The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using facs aria 2 or 3

1

Immunophenotypic Characterization of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell surface marker staining, cells were collected, washed once with PBS supplemented with 2% FCS (FACS buffer). Cells were incubated with anti CD34 (#343516581), CD90 (#3281145E10) and EPCR (#351906) (BioLegend) antibodies for 30 minutes (min) at 4°C, and washed once with cold FACS buffer. For cell sorting, CD34+ cells were quickly thawed and stained for CD34, CD38 (#345806), CD45RA (#560362) (BD Bioscience) and CD90 following the same procedure as above. When specified, cells were stained with the Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (BD Bioscience). All data were collected on FACS Canto II or LSRII analyzer (Becton Dickinson), and analyzed with FlowJo software. Cells were sorted on a FACS Aria II or III (Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before analysis or sorting, cells were labeled with different combinations of the following fluorochrome–conjugated antihuman antibodies: CD14 (HCD14), CD19 (HIB19), CD3 (UCHT1), CD33 (P67.6), CD34 (8G12), CD38 (HIT2), CD45 (HI30), CD45RA (HI100), CD49f (GoH3), CD90 (5E10), CD133 (13A4), and CD71 (L01.1). Dead cells were excluded with 7-aminoactinomycin D (7AAD, Sigma Aldrich). Apoptotic cells were stained with the Annexin V apoptosis detection kit, according to manufacturer’s protocol (BD Bioscience). All data were collected on fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) Canto II or LSRII analyzer (Becton Dickinson) and analyzed with FlowJo software. Cells were sorted on a FACS Aria II or III (Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry or cell sorting, cells were transferred to 15-mL tubes and washed in cold buffer (2% FCS, 2 mM EDTA in PBS). Before antibody labeling, cells were incubated with Fc-Block (1:200, anti-CD16/32 antibody; 2.4G2, BD Pharmingen) for 10 min at 4°C and washed. Cells were stained in buffer with (1:100) fluorescently labeled antibodies against CD11b (clone M1/70, BD Pharmingen), CD11c (clone N418, Biolegend), CD115 (clone AFS98, eBioscience), CD19 (clone 1D3, BD Pharmingen), and Ly-6G (1A8, Biolegend) for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. 7-AAD (BD Pharmingen) was added before measurement to exclude dead cells. Analysis was performed on LSRFortessa and sorting on FACSAria II or III (BD Pharmingen). Unstained, empty vector-transduced cells or fluorescence-minus-one staining setups served as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Analysis of Lymphocyte Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions of spleen, mesenteric lymph nodes (mLNs), or various subcutaneous lymph nodes (scLN) (Schallenberg et al., 2010 (link)) were prepared using 70 μm cell strainers (BD Biosciences). mAbs to CD4 (RM4–5, GK1.5), CD25 (PC61, 7D4), CD62L (MEL-14) and Thy1.1 (OX-7), as well as Fc receptor–blocking mAbs to CD16/32 (93) and Pacific Blue- and APC-conjugated streptavidin were obtained from eBioscience or BD Biosciences. The mAb to TCR-HA107–119 (6.5) was purified and conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen) in our laboratory according to standard protocols. Before FACS, for some experiments, CD4+ CD25+ cells were enriched using biotinylated mAbs against CD4 or CD25, respectively, streptavidin-conjugated microbeads and the AutoMACS (Miltenyi Biotec). Samples were analyzed on a LSR II or sorted using a FACSAria II or III (BD). Data were analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

