The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using n alkane

1

GC-FID and GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The essential oils were analyzed using GC–FID and GC–MS. The analysis was conducted using an Agilent 7990 B gas chromatograph equipped with a 5988A mass spectrometer and a HP-5MS (0.25 mm i.d., 30 mL, 0.25 μm f.t., 5% phenyl methyl polysiloxane). The following oven temperature was used: 5 min at 60 °C, then up to 240 °C with the rate of 3 °C min−1, held for 10 min. Helium (carrier gas) flow rate was 1 mL min−1; the injector split ratio was 1:30; the mass range and electron impact (EI) were 400 m/z and 70 eV, respectively. The identification of constituents was performed using the procedure explained by Morshedloo et al.60 (link), which is based on the interactive combination of linear retention indices (RIs), calculated respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes (Supelco, Bellefonte, CA), and the mass spectrum (MS) matching with commercial libraries (ADAMS, WILEY 275 and NIST 17). GC-FID analysis was performed using an Agilent 7990 B gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID), capillary column VF 5MS (30 mL, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.50 μm f.t., 5% phenyl methyl polysiloxane). The same oven temperature reported for GC–MS was used. The injection volume of the essential oil was 1 μL the essential oil in n-hexane (1:100). Quantification of the constituents was performed by peak area normalization without using correction factors61 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GC-MS Analysis of Rice Volatile Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The profile of volatile compounds from the rice extract was determined using GC-MS (Model 6890N/5973, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA). The GC-MS temperature program started from 45 to 250°C with a rate of increase of 3°C/min, and held for 30 min. A capillary column HP-5MS with dimensions of 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. and 0.5 μm film thickness was used. The injection port temperature was set at 250°C. Purified helium gas was used as the carrier gas with the flow rate of 1.3 mL/min. The GC injector was in a split mode with a 1:10 split ratio. The MS condition was operated in the electron impact (EI) mode with ionization voltage of 70 eV and the ion source temperature was set to 230°C. The MS quadrupole temperature was 150°C and mass scan was in the range of 45 -550 amu. The volatile compounds were tentatively identified by matching their mass spectra with reference spectra complied in NIST05 and Wiley7n mass spectral libraries. The structures of these volatile compounds were confirmed by linear retention index (RI) using n-alkanes (Supelco) as the reference. This experiment was done in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent 6890/5975C GC‐MS system equipped with HP‐5 ms column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness; J&W Scientific) was used to analyze volatile compounds that accumulated on the SPME fiber. The carrier gas was helium with splitless mode, which was delivered at a linear velocity of 1 ml/min. The desorption time was 5 min in the injection port at 250°C. The temperature was programmed to be hold at 35°C for 3 min and increased to 280°C at a rate of 5°C/min. The mass selective detector was operated in the electron impact ionization mode at 70 eV, in the scan range m/z 40–400. The interface temperature was 230°C, and the retention time of each volatile was converted to the Kovats retention index using n‐alkanes (Sigma, Co.) as references. The volatile compounds were tentatively identified by matching the mass spectra with the spectra of the reference compounds in both the Wiley mass spectra (MS) library (8th edn) and the NIST/EPA/NIH MS library (version 2.2a) and verified on the basis of mass spectra obtained from the literature and comparison of Kovats retention indices with those reported in the literature. Finally, identification accuracy was determined by separating relevant standard compounds through GC‐MS analysis under the same conditions (Dong et al., 2013).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chemical Composition Analysis of Plant Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each chemical component of the two oils (Table 1) was identified by comparing the corresponding mass spectrum with the spectra contained in the Adams [33 ] and NIST 08 [34 ] libraries, as well as by comparing the calculated linear retention index (LRIexp) with the literature [30 ,31 (link),32 (link),33 ,34 ,35 (link)]. Each LRI was calculated relative to a homologous series of standard n-alkanes (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy, No. CE 203-777-6), from n-octane (C8) to n-tricosane (C23), according to the van Den Dool and Kratz method [29 (link)]. The identification of most oil components was confirmed by coelution with authentic standards (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Phytochemical Analysis of Licorice Root

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole plant of LR was collected from the Inner Mongolia of China. ALT and AST kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). Acetonitrile and methanol (LC-MS grade) were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Shanghai, China). Bicyclol tablets and formic acid (analytical grade) were purchased from Daxing Biomedicine Industrial Park (Beijing, China) and China Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), respectively. Carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na) and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) were purchased from Xilong Scientific Co., Ltd. (Shantou, China). N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA), methoxyamine hydrochloride, ammonium acetate, luteolin, n-alkanes, and pyridine were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). HP-20 macroporous resin was purchased from Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). Deionized water was produced by the Milli-Q water system (Bedford, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

