The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using αcd16 32

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometry for Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood cell suspensions were prepared as described above and incubated with the FC blocking antibody α-CD16/32 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA; [5 μg/ml]) for 10 min. The cells were subsequently incubated with the following antibody panel for 25 mins. on ice: α-F4/80-AF488 (AbD serotec, Oxford, UK; [0.5 μg/ml]), α-CD115-PE (Biolegend, San Diego, CA; [1 μg/ml]), α-CD11b-PE/Cy7 (Biolegend; [0.5 μg/ml]), α-Ly6C-PerCP/Cy5.5 (BioLegend; [0.5 μg/ml]), α-Ly6G-APC (BioLegend; [1 μg/ml]), α-CD3e-APC (eBioscience; [1 μg/ml]), α-CD19-APC (eBioscience; [1 μg/ml]), α-CD49b-APC (eBioscience; [1 μg/ml]), and DAPI (Sigma; [0.1ug/ml]). Samples were stained concurrently with fluorescence minus one (FMO) antibody panels. Following a series of washes, the cells were resuspended in MACS buffer, and sorted on the BD Influx Cell Sorter (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ). FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., v.9.2, Ashland, OR) was used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Phenotyping of Mouse Peritoneal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse peritoneal cells were collected via a peritoneal cavity wash with 10 mL of PBS-5% FCS. Single-cell suspensions were prepared in FACS buffer (PBS + 0.5% BSA + 2 mM EDTA). Fc receptors were blocked with αCD16/32 (1/40 dilution, ref: 14-0161-82, eBioscience) prior to the application of the following cocktail: viability dye eFluor450 (ref: 65-0863-14, eBioscience), anti-mouse SiglecF-APC (dilution 1/40, clone S17007L, ref: 155508, Biolegend) and anti-mouse Ly6G-FITC (dilution 1/40, clone RB6-8C5, ref: 11-5931-82, eBioscience) or their matched isotype controls using a fluorescence-minus-one method. Samples were fixed in FACS buffer containing 0.5% PFA and shipped at 4 °C to UK. All multi-labelled cell samples were subsequently acquired using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) and analysed on FlowJo Software (Supplementary Fig. 7). OneComp eBeads (eBioscience) were used to optimise antibody staining panels and apply compensation. For compensation controls, optimal PMT voltages for the positive signal to be detected were set within 104 and 105 whereas negative signal was set to below 102.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes or lymph node cells were extracted into single cell suspension in 1× PBS, and RBCs lysed by incubation in ACK lysis buffer (Biofluids), single cell suspensions were passed through 100 µm cell strainer (BD Falcon). Cells were washed and FcγRII/III blocked with αCD16/32 (eBiosciences). Surface markers were stained with fluorochrome‐conjugated mAbs toCD3, CD4, CD69, CCR7, IL7Rα, CD62L, CD44, CD45, CD103, CD25, CD8α, CD11b, CD11c, CD19, CD62L, CD80, CD86, CD117 (c‐kit), DX5, F4/80, MHC Class II (I‐A/I‐E), (eBiosciences, BD Pharmingen, Biolegend, AbD Serotec). Treg cells were further stained by intracellular staining of Foxp3 with a kit according to manufacturer's instructions (eBioisciences). Samples were acquired on the LSR II quad‐laser cytometer running FACSDiva (BD Immunocytometry).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Mouse Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry analysis, single cell suspensions were made from mouse spleen by gentle dissociation or from mouse hearts by perfusing for 3 min with 1× PBS + 0.5% FBS, and digested in gentleMACS C Tubes according to manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). Viability was determined by LIVE/DEAD staining according to manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). Cells were blocked with α-CD16/32 (eBioscience), and surface markers were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated mAbs (eBioscience, BD, and BioLegend). Samples were acquired on the LSR II cytometer running FACSDiva 6 (BD). Data were analyzed with FlowJo 7.6 (Tree Star). For FACS isolation, single cell suspension from mouse heart or spleen was first purified with a 20–80% Percoll (GE Healthcare) gradient to eliminate dead cells and debris. Cells were then stained with fluorochrome-conjugated mAbs (eBioscience, BD, and BioLegend) and sorted with a MoFlo Cell Sorter (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were prepared in FACS buffer (PBS+0.5%BSA+2mMEDTA). Fc receptors were blocked with αCD16/32 (eBioscience). Live/dead cell differentiation was undertaken with fixable viability dye efluor 450 as per manufacturer’s instructions (eBioscience). Cell staining was undertaken utilising specific labelled anti-mouse antibodies or their matched isotype controls using a fluorescence-minus-one method. Intracellular staining was done following permeabilisation buffer treatment (eBioscience). using a zenon Alexa Fluor 488 Rabbit IgG labelling kit as per manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). All multi-labelled cell samples were subsequently acquired using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) and analysed on FloJo Software (S9S11 Figs; also see supplementary methods). OneComp eBeads were used to optimise antibody staining panels and apply compensation. For compensation controls, we applied optimal PMT voltages for the positive signal to be detected within 10^4 and 10^5 whereas negative signal set to be below 10^2. Compensation matrices were applied in which there was <40% overlap in any signal combination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!