The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using clearfil ceramic primer plus

1

Titanium-Polymer Bonding Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
K-Etchant (K-Etchant Syringe, Lot: 2Q0056, Kuraray Noritake, Co., Ltd. Kurashiki, Japan) was applied to the surfaces to be cemented and allowed to function for 5 s, followed by water rinsing for 10 s and air-blasting for 5 s. Thereafter, Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Lot: 1W0023, Kuraray Noritake, Co., Ltd. Kurashiki, Japan) was brushed on the titanium and Telio CAD or MFH with a disposable brush and the surfaces were air blasted for 5 s. With the mixing tip, Panavia V5 Paste (Panavia V5 Paste Lot: 1R0010, Kuraray Noritake, Co., Ltd. Kurashiki, Japan) was applied to the polymer-based cementation surface. The surfaces were cemented together under constant pressure of 15 N, cement excess was removed, and all surfaces were light-cured for 20 s from each four sides. The specimen was removed and light-cured from above for an additional 60 s to finally self-cure for 3 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bonding Zirconia Veneers to Composite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Before cementation, the zirconia specimens were abraded with airborne particle for 10 seconds with 50-mm alumina at 0.2 MPa. Then, the specimens were water-rinsed and air-dried. A primer containing silane and MDP (Clearfil Ceramic Primer plus; Kuraray Noritake Dental) was applied to all the pretreated ceramic surfaces for 20 seconds, followed by air thinning for 10 seconds. A tooth primer (Kuraray Noritake Dental) was applied to substrate surfaces for 20 seconds, followed by air thinning for 10 seconds. Then, five different shades of resin cement (Panavia V5 Kuraray American Inc.) were directly applied between the ceramic veneer with 0.5- and 0.7-mm thicknesses and composite substrate as follow: Universal, Clear, Brown, White and Opaque. Compressive pressure (250 gr) was applied on the ceramic slices for 10 seconds using a universal testing machine and then polymerized with a light-curing unit (LITEX 680A Curing Light, Dentamerica) at 500 mw/cm2 for 120 seconds (each Incisal, Body, and Cervical layer for 40 seconds) (Figure 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Adhesive Bonding of Dental Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Table 1 lists the adherent materials used in this study, including commercially pure (CP) titanium grade 4 (Ti), Ti-6Al-4V alloy (Ti-6Al-4V), and tetragonal polycrystalline zirconia (zirconia). The three materials were cut into plates (10 mm × 10 mm × 1 mm) and polished using emery paper up to #600. The polished Ti, Ti-6Al-4V, and zirconia plates were ultrasonically cleaned using distilled water and air dried before characterization. The polished zirconia plates were subjected to alumina air-abrasion with 50-μm particles using an airborne particle abrader at a pressure of 0.3 MPa for 15 s, which was followed by characterization.
Table 2 lists the luting materials, including Super-Bond paired with the Super-Bond PZ Primer (Sunmedical Co., Ltd), and Panavia V5 paired with the Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Zirconia Abutment Coping Luting Technique

