The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using ab31704

1

Immunohistochemistry of GN and Dclk1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for GN (human) and Dclk1 (human and rat). Because of the lack of appropriate antibodies, we were not able to carry out IHC for GN (rat) or UGN (human and rat). Serial sections with adjoining sides facing up on the slides were used to determine the possible co-localization of GUCA2B/Guca2b (ISH) and Dclk1 (IHC).
GN IHC on human duodenal and colonic biopsies was performed with anti-GN (HPA018215; Atlas Antibodies, Stockholm, Sweden; dilution 1:50 or 1:100), as previously described (Brenna et al. 2015 (link)). Dclk1 IHC (ab31704; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; dilution 1:100) was similarly carried out, apart from antigen retrieval in citrate buffer, pH 6. Antibody detection was performed with secondary antibody (Dako REAL EnVision/HRP, Rabbit Mouse; Dako Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark). DAB (Dako REAL Substrate Buffer and Dako REAL DAB+ Chromogen; Dako Denmark) was used as chromogen. Hematoxylin was used for counterstaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were incubated with Fc Block (Bio X Cell, 2.4G2) and stained with antibodies to surface markers diluted in FWB. Cells were washed in FWB and resuspended in FWB containing DAPI (Roche) and flow cytometric counting beads (CountBright Absolute; Life Technologies) for live cell gating and counts. Cells for intracellular staining were washed in PBS and stained with Violet Live/Dead fixable stain (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Transcription factor staining was done using the FoxP3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBiosciences) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cells for DCLK1 staining were fixed in 4% PFA for 2–5 min, washed in FWB, and stained with rabbit anti-DCLK1 (Abcam; ab31704; 1:4000) antibody in perm/wash buffer from the FoxP3 staining buffer kit, followed by F(ab’)2 donkey anti-rabbit IgG-PE (Life Technologies; 1:1000) or goat anti-Rabbit AF488 (Invitrogen; 1:4000) for 10 min. Staining was done on ice. For co-staining of DCLK1 and endogenous IL-25 RFP, PFA fixation was performed for 30 seconds on ice. Samples were analyzed on a LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) with five lasers (355 nm, 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm and 640 nm). Samples were FSC-A/SSC-A gated to exclude debris, FSC-H/FSC-A gated to select single cells, and gated to exclude dead cells. Data were analyzed with FlowJo 9/10 (Treestar/Flowjo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody-based Protein Detection Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies (Abs) used in these studies included: anti-DCLK1 (generated against the common C-terminal end of the molecule, which is common to all the isoforms) (Abcam, Ab31704); anti-DCLK1-L antibody (generated against an epitope within the double-cortin domains and specific for the long isoform) (Abcam, Ab106635); anti-β-actin (total) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO); rabbit polyclonal antibody conjugated to Horseradish peroxidase (GE healthcare UK); goat anti-rabbit immunogold (15nM) antibody (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Reagents used in these studies included ABC staining kit for immunohistochemistry (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, CA) and TSA Plus Biotin Kit (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Transfection reagent, FuGENE6 was bought from Roche (Branford, CT). All reagent grade chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of DCLK1 and Lgr5 in Colorectal Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 92 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples were cut into sections 5-μm thick and stained using a standard-chain polymer-conjugated technique. The tissue sections were dewaxed, antigens were retrieved in an autoclave for 10 min, and the sections were then cooled to room temperature. Endogenous peroxidases were blocked by incubating the sections in 3% hydrogen peroxide (kit-0014, Maxim, Fuzhou, China). The sections were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: Rabbit polyclonal anti-DCLK1 (1:100 dilution, ab31704; Abcam, United Kingdom) and rabbit polyclonal anti-Lgr5 (1:50 dilution, ab75732; Abcam, United Kingdom). The slides were stained and visualized with a standard immunohistochemistry kit (kit-0014, Maxim, Fuzhou, China). Colorectal cancer tissues with intense immunoreactivity to DCLK1 and Lgr5 were used as positive controls; in the negative control, the primary antibody was replaced with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Intestinal Histological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small “Swiss-rolled” intestinal sections (4 µm) were cut mounted and either stained with Alcian blue and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS, mucus) or left unstained for further processing. Staining of RELM-β was adapted from a published method66 (link). Sections were stained with primary antibodies, anti-RELM-β antibody (Peprotech 500-P215) or control IgG, followed by incubation