The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Scanr high content screening station

Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in Japan, Germany

The ScanR High Content Screening Station is a versatile automated microscopy system designed for high-content screening applications. It provides advanced imaging capabilities and analysis tools to support researchers in various fields, including cell biology, drug discovery, and toxicology. The system combines high-resolution imaging, automated sample handling, and comprehensive data analysis software to enable efficient and reliable screening of large sample sets.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using scanr high content screening station

1

Analyzing mitotic spindle dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were plated on glass coverslips and then transfected with siRNAs using Lipofectamine RNAiMax [ThermoFisher Scientific]. 48 hours after treatment, cells to be used for immunofluorescence were treated with nocodozole and DMSO, or GKI-1. After fixing and staining with antibodies, cells were visualised with a ScanR High Content Screening Station [Olympus Life Science]. Time-lapse videos for treated cells were recorded on an Olympus IX3 microscope fitted with an Ocra-Flash 4.0 CMOS camera [Hamatsu].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Adipogenic and Chondrogenic Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibroblasts were cultured in adipogenic differentiation medium (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) for 2 weeks and stained with 1:1,000 HCS LipidTOX™ Deep Red Neutral Lipid Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts). Images were taken using a Scan R high content screening station (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The percentage of differentiated fibroblasts was quantified using Scan R analysis software version 3.1.1. Fibroblasts were cultured in chondrogenic differentiation medium (Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) for 2 to 3 weeks and time in days was measured until three-dimensional cartilage-like structure formed (Supplementary Figure S7).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hepatocyte Polarization Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hepatocytes were cultured onto eight-well chambered μ slides (Ibidi, Martinsried, Germany) overnight. Overnight cultivation enables polarization of the cells, which is disturbed by collagenase treatment during isolation. For insulin-binding experiments, polarization is crucial since the receptor is only expressed on the sinusoidal side of the hepatocyte. Cell membranes were stained with AlexaFluor 546 labeled anti-ß-catenin antibodies (Cell Signaling, Frankfurt, Germany). One slide with eight independent chambers was used for any condition tested in each experiment. DNA-labeling was performed with 4′, 6-Diamidin-2-Phenylindol (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich). Images were acquired at room temperature with an Olympus ScanR high content screening station (Olympus Europe, Hamburg, Germany), using a 20 x LUCPLFLN, N.A. 0.45 objective and ScanR acquisiton software (v.2.2.09). Fluorescence emission for DAPI was measured between 437 and 475 nm, green fluorescence (FITC and GFP) between 510 and 550 nm and AlexaFluor 546 between 573 and 613 nm. A total of 60–80 pictures were taken per chamber with a robot covering the whole slide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Dendritic Cell Surface Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface marker expression of dendritic cells was analyzed by microscopy after staining with anti-human HLA-DR Alexa 488 and anti-human CD86 Alexa 647 (both from Biolegend, London, UK) and putting the cells in a 96-well black clear bottom plate (BD Bioscience, Heidelberg, Germany). The images were acquired using an Olympus Scan^R High Content Screening Station based on a IX81 stage and using either the 20x 0.45 LUCPLFLN (quantitation) or 40x 0.9 UPLSAPO (close up images) objectives, and Scan^R Acquisition software v. 2.6.2. Analysis of the images was done using Scan^R Analysis software v. 2.6.2. Acquisition and analysis settings were identical for each well. For the analysis, after background subtraction, the segmentation mask used to identify the cells had an intensity threshold for either the Alexa 488 (HLA-DR) and Alexa 647 (CD86) signals, respectively, and used a watershed transform to limit the number of doublets. The Alexa 488 and Alexa 647 intensities, respectively, for all pixels of each cell were summed and defined as the total intensities for each channel, respectively. The means of these total intensity values were then calculated for each well and fluorochrome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-Content Screening of Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brightfield and fluorescent images were obtained using an automated fluorescence microscope (Olympus ScanR High Content Screening Station) using the 20x UPLSAPO NA 0.75 objective. Cell images were classified according to cell viability (CV), programmed apoptosis (AP), autophagy (AG), or cell death (CD). In total, 7500 images were analyzed using the Fiji program (v.2.0.0) and the Trainable Weka Segmentation plugin (v.3.2.33): The Weka plugin within ImageJ is an open-source platform for biological-image analyses that combines a collection of machine learning algorithms with a set of selected image features to produce pixel-based segmentations [24 (link),25 (link)]. All of the experiments were performed in triplicate and the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test were used for comparisons of each group. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant and are indicated with asterisks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!