The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

160 protocols using sputter coater 108 auto

1

Scaffold Characterization by Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
G and NG scaffolds were analyzed by optical stereo microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Philips-XL 30 ESEM-FEG). Directly after plotting, scaffolds were cut in half and pictures were taken with a stereological microscope. Afterwards, the samples were gold sputtered and analyzed by SEM. Scaffolds cultured in mineralization media for 3, 7 and 28 days were fixed using 10% formalin, dehydrated by an increased series of ethanol concentration (50-60-70-80-90-96-100%) and cut in half. The final dehydration step was carried out via immersion in hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma Aldrich) and overnight evaporation. Dry scaffolds were mounted on SEM stubs, gold sputtered (Cressington sputter coater 108 auto), and analyzed using 10 kV and a working distance of 25 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Surface Integrity Analysis of Crimped Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to assess integrity of the surface modifications after crimping to ~Φ1.0 mm on a balloon‐expandable delivery system, followed by expansion to ~Φ3.3 mm, the surfaces of the scaffolds were observed with a scanning electronic microscope (TeScan Vega III, Czech Republic). The surface was coated with a thin layer of gold for better conductivity by a sputter coater (Cressington Sputter Coater 108auto, UK).
The thickness of the fluoride layer was measured by element mapping of a linescan on cross sections of Res‐F scaffolds (EDX, Fisher Scientific). To measure the thickness of the polymer coating, cross sections of Res‐PF were visualised using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Keyence VK‐X 150, Japan). If necessary, the contrast of the images was enhanced (Adobe Photoshop CC) to better recognize details.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Surface Conductivity of Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sheet resistance R S was the chosen property to evaluate the electrical conductivity at the surface of the nanocomposite. Electrodes were deposited by sputtering of 10 nm of gold (Cressington Sputter Coater 108auto) with a shadow mask to define square areas. The probe area was a rectangle of 2mmx4mm. A digital multimeter, Keithly's Series 2636B, was used to monitor the I-V curves. The sheet resistance R sheet was calculated using the slope of the I-V curve (R measured ) and the following equation: R sheet =2 x R measured .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing Cell-Membrane Interactions via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cellular interaction with the fibrous membranes was visualized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (TESCAN Mira 3 LM field emission, Czech Republic). The samples were fixed using a PBS solution containing 2.5 vol.% glutaraldehyde and 2 vol.% PFA for 1 h. Following three washes with water, the samples were dehydrated using a series of alcohol washes (20, 30, 50, 70, 80, and 100 vol.% ethanol) for 10 min each before being treated with a solution of HMDS in ethanol (1:1 volume ratio). Before imaging, the samples were left to dry for 3 days and sputter-coated with 3 nm of gold (Sputter Coater 108 Auto, Cressington Scientific Instruments, Watford, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopic Surface Characterization of PLA and PET Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A microscopic analysis of structural changes of the film surface was carried out using an SEM (Hitachi SU 8010, Japan). Fragments were cut from the 30 ×30 mm samples, and then sprayed with gold to a thickness of 1 nm using a gold dust sprayer (Cressington Sputter Coater 108 auto, UK) with a dust-layer thickness meter (Cressington Thickness Monitor mtm10, UK). Pictures were taken at 1000 × magnification. Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) was performed using the SEM-EDX module (Thermo Scientific Ultra Dry, USA). The EDX spectrum of the sample surface allowed a semi-quantitative analysis of the elementary composition to the depth of ca. 1 μm (Varesano, Dall’acqua & Tonin, 2005 (link)). During the EDX analysis, a voltage of 20 kV and current of 15 μA was applied to the prepared samples. The analysis of the elemental composition of the surface lasted 30 s at ×100 magnification and a working distance of 15 mm. The experiment was repeated in 5 replicates for each variant containing either PLA or PET film.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Rectangular Plate Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were obtained using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (Inspect F50, FEI, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 10.0 kV, after Pt coating (sputter coater 108auto, Cressington Scientific Instruments, UK). Transmission electron microscopy image and selected area electron diffraction patterns of the rectangular plate foldectures F2 were obtained using a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai G2 30, FEI, USA) operated at 200 kV. Samples were deposited on a formvar carbon film on a 200-mesh copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, USA). Optical microscopy movies were recorded using a three-dimensional digital microscope system equipped with a charge-coupled device camera (KH-8700, Hirox, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SEM Analysis of Submerged MSM Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSM samples were submerged in a jam jar filled with tap water to a height of about 1.5 cm, i.e., below hmax to allow for a persistent air layer. The jar was closed and stored on a rack in the office. After one month, the samples were taken out of the water and dried in air. The dried samples were mounted to aluminum stubs and fixated using silver paste. To enhance the conductivity, the samples were sputtered with a thin gold layer (thickness 20 nm, Sputter Coater 108 auto, Cressington, Dortmund). Afterwards the samples have been analyzed using SEM (15 kV, CAMBRIDGE Stereoscan 200 SEM, Zeiss AG, Oberkochen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Composite Surface Morphology by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the composite surface was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Hitachi SU3500, Tokyo, Japan) at 5 kV under high-vacuum conditions. The small cut of each sample was applied to the aluminum stage covered by carbon tape. Next, the samples were coated with an ultrathin gold layer (Au) using an ion-sputtering machine (Cressington Sputter Coater 108 Auto, Watford, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electrospun Scaffold Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of electrospun scaffolds was observed by SEM (Philips XL30 ESEM-FEG). Prior to SEM imaging, samples were gold sputtered with a Cressington Sputter Coater 108 Auto set at 30 mA for 40 s. To create cross-section images, samples were first frozen in liquid nitrogen and then cut. The average fiber diameter and fiber diameter distribution were calculated by measuring at least 30 fibers in one SEM image and five images were used for each scaffold using Adobe Photoshop CS4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ultrastructural Analysis of ECM Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ECM hydrogels (6 mg/mL) were prepared from the rat normal, metaplastic, and neoplastic ECM. ECM hydrogel ultrastructure was examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as previously described (26 (link)). Samples were fixed in cold 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 hours, rinsed in PBS, dehydrated with graded ethanol (30, 50, 70, 90, 100% ethanol in PBS) at 45 min per wash, and critical point dried for 5 hours (Leica EM CPD030 Critical Point Dryer, Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL). After drying, gels were sputter-coated (Sputter Coater 108 Auto, Cressington Scientific Instruments, Watford, UK) with a 4.6 nm thick gold/palladium alloy coating and imaged with a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM6330f, JEOL Ltd., Peabody, MA) at 2,000 and 10,000x magnification (n=2, 5 technical replicates).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!