The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using x omat processor

1

Plasmid Profiling and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmid profiling was performed according to previously described methods [24] (link). Plasmid incompatibility (Inc) groups were determined by PCR with the following primers: HI1, HI2, I1-Iγ, X, L/M, N, FIA, FIB, W, Y, P, FIC, A/C, T, FIIAs, F, K, and B/O [25] (link).
Southern hybridization was performed as follows. Probes were prepared by PCR. Probes for blaCTX-M-2 and blaCTX-M-14 were prepared using a CTX-M consensus primer set [26] (link). The probe for blaCMY-2 was prepared using primers described by Pérez-Pérez and Hanson [21] (link). These PCR products were labeled using a PCR DIG Labeling Mix (Roche Diagnostic, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmid DNA was separated by 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis at 100 V for 70 min. The DNA in the gel was transferred to a positive membrane (Roche Diagnostics) by the capillary method. Pre-hybridization (>30 min) and hybridization (>16 h) were performed using Easy Hyb solution (Roche Diagnostics) under high-stringency conditions, and digoxigenin (DIG) in the hybrids was detected using a DIG Luminescent Detection Kit (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A hyper MP film (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was exposed to the membranes for 2 min at room temperature and developed in a Kodak X-Omat processor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detecting Salmonella enterica via Bacteriophage Probe

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A DNA fragment containing the ST104 bacteriophage region was amplified from DT104 with the ST104F and ST104R primers (Table 1). The PCR product was purified using a QIAquick® Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and labeled with digoxigenin (DIG)-11-deoxyuridine triphosphate by random priming using a DIG-High Prime DNA Labeling Kit (Boehringer GmbH, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The labeled PCR product was then used as a probe for Southern hybridization analyses. After PFGE of agarose plugs, genomic DNA from S. enterica strains was transferred to positively charged membranes (Boehringer) by capillary action. Prehybridization (>30 min) and hybridization (>16 h) were performed in DIG Easy Hyb Solution (Boehringer) under high-stringency conditions, and hybrid detection was achieved with a DIG Luminescent Detection Kit (Boehringer), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Hybridization products were detected by exposing Hyperfilm MP (Amersham International, Little Chalfont, UK) to the membranes for 1–10 min at room temperature. Films were developed in a Kodak X-Omat processor (Rochester, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Soft X-Ray Imaging of Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soft X-ray imaging was performed using a CMB-2 X-ray irradiation apparatus (SOFTEX). Mice were placed on X-ray films (FUJIFILM) and exposed to X-irradiation at 55 kV and 25 mA for 2 s. The irradiated films were developed using a Kodak X-Omat Processor (Kodak).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Extraction and Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with ice-cold 1× PBS and then harvested with the help of cell scrapers. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in 1× PBS, followed by another centrifugation. Subsequently, pellets were lysed with RIPA buffer with freshly added protease and phosphatase inhibitors (1× EDTA-free Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, 10 mM sodium fluoride, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). Lysates were incubated on an end-to-end rotor at 4 °C for 1 h. The cell lysate was centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C to clear cell debris. The supernatant (containing the proteins) was transferred to a fresh tube and protein estimation was carried out using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Protein lysates were boiled for 7 min after the addition of 4× protein sample buffer and run on an SDS-PAGE gel, followed by immunoblotting using ECL reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA). The blots were exposed to X-ray films and developed using a Kodak X-OMAT processor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples were prepared as described in Native PAGE section above, mixed with 2x Laemmli buffer, and boiled for 5 min. Twenty μg of whole cell lysates or 1 μg of affinity-purified chaperone-bound complexes was loaded onto 10% Bis-Tris SDS-PAGE gels. Electrophoresis was conducted for 1 hr at room temperature.
For immunoblotting, a SDS-PAGE gel, or a native PAGE gel was transferred to a PVDF membrane. The PVDF membrane was incubated in 20 mL blocking buffer (TBST; Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20) containing 5% non-fat dry milk, for 1 hr. The membrane was washed twice for 10 min each using TBST. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer, and were incubated with the membrane for 1 hr, followed by two washes using TBST as above. The HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:3000 dilutions in blocking buffer) was incubated with the membrane for 1 hr, followed by two washes using TBST. PVDF membranes were subjected to enhanced chemiluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Western Blot Chemiluminescence Reagents Plus) and were developed using Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP Imager. Prior to acquiring a ChemiDoc MP Imager, immunoblots were developed using a Kodak X-OMAT processor and X-ray films (Figures 1D, 2F, 3A, and S1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples were prepared as described in Native PAGE section above, mixed with 2x Laemmli buffer, and boiled for 5 min. Twenty μg of whole cell lysates or 1 μg of affinity-purified chaperone-bound complexes was loaded onto 10% Bis-Tris SDS-PAGE gels. Electrophoresis was conducted for 1 hr at room temperature.
For immunoblotting, a SDS-PAGE gel, or a native PAGE gel was transferred to a PVDF membrane. The PVDF membrane was incubated in 20 mL blocking buffer (TBST; Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20) containing 5% non-fat dry milk, for 1 hr. The membrane was washed twice for 10 min each using TBST. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer, and were incubated with the membrane for 1 hr, followed by two washes using TBST as above. The HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:3000 dilutions in blocking buffer) was incubated with the membrane for 1 hr, followed by two washes using TBST. PVDF membranes were subjected to enhanced chemiluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Western Blot Chemiluminescence Reagents Plus) and were developed using Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP Imager. Prior to acquiring a ChemiDoc MP Imager, immunoblots were developed using a Kodak X-OMAT processor and X-ray films (Figures 1D, 2F, 3A, and S1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phospho-Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Array

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in 3D as described above, lysed, and protein concentration in each sample was measured by the Micro BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific #23235). Three hundred milligrams of protein were analyzed using the Human Phospho-Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Array Kit (R&D Systems, ARY001B) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Array membranes were incubated with chemiluminescence detection solution, exposed to HyBlot CL autoradiography film (Thomas Scientific #E3012), and developed using a Kodak X-Omat processor (Kodak).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Protein Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were separated using 8 % or 10 % SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred onto Hybond P membrane (GE Healthcare) and detected using either a mouse monoclonal anti-HA antibody (HA.11, Covance), a mouse monoclonal anti-α-tubulin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), a polyclonal goat UPF1 antibody (Bethyl Laboratories), an affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal UPF3B antibody (Abgent), a mouse monoclonal GAPDH antibody (Pierce) or a rabbit monoclonal β-III Tubulin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology). Horseradish peroxidase coupled secondary anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technology and horse radish peroxidase coupled secondary anti-goat antibodies from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Proteins were detected using ECL or ECL plus chemiluminescence reagents (GE Healthcare) and visualised using X-ray film and developed using an X-Omat processor (Kodak) or using a Thermo Scientific My ECL imager. The images produced were analysed using ImageJ software or Image Studio Lite software (LI-COR Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!