The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using ab4729

1

Integrative Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After husbandry, challenge, and dissection as in the RNA-seq experiment for 30- and 120-min samples, tissue samples dissected from five animals were pooled for ChIP-seq. Briefly, nuclei were isolated, chromatin was fragmented, and a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against acetylated histone H3 lysine 27 (Abcam ab4729) or ESRRA (Santa Cruz sc-66882) was used to precipitate chromatin. After ChIP, immunoprecipitated DNA was checked for quality and then used to prepare libraries that were sequenced with an Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencer. Detailed methods used for ChIP-seq tissue preparation, library preparation, and sequencing are included in Supplemental Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Histone and Transcription Factor Profiling in iPSCs and iPSC-CMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We generated and analyzed 48 ChIP-seq of histone modification H3K27ac (iPSCs: 17 samples and 4 technical replicates; iPSC-CMs: 25 samples and 2 technical replicates), and 15 ChIP-seq of NKX2–5 (iPSC-CMs: 12 samples and 3 technical replicates) (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3), using anti-H3K27ac (Abcam ab4729) and anti-NKX2–5 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-8697x) antibodies. Libraries were sequenced to an average of 35 million 100 bp paired-end reads per sample. ChIP-seq reads were mapped to the hg19 reference using BWA65 . Duplicate reads, reads mapping to blacklisted regions and read-pairs with mapping quality Q < 30 were filtered. Peak calling was performed using MACS273 with reads derived from sonicated chromatin not subjected to IP (i.e. input chromatin) from a pool of samples used as negative control. For each data type, peak coordinates were called from combined BAM files across all samples of either iPSCs or iPSC-CMs. Quantification of the signal at peaks in each sample was performed using featureCounts74 . Motif enrichment analysis was performed using HOMER75 and, for NKX2–5, also using MEME ChIP76 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Investigating Myoblast Differentiation and Epigenetic Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C2C12 myoblasts (ATCC) and the p300 shRNA knockdown cells [36] were maintained in proliferating conditions at a confluency lower than 70% in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS (GM) at 37ºC with 5% CO2. Myoblasts were induced to differentiate at about 80% confluence using differentiation medium (DM, DMEM medium containing 2% horse serum). Whole cell extracts were prepared for protein immunoblotting, as described previously [53]. Scion Image Software (Scion Corp.) was used for protein band quantification, where band intensities were measured and corrected for against the background of the images. The antibodies used in this study for H4K8ac, H3K9ac, H3K18ac, and H3K27ac were obtained from Abcam (ab15823, ab4441, ab1191, ab4729, respectively), while anti-p300 and anti-MyoD were from Santa Cruz (sc-584x, sc-32758x, respectively). Myogenin antibody was from hybridoma F5D and anti-tubulin from hybridoma E7 [54].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ChIP-exo: Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With the following modifications, ChIP-exo was performed as previously described [24 (link)] with chromatin extracted from 50 million cells, ProteinG MagSepharose resin (GE Healthcare), and 5 μg of antibody directed against the H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, or Tal1 (Abcam ab8895, ab8580, ab4729, and Santa Cruz Biotech sc-12984, respectively). First, formaldehyde cross-linked cells were lysed with buffer 1 (50 mmol/L HEPES–KOH, pH 7.5; 140 mmol/L NaCl; 1 mmol/L EDTA; 10% glycerol; 0.5% Nonidet P-40; 0.25% Triton X-100) and washed once with buffer 2 (10 mmol/L Tris–HCL, pH 8; 200 mmol/L NaCl; 1 mmol/L EDTA; 0.5 mmol/L EGTA), and the nuclei were lysed with buffer 3 (10 mmol/L Tris–HCl, pH 8; 100 mmol/L NaCl; 1 mmol/L EDTA; 0.5 mmol/L EGTA; 0.1% sodium deoxycholate; 0.5% N-lauroylsarcosine). All cell lysis buffers were supplemented with fresh EDTA-free complete protease inhibitor cocktail (CPI, Roche, No. 11836153001). Purified chromatin was sonicated with a Bioruptor (Diagenode) to obtain fragments ranging from 100 bp to 500 bp. Triton X-100 was added to extract at 1% to neutralize sarcosine. Insoluble chromatin debris was removed by centrifugation, and sonication extracts were stored at −80°C until used for ChIP analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ChIP-seq for Histone Modification and TF Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP coupled with massively parallel DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) was performed as previously described31 (link),32 (link). The following antibodies were used for ChIP: anti-H3K27ac (Abam, ab4729) and anti GATA3(Santa Cruz, sc-22206X). For each ChIP, 10 μg of antibody was added to 3 ml of sonicated nuclear extract. Illumina sequencing, library construction and ChIP-seq analysis methods were previously described32 (link). ChIP-seq datasets are available under super series GSE65664, and relevant accession numbers are shown in Supplemental Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ChIP-seq Analysis of Histone Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were crosslinked and sonicated followed by chromatin immunoprecipitation as previously described (29 (link)). Antibodies against H3K9ac, H3K18ac, H3K27ac, H4K8ac and H3K27me3 were obtained from Abcam (ab4441, ab1191, ab4729, ab15823 and ab6002), RXRα, and p300 from Santa Cruz (sc-553x and sc-32758x). DNA was purified using the MinElute Spin Columns Kit (Qiagen) and input chromatin DNA was used as control. Purified DNA was sequenced by the McGill University Genome Quebec Innovation Centre with Illumina HiSeq 2000. Sequencing reads were mapped to the mouse genome build mm9 using Bowtie, allowing for three mismatches and reporting the single best alignment per 50 bp read. Picard was used to filter out replicated reads (http://picard.sourceforge.net/), and BAM files were converted into BED files with the BEDTools suite (33 (link)). For visualization of ChIP-seq signals in the Integrative Genomics Viewer, aligned reads were extended by 125 bp at their 3′ end and basewise signal intensity was computed. Local peaks in read enrichment were identified using MACS (34 (link)) (v1.0.0) with a P-value threshold of 1 × 10−5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