GC-MS Analysis of Compound Elution Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solutions of 23 compounds were prepared at an approximate midpoint of the calibration range, in a model wine solution containing tartaric acid (0.008 M), potassium hydrogen tartrate (0.011 M), and ethanol (5% v/v) to confirm the compound elution times and ion profiles. Samples (10 mL) were transferred to the heater block set at 50 °C with an agitation rate of 250 revolutions per minute (rpm) and allowed to equilibrate for 1 min. A 23 gauge 50/30 µm divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was preconditioned at 270 °C for 60 min, before insertion into the GC injector. Mass spectral data was collected in selective ion monitoring (SIM) at an ionization voltage of 70 eV. The final elution profiles were confirmed by matching mass spectral data with the NIST mass spectral search program (version 2.0, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and Kovat’s retention indices (RIs). RIs were checked for each compound using a commercial mixture of n-alkanes (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), an identical oven ramp profile, and gas flow rates, as used for the final analyses. This formula was used to calculate RI [23 ]:

RI = relative index of compound i;

z = carbon number of the alkane z;

tR(i), tR(z), and tR(z+1) = retention times of the compound i, the compound z, and the alkane z + 1, respectively.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cuatro Ciénegas Lippia graveolens Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lippia graveolens was collected from Cuatro Ciénegas, Coahuila de Zaragoza (26°59′ N 102°03′59″ OE), México. The specimens were identified in the Herbarium of the School of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, México. Methanol, acetone (Tedia, Fairfield, OH, USA), and isopropyl alcohol (Chromadex, Los Angeles, CA, USA) were of HPLC grade. Purified water was from a Milli-Q water-purification system (Veolia, Boston, MA, USA). The standard solution n-alkanes (C8–C20, C22, and C24), myrcene (≥99.5%), p-cymene (≥97%), carvacrol (≥98%), anethole (99%) GC grade, and sodium alginate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. Eudragit L100-55 polymer (1:1 methacrylic acid: ethyl acrylate) was purchased from Evonik Industries, Essen, Germany.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Analytical Standards Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The standards for gallic acid (GA), (+)–catechin (C), (−)–epicatechin (EC), (−)–epigallocatechin (EGC), (−)–gallocatechin gallate (GCG), (−)–epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), (−)–epicatechin gallate (ECG), and caffeine were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). The mixture of amino acids standards was purchased from Sykam (Munich, Germany). n–Alkanes were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). Aroma standards including ethyl decanoate (99 %), benzaldehyde (99.5 %), octanal (99 %), benzyl alcohol (99.5 %), phenylacetaldehyde (95 %), linalool (98 %), nonanal (96 %), terpineol (95 %), geraniol (99 %), (Z)–3–hexenyl hexanoate (98 %), β–ionone (97 %), cedrol (98 %), and methyl jasmonate (98 %), were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Aroma standards including hexanal (98 %), (Z)–3–hexenyl acetate (97 %), linalool oxide mixture (97 %), 2–phenylethyl alcohol (98 %), methyl salicylate (99 %), indole (99 %), (Z)–jasmone (92 %), α–ionone (90 %), nerolidol (97 %), and (Z)–3–hexenyl benzoate (98 %) were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., ltd (Tokyo, Japan). Aroma standard ocimene (90 %) was purchased from Yuanye Company (Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Volatile Compound Identification and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The volatile compounds were identified considering both MS patterns and linear retention indices (LRIs). Mass spectra were compared to those available in the NIST14 libraries. The LRI values were determined and calculated by using n-alkanes (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI, USA) as standards [15 (link)]. The compound with match quality ≥80 was regarded as identified if the difference between the calculated and published LRI values was <20. The identified compounds were subsequently quantified by five-point external standard curves [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oil Constituents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical composition of EOs was analyzed according the conditions described in our previous works [51 (link), 52 (link)]. For each compound, the Kovats retention index (RI) was calculated relative to a standard mix of n-alkanes between C9 and C31 (Sigma-Aldrich Co.). Identification of constituents was performed by comparison of RI and MS spectra with those reported in the literature and by computer matching with standard reference databases (NIST98, Wiley275, and CNRS libraries).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!