The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using camedia c4040

1

Stomatal Density and Aperture Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To estimate the density and stomatal aperture area measurements, three plants from each replicate (nine plants of each treatment) were selected. Measurement and scoring were performed on third leaf from the apex of each plant. One sample of epidermal cells was obtained from the lower surface (abaxial side) by the nail varnish technique [79 (link)]. A small area of abaxial side of leaves was covered with a thin layer of clear nail polish and placed on glass slide and left to dry after drying the leaves samples removed and observed through a light microscope (BX60, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany), equipped with a digital camera (Camedia C4040, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) [80 (link)]. Stomata density and stomatal aperture area were measured with the AnalySIS® 3.2 software program for image analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (3×104) were seeded on coverslips for 24 h, the invasive/stemness phenotype was experimentally induced as explained above, after which cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde 4% for 10 min, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min. Cells were blocked for 1 h and then stained overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-E-cadherin (1:100, Clone: 36/E-cadherin, BD Biosciences. ref. 610181), rabbit monoclonal anti-vimentin-Alexa Fluor-594 (1:1000, Clone: EPR3776. ref. ab154207), rabbit polyclonal anti-Oct4 (1:100, ref. ab18976) or rabbit polyclonal anti-Sox2 (1:100, ref. ab97959); all antibodies were from Abcam. After that, cells were incubated for 30 min with the secondary antibodies: goat anti-mouse-IgG-FITC (1:500 Sigma-Aldrich Co., ref. F0257) or donkey anti-rabbit-FITC (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, ref. 711-095-152). Finally, nuclei were stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride; Thermo Fisher Scientific, ref. D1306) for 25 min. Cells were observed using a fluorescence microscope Olympus BX51 and images were acquired with a digital camera (Camedia C4040, Olympus). FITC staining intensity was quantified using the Image Pro Plus software, and the integrated optical density (IOD) of green cells was obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microscopic Evaluation of Capillary Cell Distribution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the cell distribution (and behavior over the time) inside the capillaries, they were deposed on a normal glass slide and observed (with 4× up to 20× magnification) by means of a BX51 Olympus microscope (Olympus GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) equipped with a standard epifluorescence system. Up-right illumination was performed by a Mercury arc lamp (Osram HBO 100/2, Osram GmbH, Augsburg, Germany). For best HO observation, the excitation band was selected by a Band Pass Filter (BP366) and reflected by a dichroic mirror (DM 400), whereas the emitted fluorescence was selected by means of a barrier Long Pass Filter (LP) 450 nm. For best PI observation, the green excitation band was selected by an Interference Band Pass Filter (BP 530–560 nm) and reflected by a dichroic mirror (DM 590), whereas the emitted red fluorescence was observed thanks to a barrier Long Pass Filter (LP) 620 nm. Capillaries with RBCs were observed and monitored by means of the same microscope operated in a standard bright field mode. Sample images were taken at various magnifications with the Olympus Camedia C-4040 digital camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining of Epithelial and Mesenchymal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3 × 104 cells of each of the cell lines were seeded on coverslips for 24 h in their respective media. Then, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min. Cells were blocked with blocking buffer (10% goat serum, 1% BSA, 0.2% triton X-100, and PBS 1X) for 1 h and then stained with the primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-E-Cadherin antibody (Clone: 36/E-cadherin; BD Biosciences, San José, CA, USA), rabbit monoclonal anti-Vimentin antibody-Alexa Fluor-594 (Clone: EPR3776; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), overnight at 4°C. After that, cells were incubated with the secondary antibody goat anti-mouse-IgG-FITC antibody (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min. Nuclei were stained with DAPI for 25 min. Cells were observed using a fluorescence microscope Olympus BX51, and images were acquired with a digital camera (Camedia C4040, Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (3×104) of each of the primary isolates were seeded on coverslips for 24 h, fixed with paraformaldehyde 4% for 10 min, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min (both from Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA, ref. P6148-500G and T8787-100 ML, respectively). Cells were blocked with blocking buffer [10% goat serum (Sigma, ref. G9023-10ML), 0.2% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA (bovine serum albumin, Sigma, ref. A1933), in PBS 1X] for 1 h, after which, cells were stained with mouse monoclonal anti-E-cadherin antibody (1:100, 610181, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and with rabbit monoclonal anti-vimentin antibody-Alexa Fluor-594 (1:2000, ab154207, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4°C. Cells were then incubated with a goat anti-mouse-IgG-FITC antibody for 30 min (1:50, F0257, Sigma-Aldrich Co.). Finally, nuclei were stained with DAPI (H1200, Vector Laboratories, Youngstown, OH, USA) for 25 min. Cells were observed using a fluorescence microscope Olympus BX51 and images were acquired with a digital camera (Camedia C4040, Olympus, Segrate, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pepper Leaf Anatomy Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf anatomy was measured on the fully expanded second leaves from five pepper seedlings at a similar position for each replication each treatment [46 ] on 28 DAT. Leaf segments of 5 mm × 5 mm were taken from the central leaf blade next to the main vein, fixed with formalin-acetic acid-alcohol (FAA) fixative, dehydrated in an alcohol and xylene series, embedded in paraffin, cross-sectioned to a thickness of 10 μm, and stained with red-solid green. The total thickness of the whole leaf and the thickness of the upper epidermis, lower epidermis, PT and SPT were measured under a transmission light microscope (DP71, Olympus Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Images were collected using a digital camera (Camedia C4040, Olympus Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed by AnalySIS 5.0 (Olympus Inc., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histomorphometric Analysis of Bone Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Undecalcified sections of 30 intact samples from each group were prepared. The histomorphometric examination was performed as described by our previous study [16 (link)]. The specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol of 70% to 99% for 10 days, and embedded in methylmethacrylate (Technovit 7200VLC; Heraeus Kulzer GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany). The 50 μm thick sagittal sections were prepared using an electric diamond saw and grinding system (Exakt; Exakt Vertriebs, Norderstedt, Germany) and stained with toluidine blue. Digital images of the sections were obtained using a digital camera (Camedia C4040; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) attached to an Olympus BX50 microscope (Olympus) at a magnification rate of 2x (Figures 4 and 5). The images were transferred to a personal computer, and a standardized measurement area (2 × 2 mm) was outlined in the middle of the condylar bone. Bone volume, trabecular width, trabecular thickness, trabecular separation, and node/terminus ratio measurements were made using histomorphometry software (TAS, version 1.2.9; Steve Paxton, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK). The nomenclature and calculations for bone histomorphometry were applied in accordance with the report from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Leaf Anatomy Characterization for Plant Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At harvest, mature leaves were sampled from five plants per treatment, fixed in a 38% formaldehyde, glacial acetic acid, 50% ethanol solution (5:5:90 by volume) and prepared for microscopy according to standard protocols (De Micco et al., 2011 (link); Carillo et al., 2020 (link)). In brief, subsamples of leaves were dehydrated and embedded in the acrylic resin JB4 (Polysciences, Hirschberg, Germany) and thin sectioned (5-μm thick) through a rotary microtome. The cross sections, stained with 0.5% Toluidine blue in water, were observed through a transmitted light microscope (BX60; Olympus, Hamburg, Germany). Digital images were captured (Camedia C4040; Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) and subjected to digital image analysis (AnalySIS 3.2; Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) to quantify the following traits: the thickness of leaf lamina, palisade, and spongy parenchyma, the quantity of intercellular spaces in the palisade parenchyma (in six regions per section). Another set of subsamples of leaves was devoted to peeling, and microphotographs of epidermal strips of the upper and the lower lamina surfaces were analyzed to quantify the following stomata traits: stomata frequency (number of stomata per mm2 in three regions per peel) and stomata size (length and width of the guard cells in 10 cells per lower epidermis peel).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!