon widefield microscope with brightfield and fluorescence channels (OG-FAM excitation = 460 nm, TAMRA excitation = 550 nm). Images were taken every 15 min for 16 h.84
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mitochondrial Dynamics in Drosophila Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flies were homozygous (GH146-Gal4) or heterozygous (all other) for the Gal4 driver and UAS-mitoTimer (Laker et al., 2014 (link)). They were raised in mixed populations of ∼20 flies at 25°C in 12h/12h day/night light cycle conditions, and flies of different ages were assayed the same day side by side. The brains were dissected in ice-cold PBS and imaged immediately (without fixation), using a Nikon widefield microscope equipped with a 20x/0.75NA water immersion objective and GFP and dsRed emission filters. The acquisition settings were kept the same for all brains of one genotype, and the same exposure times were used for both channels. For each defined fluorescent soma (or lobe region for the mushroom body/OK107-Gal4), size and average red and green fluorescence were determined using Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)). Background was subtracted from fluorescent values, and the ratio of green and red fluorescent mitoTimer was calculated for each soma (value green/(value red + value green)100). To compare single channel intensities per cell, values were normalized to the cell’s size. For display, all images across one genotype and fluorescence color are scaled equally. Mushroom body beta prime lobes were not analyzed, as they could not be distinguished unambiguously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Neuronal FRET Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements were taken on the Nikon spinning disc confocal microscope using CFP (445 nm excitation, 482/35 nm emission) and FRET (445 nm excitation, 540/30 nm emission) channels, acquiring images with a 40X (NA 0.95) air objective at 300 ms exposure, EM multiplier 300, 10 MHz camera readout speed, 20% laser power, and binning pixels 2 × 2. Measurements were also taken on the Nikon widefield microscope using CFP (434/16 nm excitation and 470/24 nm emission) and FRET (434/16 nm excitation and 535/20 nm emission) channels, acquiring images with a 20X (NA 0.75) or 40X (NA 0.95) air objective at 4–600 ms exposure, EM multiplier 300, 1 MHz camera readout speed, with a neutral density filter (ND8) restricting lamp light to 12.5% maximum.
Neuron cultures (DIV 10–14) were washed and put in RNIM at least ten minutes prior to imaging. Baseline measurements were obtained for 5–15 minutes. Calibrations were performed by adding 10 µM TPA for 2–5 minutes, followed by wash out with RNIM and addition of 10 µM ZnCl2/0.5–2 µM pyrithione. Measurements were taken for several minutes after a maximum FRET ratio was reached. For KCl stimulation experiments, KNIM was mixed 1:1 with RNIM and measurements were taken for 400–600 seconds before washing out with RNIM and performing a calibration as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Tumor Microvessel Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor sections were imaged in an upright Nikon widefield microscope using a 10x objective (0.30 NA), and a gain of 1. Between 1–3 non-overlapping regions of interest (ROI) were obtained per sample, and in each ROI areas for segmentation were labeled as Nestin-positive (brown), background, or tissue (blue). The segmentation of each ROI was performed using the Trainable WEKA Segmentation from Fiji [43] (link). Between 1 to 4 regions of each label per ROI were manually selected and used to train the algorithm, followed by testing on the whole image. In each ROI, microvessel density (MVD) was quantified as the percentage of Nestin-positive area relative to total tissue area [41] (link). Additional details can be found in the Appendix.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorometry Imaging of TRPM7 Ca2+ Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorometry was done on an inverted Nikon widefield microscope. A 63x oil immersion lens was used, in combination with a 34°C stage heater. The microscopy medium was kept at a pH of 7.2, using HBS (HEPES buffered saline). This buffer contained 10 mM glucose, 2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM KCl, 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM HEPES. The excitation of the Cyan Fluorescent Protein (CFP) was set at 425 nm. CFP and Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) emissions were measured simultaneously using band-pass filters at 470±20 and 530±25 nm respectively. Ca2+ measurements were done using FRET biosensors and chemical dyes. The Ca2+ FRET sensor Twitch-2B was used. Also, the Ca2+ dyes Oregon Green 488 BAPTA-1-AM and Fura Red-AM were used. No quantitative differences could be detected between these methods, with respect to the TRPM7 Ca2+ signals. Before the experiments the FRET ratio was set at 1.0 and a baseline was recorded. After the Ca2+ experiments a calibration was done adding ionomycin (10 μM) and a high dose of Ca2+ (CaCl2, 10 mM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!