with secondary antibody, anti-rabbit IgG biotinylated (Jackson Immunoresearch 711-065-152). Vectastain peroxidase kit (Vector Laboratories PK-6100) and 3,3’-diaminobenzidine were used to reveal the staining and counter-stained with Harris’ solution. The total number of goblet cells in the intestinal epithelial lining was determined by counting the cells immunostained with PAS, and based on their morphology and location being consistent with goblet cells, in one random high-power field (magnification) displaying mucosal integrity and no artefacts. Tuft cells staining was performed using anti-DCLK1 antibody (Abcam, AB31704) and anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 111-545-003). Nuclei were then fluorescently labelled using NucBlue (Invitrogen, Hoechst 33342). The number of tuft cells per villi were counted in five random high-power fields (what magnification) per sample displaying mucosal integrity and no artefacts. These values should be taken as relative differences rather than absolute levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Identification of Intestinal Epithelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse intestines were opened longitudinally and vortexed in a 50-ml conical tube containing Hanks’ balanced salt solution supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated FBS and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2. Epithelial cells were isolated by rotating the tissues in a pre-digestion medium (RPMI medium, 5% heat-inactivated FBS, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, and 10 mM EDTA) for 30 min at 37 °. Cells were stained with antibodies for CD326 (BioLegend, catalog no. G8.8, 1:200), CD45.2 (BioLegend, catalog no. 30-F11), anti-DCLK1 (Abcam; ab31704) and LIVE/DEAD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ALDH1 and DLCK1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide, followed by antigen retrieval in boiling 0.1 M citrate (pH 6.0) buffer for 10 min twice. The sections were then blocked with 20% goat/rabbit serum for 30 min. Immunostaining was performed as previously described 36 (link); antibodies against ALDH1 (1:100; Abcam,ab195255) or DLCK1(1:100; Abcam,ab31704 ) were used. The ratio of positively stained cells to tumor cells was scored and reported as the mean ± SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Subcutaneous Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The harvested subcutaneous tumors were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and embedded in paraffin, finally sliced into 6 µm-thick sections for IHC analysis. Briefly, these tissues sections were deparaffinized in xylene for 30mins and hydrated in a descending alcohol series (100% alcohol, 95% alcohol, 80% alcohol) for 5 min respectively. After antigen retrieval with EDTA (ZSGB-BIO, China) and blocking with goat serum for one hour at room temperature, the sections were incubated with the corresponding antibody at 4 °C overnight. Followed by incubation with enhanced enzyme-labeled goat anti-mouse/rabbit IgG polymer (ZSGB-BIO, China), IHC signal was detected by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, ZSGB-BIO, China). The antibodies used above were: anti-CD4 (1:500, ab183685, Abcam), anti-CD8 (1:500, ab217344, Abcam), anti-CD163(1:500, ab182422, Abcam), anti-E-cadherin (1:500, 3195T, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-IFN-γ (1:100, AF-585-NA, R&D), anti-DCLK1 (1:500, ab31704, Abcam)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of DCLK1 in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A pancreatic adenocarcinoma tissue microarray (US Biomax, HPan-Ade 180 Sur-02) containing 180 microsections including 60 paired tumor and normal adjacent tissues was immunostained with anti-DCLK1 antibody (Abcam, ab31704) following our previously described protocol [20 (link)]. Each stained tissue microsection was scored independently by two pathologists and based on percent of tissue demonstrating staining (1 for <10%-4 for > 60%) and staining intensity (1 for lowest intensity, 4 for highest intensity). The resulting scores were multiplied by each other to obtain a composite score.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Staining of Intestinal Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue was excised and fixed for 48 h in 4% PFA in PBS at 4°C, after which it was transferred to 20% sucrose solution. After cryosectioning, antigen retrieval was accomplished by incubating the slides in 1% SDS for 5 min. Blocking was performed with 10% donkey serum. Following washing, primary antibodies were added and incubated overnight at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit FITC-anti-Lyz (1:400, Dako, F037201), rabbit anti-Muc2 (1:50, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-15334), rabbit anti-ChgA (1:100, Abcam, ab15160) and rabbit anti-Dclk1 antibody (1:1000, Abcam, ab31704). Secondary detection was carried out using Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21206) and DAPI (10 μg/mL). Fluorescent imaging was carried out using a TCS SP5 confocal microscope (Leica). Image analysis was carried out using iMaris software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!