The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

120 protocols using voriconazole

1

Radial Growth Assay of A. fumigatus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The radial growth measurements of A. fumigatus were performed as previously described (Fuller et al., 2015). Briefly, 2 μl of a 2.5 106 mL−1 conidial suspension (wild-type or PniiA::panK strain) were point inoculated onto the center of a solid GMM-NO3 or GMM-NH4. Plates were incubated for 72 h at 35°C, with colony diameters measured each day. To assess voriconazole sensitivity of the strains, 2 μl of a 2.5 106 mL−1 conidial suspension were spotted onto GMM-NO3 or GMM-NH4 solid agar (24-well plate) containing various concentrations of voriconazole (Sigma). Plates were incubated at 35°C and photographed after 72 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antifungal Susceptibility of Scedosporium spp.

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antifungal agents used were DAmB (Sigma–Aldrich), LAmB (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) and voriconazole (Sigma–Aldrich). DAmB and voriconazole were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma–Aldrich) to a stock concentration of 5 and 18 mg/mL, respectively, and stored at −30°C. LAmB was reconstituted in sterile water to 5 mg/mL (powder containing 50 mg of amphotericin B dissolved in 10 mL of sterile water) and was stored at 4°C. Each drug was further diluted to 1024 mg/L in RPMI-1640 medium and used to produce double-fold serial dilutions ranging from 0.007 to 256 mg/L. For comparative purposes, the susceptibility profile of planktonic cells and biofilms to each antifungal agent was determined by the XTT reduction assay, as previously described.9 (link)The MIC50 of both growth forms was determined as the minimum antifungal drug concentration that caused ≥50% fungal damage compared with untreated controls. The average planktonic MIC50 of DAmB, LAmB and voriconazole against S. apiospermum and FSSC was 0.25/0.5/0.125 mg/L and 0.125/0.25/1 mg/L, respectively. The corresponding average biofilm MIC50 of DAmB, LAmB and voriconazole against S. apiospermum and FSSC was 1/2/32 mg/L and 0.5/1/>256 mg/L, respectively.9 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Preparing Fluconazole and Voriconazole Stock Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluconazole and voriconazole powders (≥98 % purity by HPLC) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (n° F8929 and PZ0005, respectively). Fluconazole stock solutions were prepared in sterile distilled water, while voriconazole in 100 % dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich), and stored at −20 °C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antifungal Activity of Tryptophol and Voriconazole

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A stock solution of 1 M tryptophol (TOH) was prepared by dissolving TOH in ethanol. The stock solution was then diluted to the desired concentration with the use of SDA. Twenty microliters of S. apiospermum CBS 117410 conidia suspension were placed in each well of a six-well plate containing serial dilutions (1, 10, 100, and 1000 μM) of TOH (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and serial dilutions (1, 10, 100, and 1000 μM) of voriconazole (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) in SDA. The plate was incubated at 25°C, and the colony morphology was observed, and the colony diameter was measured on days 2, 4, and 6. The plates were monitored for 10 days. Wells that contain 1% (v/v) ethanol (TOH diluent) and TOH-free SDA were also included as controls for TOH experiments. In the case of voriconazole, groups that were prepared with voriconazole-free SDA and 1% (v/v) RPMI (voriconazole diluent) were used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia spp.

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using a broth microdilution method as described by Leong et al. (10 (link)). Briefly, 200× drug stock dilutions were prepared at a 2× concentration in fresh OptiMAL medium. Amphotericin B, terbinafine, clotrimazole, miconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, and ketoconazole were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Singapore. Stock and drug plate dilutions were prepared in accordance with CLSI and EUCAST guidelines. Yeast inocula were obtained from 4- to 7-day-old strains of Malassezia spp. A 50-μl yeast inoculum was added to 50 μl of 2× concentrated antifungals to achieve a final cell density of 5 × 103 to 5 × 104 CFU/ml. A 10-μl portion of 2× yeast inoculum that had been diluted 10 times was also plated onto a modified Leeming-Notman agar plate and incubated for 4 to 7 days at 35°C for postverification of the CFU inoculum (10 to 100 colonies per 10 μl). Each assay was performed in triplicate plates for a single culture at every individual time point or reading.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clinical isolate was subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing according to CLSI guidelines (M38-A document), as previously described [3 (link), 18 (link)], and the MICs of antifungal combinations were determined according to previously described methods [3 (link), 18 (link)]. Itraconazole (Xian-Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd. Xi’ an, China), terbinafine (Beijing Novartis Pharmaceutical Ltd. (Beijing, China)) and voriconazole (Sigma, USA) were dissolved in 100% DMSO as a stock solution (3200 μg/mL). Drugs were diluted to obtain final concentrations, with Itraconazole and voriconazole from 0.008 to 8 μg/mL and terbinafine from 0.008 to 0.5 μg/mL. Isolates were sub-cultured, and spores from colonies were collected and adjusted with saline to achieve an inoculum concentration of 106 conidia/mL. Each suspension was diluted 1:50–100 with RPMI 1640 to obtain the final test inoculum (0.4–5×104 conidia/mL). Conidial suspension of each of the tested strains were cultivated on RPMI 1640 medium for 7 days at 35°C. Candida parapsilosis ATCC22019 (CBS604), obtained from Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS, the Netherlands), was used as a quality control. The final test inoculum concentration was 0.5–2.5×103 conidia/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antifungal Compounds Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Posaconazole (Selleck Chemicals Co. Ltd. Houston, TX, USA), ketoconazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), fluconazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), econazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), miconazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), itroconazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), clotrimizole (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), voriconazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), amphotericin B (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), caspofungin (Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ, USA), terbinifine (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), and micafungin (Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ, USA) were obtained commercially.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Voriconazole Analysis in Rat Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The OJT007 (purity > 90%) was purchased from MolPort (Riga, Latvia). The voriconazole, formic acid, ascorbic acid and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). LC-MS grade water and acetonitrile were purchased from J.T. Baker Chemical Co. (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). LC-MS/UPLC grade Methanol was acquired from Mallinckrodt Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). The blank rat plasma was purchased from Innovative Research (Novi, MI, USA). Male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from Envigo RMS (Indianapolis, IN, USA). All of the other chemicals and reagents were used as received.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antifungal Susceptibility of C. africana Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All C. africana isolates obtained herein were tested for in vitro susceptibility to amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), caspofungin (Merck & Co., Inc.), and micafungin (Astellas Pharma) by using broth microdilution method as described in CLSI document M27-A3 and M27-S4. The MIC values were read following 24 h of incubation and determined visually as the lowest concentration in which prominent decrease in turbidity was observed excepting for amphotericin B which is defined as the lowest concentration in which the absence of turbidity is observed. The recently revised CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) values for C. albicans were used as reference [28 (link)]. Quality control was performed as recommended in CLSI documents using C. parapsilosis ATCC22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antifungal Screening and Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amphotericin B, ketoconazole and voriconazole were purchased from Sigma. All other CYP51 inhibitors were synthesized in-house (see supplementary methods and [34 (link),35 (link),36 (link)]). Stationary phase promastigotes (8x105/mL) were treated for 72 h with two-fold dilution of inhibitors in 384 well plate format. Resazurin (0.025 mg/mL, Santa Cruz) was added for 5 h, cells were fixed, and fluorescence measured at 490 nm excitation and 595 nm emission wavelengths. Data was normalized to the Amphotericin B positive control and DMSO vehicle negative control for each plate, and EC50 values calculated using Collaborative Drug Discovery Vault software. T. cruzi cell-based activity was determined by high content screening in triplicate, as previously described [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!