NP-Ficoll Immunization of Transferred B Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 × 106 CD45.1 B1-8hi naive B cells were transferred into B6 mice, which were then immunized i.v. with NP-Ficoll on the next day. Donor B cells were magnetically enriched from pooled spleens of recipient mice using APC-conjugated anti-CD45.1 and anti-APC MicroBeads (130-090-855; Miltenyi Biotec), with the MACS system (Miltenyi Biotec). After enrichment, cells were further stained with respective Abs and sorted using FACSAria II or III (BD Biosciences) as shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1A. Rv-transduced donor B cells were enriched as described above and sorted as shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification of 2C-like and ESCs by FACS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with room temperature sterile PBS, trypsinized and re-suspended in ice-cold sterile 0.5% BSA PBS solution. Sorting was performed using a BD BioSciences FACS Aria II or III. During sorting, cells were collected in culture medium and kept at 4 °C during the sort. Analysis of FACS data was performed using the FlowJo software and the same gatings were used for all replicates of a same experiment. Cells were not index sorted and the purity of the sort was estimated at 96% for 2C-like and 97% for ESCs. A control flow profile for wt ESCs is shown in Supplementary Figure 1c. For the Rex1 experiments, the Rex1- gate was defined based on the fluorescence of WT ESCs and the Rex1high gates were defined based on the fluorescence of Rex1-GFP cells cultured in 2i. FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences) was used to quantify the population of eGFP-positive cells. Cells that had been frozen in 2i were thawed and the Rex1 sorting was performed 4 days after 2i withdrawal. For data presented in Figure 7a, the 2C::turboGFP and Zscan4c::mCherry cell line was FACS sorted just before transfection and the 2-cell-like cells or Zscan4::mCherry positive cells were removed respectively from the population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Purification of 2C-like and ESCs by FACS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with room temperature sterile PBS, trypsinized and re-suspended in ice-cold sterile 0.5% BSA PBS solution. Sorting was performed using a BD BioSciences FACS Aria II or III. During sorting, cells were collected in culture medium and kept at 4 °C during the sort. Analysis of FACS data was performed using the FlowJo software and the same gatings were used for all replicates of a same experiment. Cells were not index sorted and the purity of the sort was estimated at 96% for 2C-like and 97% for ESCs. A control flow profile for wt ESCs is shown in Supplementary Figure 1c. For the Rex1 experiments, the Rex1- gate was defined based on the fluorescence of WT ESCs and the Rex1high gates were defined based on the fluorescence of Rex1-GFP cells cultured in 2i. FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences) was used to quantify the population of eGFP-positive cells. Cells that had been frozen in 2i were thawed and the Rex1 sorting was performed 4 days after 2i withdrawal. For data presented in Figure 7a, the 2C::turboGFP and Zscan4c::mCherry cell line was FACS sorted just before transfection and the 2-cell-like cells or Zscan4::mCherry positive cells were removed respectively from the population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sorting and Isolation of Colon Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For patients with biopsies spanning multiple regions, descending colon and sigmoid-rectum cell suspensions were combined in equal numbers to provide an aggregate analysis of the lower colon. Cells stained with viability dye (0.4–0.6 × 106) were resuspended in 100 μL of FACS wash buffer (FWB; PBS, 2%FBS, 1 mM EDTA) with the addition of the following antibodies: TruStain FcX (Biolegend 422302), CD3-PE/Dazzle (Biolegend 300450), CD45-Pacific Blue (Biolegend 304022), CD66b-PE/Cy7 (Biolegend 305116) and CD15-APC (Biolegend 301908). Cells were incubated on ice for 20 minutes, washed with 1 mL FWB, and then resuspended in 500 μL FWB for sorting on a FACS Aria II or III (BD Biosciences). For the majority of samples, 12–15 × 103 live CD45+CD66b mononuclear cells (MNC) cells and CD3+ cells (pre-gated on live MNC) were separately sorted into T cell media (RMPI + 10% FBS) and immediately transferred to ice. CD66b+ granulocytes were excluded from the analysis because these cells interfere with scRNA-seq using the 10X Genomics protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Intestinal Lymphocyte Isolation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymphocytes from lamina propria (LP) and intraepithelium were isolated as described above. Peyer’s patches (PP), inguinal lymph nodes (iLN), mesenteric lymph nodes (mLN), and spleen (Spl) were isolated, and erythrocytes were lysed with ACK lysis buffer (155 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 1 mM EDTA). Single cell suspensions were stained with primary antibodies for CD3, CD8α, CD8β, CD62L, CD103, TCRγδ, TCRβ, B220, CD11b, and F4/80. To evaluate IgA-producing cells, cells were stained with biotin-conjugated anti IgA antibody, followed by Streptavidin-PE. In some experiments, IELs (CD3+CD8α+TCRβ+ or TCRγδ+ cells) and intestinal epithelial cells (CD103-EpCAM+ cells) were sorted by a FACS Aria II or III (BD Biosciences) from isolated intestinal epithelium. All analyses were performed on a FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences) with FlowJo Software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunophenotyping of Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HSC (CD150+ CD48- Lin- Sca-1+ c-Kit+) or HSPCs (Lin- Sca-1+ c-Kit+) were sorted by FACS AriaII or III (BD) and fixed with 4%PFA. Cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton for 15min and stained with anti-Tomm20 (ab78547 or ab289670) 1:200 or anti-ssDNA (18731, IBL) 1:50. Secondary stains were performed with anti-rabbit-AF488 1:1000 or anti-rat-AF488 1:1000. DAPI 1:1000 or 7-AAD 1:200 were used for nuclear staining. Data correction was performed with Mark-II (Amnis) and analysis was performed with IDEAs software (Amnis).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!