The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using dnaman program

1

Transcriptional Analysis of TaOSCA1.4 in Wheat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transcript levels of TaOSCA1.4 in Fielder organs were analyzed via qRT−PCR. The primers used were as follows:
The first-strand cDNAs were synthesized from 2 µg of RNA per sample using TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen, Beijing, China). The qRT−PCR aplifications were performed as described by Zhao et al. (2020) (link). Amplification of TaActin was used as an internal control for data normalization. The experiments were independently replicated three times under identical conditions. The complete alignment of multiple coding sequences and translations of nucleotides into amino acid sequences were performed using the DNAMAN program (version 5.2.2; Lynnon Biosoft, Canada). The prediction of the transmembrane structure was performed using DeepTMHMM (https://dtu.biolib.com/DeepTMHMM). Collinearity analysis was performed using the Triticeae-Gene Tribe (TGT, http://wheat.cau.edu.cn/TGT/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gene Expression Analysis by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (1×105 per well in a 6-well plate) were cultured and treated as described above. Total RNA was isolated using an RNApure Tissue Kit (CWBiotech; Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers were designed using the DNAMAN program (V. 6.0.3; Lynnon Biosoft, Canada). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using ReverTra Ace-α (Toyobo; Osaka, Japan). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed by LightCycler-based SYBR Green I dye detection with UltraSYBR Mixture (CWBiotech). Gene expression was quantified by the 2-ΔΔCT method [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analysis of TFEB Gene Promoter Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fasting venous blood was collected, and peripheral leukocytes were isolated with the Human Leukocyte Isolation system (Haoyang Biological Products Technology Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China). Genomic DNAs were extracted with the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, United States). The promoter region of the human TFEB gene were generated with PCR and directly sequenced. Two overlapped DNA fragments, 705 bp (−1312 ∼−608 bp) and 801 bp (−657 bp ∼ +144 bp), were overlapped, covering the TFEB gene promoter region. The PCR primers were designed using the human TFEB genomic sequence (National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank accession no. NC_000006.12). PCR products were directly and bi-directionally sequenced on a 3500XL genetic analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, United States) by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). DNA sequences were then compared with the wild-type TFEB gene promoter using the DNAMAN program (Version 5.2.2, Lynnon BioSoft, Quebec, Canada), and regulatory variants including single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified. Wild and variant TFEB gene promoters were analyzed using TRANSFAC and JASPAR programs to predict the binding sites for the transcription factor affected by regulatory variants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Characterization of VvSUN Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Information on DNA and protein sequences was obtained from the NCBI database. The procedures reported by Zheng et al. [42 (link)] were utilized for DNA extraction, isolation of total RNA, first-strand cDNA synthesis, and DNase I treatment. The VvSUN (LOC100253695) cDNAs were isolated from six different grape cultivars during the pre-bloom phase by RT–PCR based on primers VvSUN-F/VvSUN-R (Supplementary Data Table S2) before cloning them into the pEASY®-Blunt Cloning Vector (TransGen). The VvSUN promoter (−1833 bp to ATG) from different cultivars was amplified by primers VvSUNpro-F/R from grape DNA, followed by cloning into the pEASY®-Blunt Cloning Vector (TransGen). Several clones were randomly chosen and verified by sequencing. The DNAMAN program (Lynnon Biosoft, San Ramon, CA, USA) was employed to assess sequence alignment. Supplementary Data Table S2 gives a complete list of all of the primer pairs that were utilized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mitogenome Sequence Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the sequence had been manually checked, the mitogenome sequence was performed using the BLAST program from NCBI (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), then assembled using the DNAman program (LynnonBiosoft, San Ramon, CA, USA) [18 ]. Thirteen PCGs were first identified using an open reading frame (ORF) finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/) [19 (link)] to specify the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code and translate it into putative proteins based on the Limacidae sequences available in GenBank. The codon usage of thirteen PCGs was computed using the MEGA 6.0 software [20 ]. The tRNA genes were verified using the MITOS WebServer (http://mitos.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py), using the default settings [21 (link)]. The skewness of nucleotide composition was gauged according to the following formulas: AT skew [(A − T)/(A + T)] and GC skew [(G − C)/(G + C)] [22 (link)], where the positive AT skew means that there are more As than Ts; an AT negative skew means that there are less As than Ts, and the same for the GC skew.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phylogenetic Analysis of Sequence Alignments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequences were assembled using MEGA5 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and aligned with ClustalW [50 (link)]. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the maximum likelihood (ML) method. Phylogenetic trees were constructed with the Kimura two-parameter model. The gamma-distributed with invariant sites (G+I) Tamura-Nei model [51 (link)–54 (link)] was used for the maximum likelihood analyses. Bootstrap test results with 500 replicates are shown next to the branches of the trees. The evolutionary analyses were performed with MEGA6. The dot-plot comparisons between pairs of sequences were drawn with DNAMAN program (Lynnon Biosoft, Quebec, Canada) with default parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transcriptional Analysis of TaDHL-7B in Wheat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transcript levels of TaDHL-7B in ‘Fielder’ organs were analyzed by qRT-PCR. The first-strand cDNAs were synthesized by 2 μg of RNA per sample using TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen, Beijing, China). The qRT-PCR amplifications were performed as described by Zhao et al. [34 (link)]. Amplification of TaActin was used as an internal control for data normalization. The experiments were independently replicated three times under identical conditions. The complete alignment of multiple coding sequences and translations of nucleotides into amino acid sequences were performed using the DNAMAN program (Version5.2.2, Lynnon Bio-soft, Canada). The hydrophilic/hydrophobic analysis was performed using Prot Param (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 1 May 2022). The prediction of the transmembrane structure was performed using DeepTMHMM (https://dtu.biolib.com/DeepTMHMM, accessed on 14 April 2022). The collinearity analysis was performed using Triticeae-Gene Tribe (TGT, http://wheat.cau.edu.cn/TGT/m.html?navbar=MicroCollinearity, accessed on 1 May 2022). The prediction of the three-dimensional structures of proteins was performed using Swiss-model (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/interactive, accessed on 1 May 2022).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cloning and Characterization of TaMYB29 Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To clone the TaMYB29 gene, a pair of primers (M29-F/R) were designed using the Primer 5.0 software. The primers were designed based on the TaMYB29 sequence released by the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences in 2012 (NCBI GenBank Accession No. JF951912.1); these were largely used to amplify the open reading frame (ORF) of the TaMYB29 gene. The PCR program was as follows: 3min at 95°C, followed by 35cycles of 30s at 95°C, 30s at 55°C, and 60s at 72°C, and finally 10min at 72°C. The PCR mixture contained the following: 0.125μl of Takara Ex Taq, 2.5μl of 10× Ex Tag buffer, 2μl of dNTP mixture, 2μl of template, and 1μl of each primer. Next, the total volume was made up to 20μl with ddH2O. The target fragments were inserted into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, United States) and sequenced. The TaMYB29 sequence was used to BLAST the related MYB genes at the National Center for Biotechnology Information1 and the Ensemble plant database at http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html. The DNAman program (Lynnon Biosoft, Quebec, Canada) was used to align all nucleotide sequences of these genes and corresponding deduced protein sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Amplicon Sequencing for Anaplasma ovis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four selected PCR amplicons, two from the first sampling date (one lamb and one ewe) and two from the ninth sampling date (one lamb and one ewe), were purified with the GF-1 Ambi Clean kit (Vivantis, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified amplicons were sequenced in both directions using the same primers as for the A. ovis msp4-specific PCR amplifications (Table 1). The reaction was realized with a conventional Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Perkin Elmer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) and ABI3730XL automated DNA sequencer by Macrogen Europe (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The evaluation of chromatograms was performed by using Chromas Lite v 2.01.
Multiple sequence alignments of the amplicons and nucleotides’ translation were performed using DNAMAN program (Version 5.2.2; Lynnon Biosoft, Quebec, Canada). A BLAST analysis was performed in GenBank to compare the published sequences with ours (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 24 June 2022) [25 (link)]. The DNAMAN program was used to build a phylogenetic tree based on the distance method using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm of Saitou and Nei (1987) [26 (link)] with a bootstrap of 1000 iterations. Four msp4 amplicons were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers from MZ073666 to MZ073669.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification of WRKY Proteins in Arabidopsis nanus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequences of Arabidopsis WRKY proteins were downloaded from the Arabidopsis database (TAIR, http://www.arabidopsis.org/). The A. nanus genome was downloaded from the GigaScience database (GigaDB, http://gigadb.org/; accession number 100466). First, a local protein database was established containing the proteome of A. nanus using BioEdit 7.2.0 software (Ibis Therapeutics, Carlsbad, USA) [28] . To identify WRKY proteins in A. nanus, a local BlastP search was performed using a hidden Markov model (HMM) profile of the WRKY domain (PF03106) as query sequences. Default parameters were used and the expectation (E) value was less than 0.001. The search results were used to identify candidate genes, and then conserved domain analysis was conducted with the SMART program [29] . After removing low-reliability and redundant sequences, the complete set of A. nanus WRKY family proteins was obtained. To further analyze the zinc finger structure of A. nanus WRKY proteins, candidate protein sequences were aligned in the DNAman program (Lynnon BioSoft, San Ramon, CA, USA). In addition, the theoretical isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (MW) were analyzed using the ProtParam program [30] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!