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 30 zirconia abutment copings with a luting space of 30 µm were luted with resin composite cement (group RC30). For this purpose, the titanium bases were screwed onto implant analogs (K 3010.4300, Camlog Biotechnologies AG, Basel, Switzerland) to protect the interface. The shoulders of the titanium bases and screw channel openings were covered with adhesive wax to protect them from blasting sand. The luting surfaces of both the titanium bases and the zirconia abutment copings were blasted with 50 µm aluminum oxide and a pressure of 1.5 bar. Subsequently, the components were thoroughly cleaned with oil- and water-free compressed air. The bonding surfaces were conditioned with primers for at least one minute, namely the titanium bases with Alloy Primer (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Okayama, Japan) and the zirconia abutment copings with Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Osaka, Japan). Pastes A and B of the luting composite (Panavia F 2.0, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Osaka, Japan) were then mixed in a ratio of 1:1 and applied to the surfaces to be luted. After joining the components, the excess was removed, and an oxygen inhibitor (Oxyguard II, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Osaka, Japan) was applied in the screw channel and at the luting space. After a setting time of 20 min, the specimens were finished and polished.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Composite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bonded specimens were kept in water at 37°C for 24 h. The top surface of the CAD/CAM resin slab was treated with 37% phosphoric acid (K-etchant) for 5 s, rinsed with water and air-dried. A silane coupling agent (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was applied to the surface and gently air-dried. A bonding agent (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was applied to the surface, gently air-dried, and light cured for 10 s. Then, a direct resin composite (Clearfil AP-X Shade A2, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was incrementally built up to a thickness approximately 2 mm high for the μTBS test. Each tooth was cross-sectioned longitudinally with a low-speed diamond saw (Isomet) to produce beam-shaped specimens with an approximate surface area of 1×1 mm 2 at the bonded interface. Before the μTBS test, the dimensions of each beam were determined with a digital caliper (Mitutoyo CD-15C). After this, each specimen was secured to a customized microtensile jig with a cyanoacrylate glue (Model Repair II Blue, Dentsply-Sankin, Tokyo, Japan) and placed in the testing apparatus (EZ-SX, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) for the μTBS test at a 1 mm/min crosshead speed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Micro-Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the investigations, all the specimen surfaces were applied with a 10-MDP containing primer (Clearfil™ Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake Inc., Okayama, Japan). After placing polyethelene tubes (Tygon®, Norton Performance Plastic, OH, USA) with an internal diameter of 0.8 mm and a height of 0.5 mm on the zirconia surface, resin cement (Panavia™ V5, Kuraray Noritake Inc., Okayama, Japan) was subsequently injected into the tube and light cured for 20 s from the top surface using a light-curing unit (Bluephase® N, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). All specimens were stored in 37 °C distilled water for 24 h. After carefully removing the tubes, the specimens were subjected to μSBS testing using a universal testing machine (Instron® 5566, Illinois Tool Works, MA, USA) using the wire-loop technique at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The materials used are listed in Table 1. The μSBS data were analyzed statistically with one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Zirconia-Ceramic Implant Bonding Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The intaglio surface of the zirconia FDPs of all groups were air-particle abraded with 50 μm aluminum-oxide at a pressure of 2 bar prior to adhesive bonding. Prosthetic restorations were subsequently cleaned with 70% ethanol for 3 min in an ultrasound bath (Bandelin Sonorex, Bandelin, Berlin, Germany), followed by the application of an MDP-containing primer (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake).
Polymer-infiltrated ceramic “tabletops” of Group RL were etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid (Vita Ceramics Etch, Vita Zahnfabrik) for 60 s, cleaned with water and dried with oil-free air and then a primer (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus) was applied. PICN “tabletops” were then adhesively bonded with a self-curing composite cement (Panavia V5 opaque, Kuraray Noritake) to the air-particle abraded and MDP pretreated occlusal surface of the corresponding 3Y-TZP zirconia framework. The MDP Primer (Clearfil Ceramic Primer) was also applied to the zirconia implants.
Afterwards, all zirconia FDPs were bonded with a self-curing composite (Panavia V5 opaque) to the one-piece ceramic implants. To allow a complete polymerization of the adhesive interface, all specimens were put in distilled water at 37 °C in an incubator (Universalschrank UF 55, Memmert, Schwabach, Germany) for 24 h [33 (link)]. Table 2 summarizes the pretreatments and resin cementation of all tested materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Adhesive Resin Cementation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before cementation, airborne particle abrasion protocol (50 mm alumina particles for 10 seconds at 0.2 MPa) was performed. After abrasion, ceramic surface was treated by a single bottle MDP-based adhesive primer (Clearfil Ceramic Primer plus; Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan). To simulate the clinical scenario for cementation, tooth primer was applied to the composite resin substrate surface (Tooth Primer, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) in accordance with manufacturer's instruction [21 (link)]. 45 specimens of each thickness were further divided into 5 groups (n = 9), and dual cure adhesive resin cement (Panavia V5, Kuraray Noritake, Tokyo, Japan) in five shades of clear, universal, white, brown, and opaque was applied between the treated surface of ceramic specimen and composite resin substrate. Compressive pressure of 250 gr was applied for 10 s in order to obtain similar thickness of resin cement using universal test machine (Hounsfield 5K, England) 2. The cement was irradiated with a light polymerization device (LITEX 680A Curing Light, Dentamerica, USA) for 40 s in each layer of incisal, body, and cervical (Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Resin Core Fabrication Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Impression with silicone rubber impression materials (EXAFINE putty type and EXAFINE injection type, GC, Tokyo, Japan) was performed after root canal preparation, and each tooth was temporarily sealed with temporary sealing material (Temporary Stopping, GC) after impression and stored in water for 24 h at 37 °C. Plaster models were made with plaster material (NEW FUJIROCK, GC), and resin cores were fabricated with resin core material (Clearfil DC Core Automix, Kuraray Noritake Dental) on the plaster models. Resin cores were alumina-blasted with Adabrader (Morita, Tokyo, Japan) for 10 s and dried with an air blow followed by silanization with Clearfil ceramic primer plus (Kuraray Noritake Dental) for 10 seconds and air blow-dried. The root canals were rinsed and dried in the same manner as in the Direct/DC group. Clearfil DC Bond was applied to the root canals for 10 s, and excess adhesive in the coronal side of the root canal was removed using paper points and light-cured for 10 s. Resin cores were cemented with Clearfil DC Core Automix, excess resin was removed, and then light-cured for 40 s. After light-curing, the specimens were stored in water for 24 h at 37 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Block on Dentin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, experiments were conducted on the assumption that a CAD/CAM resin block would be used for restorative treatment on the dentin surface after formation. For this purpose, the CAD/CAM resin block and the dentin surfaces were contaminated with immersion in artificial saliva for 60 s, and the microtensile bond strengths were measured and compared. CAD/CAM resin blocks (KATANA AVENCIA Block Universal, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was bonded to the dentin surface of a crown that had been polished with #600-grit silicon carbide paper using PANAVIA V5. The KATANA AVENCIA Block was cut to a thickness of 6 mm, and the flat surface was polished with #400-grit silicon carbide paper to form the standard roughness of adherend surface. After immersion in artificial saliva for 1 min, rinsing with water for 30 s, drying for 10 s, and treatment with each decontamination material as directed by the manufacturer, resin blocks were treated with silane coupling using primer (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake Dental). The dentin surface was treated with primer (PANAVIA V5 Tooth Primer, Kuraray Noritake Dental). The adhesive resin cement PANAVIA V5 was used as the luting cement, and was bonded by light irradiation from four directions for 10 s each using an LED light curing machine (PENCURE, J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) with a mean output of 1,000 mW/cm
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!