The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Uct s160

Manufactured by United Imaging
Sourced in China

The UCT S160 is a compact and versatile lab equipment designed for precision analysis. It features a high-performance scanning system and advanced optical components to deliver accurate and reliable results. The core function of the UCT S160 is to provide precise measurement and characterization capabilities for various scientific and research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 protocols using uct s160

1

Longitudinal Chest CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline chest CT scans and follow-up examinations were performed using the following 5 scanners: 64-detector row scanner (Brilliance, Philips, Cleveland, OH, USA), 256-detector row scanner (Revolution CT, GE, Waukesha, WI, USA), 128-detector row scanner (Ingenuity core128, Philips, Suzhou, China), Discovery CT750HD CT scanner (GE, Waukesha, WI, USA), and a 16-detector row scanner (uCT S160, United Imaging, Shanghai, China). In the supine position, patients were scanned at the end of inspiration during a single breath hold. The high resolution (HR)CTs were performed with collimation of 0.625–1.25 mm, pitch of 0.64, section thickness of 0.625–1.25 mm without overlap, matrix of 512×512 or 1,024×1,024, field of view (FOV) of 350–400 mm, 120 kVp, and 220–300 mA. All imaging data were reconstructed using the standard algorithm. Follow-up scans were performed to track the therapeutic effectiveness for pneumonia or stability of lung nodules. The mean interval between baseline CT examinations and follow-up scans were 354 days [mean time, 354±224 (SD) days; range, 30 to 1,351 days].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

AI-Assisted Lung Tumor Segmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients whose CT images taken prior to treatment were unavailable were excluded from both data sets. The included CT images were obtained with scanners manufactured by Siemens (Somatom Definition AS+, Biograph64), Philips (Brilliance 40, iCT256, Ingenuity Flex, MX 16-slice), GE Medical System (Bright Speed), and United Imaging (uCT 510, uCT 760, uCT S-160). All images were reconstructed using slice thickness of 0.6, 1, 1.25, 2, 3, or 5 mm.
Two thoracic radiologists (TTW and YY) independently reviewed all scans. Assigned marks were determined by the consensus of the third thoracic radiologists (XWS). The region of interest annotation was performed with 3D slicer (http://www.slicer.org) for each lesion.32 (link) The 3D centre-of-mass location was marked, and a bounding box was constructed to include the whole tumor.
Before training the model, we first normalized the CT images to eliminate radiographic differences between images acquired with different scanners. Afterwards, we generated new data by moving the bounding box marked by the doctors. This data augmentation operation provided new training samples for the model and helped reduce the errors introduced by the doctor’s annotation. Detailed data augmentation methods are described in online supplementary appendix 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!