ChIP Assay Protocol for PDAC Stroma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, we used mouse CAF cells (97f) that were isolated from Ptf1a-Cre/+; LSL-KrasG12D/+;Tgfbr2flox/flox mice, a genetically engineered mouse model of PDAC that well recapitulates desmoplastic stroma in human PDAC [49 (link)]. For each assay, sheared chromatin equivalent to 7.5 × 106 cells were used. For each assay, 40 μL of magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-280 Seep anti-Rabbit IgG, Life Technologies) were blocked with 0.5 % BSA in PBS and further bound with 4 μg of indicated antibodies overnight at 4°C. Antibodies used for ChIP were: BRD4 (Bethly A301-985A), H3K27ac (Abcam, ab4729), RNA polymerase II (Santa Cruz, sc-899X), SMAD3 (Abcam, ab28379), and normal Rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Technology, CST2729). After purification of precipitated DNA, qPCR was performed. Detailed procedures for ChIP are described in Supplementary Methods. The ChIP primers are listed in Supplementary Table S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ChIP-seq Analysis of H3K27ac and NKX2-5 in iPSCs and iPSC-CMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We generated and analyzed 48 ChIP-seq of histone modification H3K27ac
(iPSCs: 17 samples and 4 technical replicates; iPSC-CMs: 25 samples and 2
technical replicates), and 15 ChIP-seq of NKX2-5 (iPSC-CMs: 12 samples and 3
technical replicates) (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3), using anti-H3K27ac
(Abcam ab4729) and anti-NKX2-5 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-8697x) antibodies.
Libraries were sequenced to an average of 35 million 100 bp paired-end reads per
sample. ChIP-seq reads were mapped to the hg19 reference using BWA65 (link). Duplicate reads, reads
mapping to blacklisted regions and read-pairs with mapping quality Q < 30
were filtered. Peak calling was performed using MACS273 (link) with reads derived from sonicated chromatin
not subjected to IP (i.e. input chromatin) from a pool of samples used as
negative control. For each data type, peak coordinates were called from combined
BAM files across all samples of either iPSCs or iPSC-CMs. Quantification of the
signal at peaks in each sample was performed using featureCounts74 (link). Motif enrichment analysis was
performed using HOMER75 (link) and,
for NKX2-5, also using MEME ChIP76 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

ChIP-seq and ChIP-qPCR Profiling of Epigenetic Regulators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP-seq or ChIP-qPCR was performed as described (78 (link)) using antibodies for H3K27ac (Abcam, ab4729), PPARG (Santa Cruz, sc-271392) or RXRA (Santa Cruz, sc-515928) in HL60, K562, MKPL-1, MV4–11, THP1 and U937 cells, respectively. ChIP-seq libraries were generated using NEBNext Ultra II DNA library prep kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (NEB), and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq500 system using the 75bp high output sequencing kit. ChIP-seq raw reads were aligned to the human hg19 genome assembly using Bowtie2 (72 (link)) with the default parameters. Only tags that uniquely mapped to the genome were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptional Regulation Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IP and western blotting were performed as described previously (Zhou et al., 2022 (link); He et al., 2023 (link)), except that IP was carried out with 4 μg of specific antibody. Antibodies used were anti-Klf5 (1:1000, Abcam, ab137676), anti-Cdx2 (1:1000, Abcam, ab76541), anti-Eomes (1:500, Santa Cruz, sc-293481), anti-p300 (1:500, Santa Cruz, sc-48343), anti-H3K27ac (1:1000, Abcam, ab4729), and anti-Elf5 (1:500, Santa Cruz, sc-166653).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!