The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti stat1 antibody

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

The Anti-STAT1 antibody is a laboratory reagent used to detect and study the STAT1 protein, a key mediator of cytokine and growth factor signaling. This antibody can be utilized in various immunoassay techniques, such as Western blotting, to identify and quantify the STAT1 protein in biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using anti stat1 antibody

1

ChIP-qPCR Profiling of STAT1/3 Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In brief, 1 × 107 A549 cells were treated with 20 ng/mL of IFNγ for 1.5 h or sequentially treated with 20 ng/mL of IFNγ for 2 h with 20 ng/mL of EGF for 1.5 h. After treatment, A549 cells were fixed by 1% formaldehyde and fragmentized by sonication. A549 cells were resuspended and incubated with control IgG, anti-STAT3, and anti-STAT1 antibodies (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) at 4 °C overnight for immunoprecipitation. After incubation, the antibodies were captured by Dynabead-Protein A (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). The Dynabeads were washed and consequently pulled down by a Sample Magnetic Rack. DNA fragments were eluted by boiling the Dynabeads and concentrated by a FavorPrep GEL/PCR Purification Mini Kit (Favorgen Biotech Corp., Wembley, WA, Australia). The DNA preparation was analyzed by real-time PCR using Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystem, CA, USA) with primer pairs shown in Table 1. The primer sequences amplify the PDL1 and MCL1 promoter predicted from PROMO (http://alggen.lsi.upc.es/, accessed on 4 May 2021).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ChIP Assay for Transcription Factor Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCT116 cells were treated with 5 μM Δ9-THC or 5 μM Δ9-THC plus 50 μM BODIPY-THIF for 6 h, cross-linked with 2% formaldehyde for 15 min, collected by scraping in PBS and then centrifuged and lysed in 1 mL of IP buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 and 1% Triton X-100) containing protease inhibitors. The obtained nuclear pellet was resuspended in IP buffer and sonicated. ChIP assays using control rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz) or anti-STAT1 antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) were performed. The immunoprecipitated DNA and input DNA were extracted by incubating the samples with 100 μL of 10% Chelex (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), then boiling them to reverse the cross-linking and then centrifuging them to remove the Chelex slurry. PCR was performed using two oligonucleotide primers as follows: GDNF (forward primer, 5’-CAGCATGGAAATGAAGCCTA-3’; reverse primer, 5’- TAGTTTAGTCCCCAGGCTAG-3’); IGFBP6 (forward primer, 5’- TGCTGACAATGAGGTTCGTAT-3’; reverse primer, 5’- GTTATGCAACAGGGACCATC-3’); IGF2 (forward primer, 5’- CTGAATTCTCTAGAACGGGCATTCAGCA-3’; reverse primer, 5’- GGGGGCAGGGAGCCGCAGAG-3’); SCF (forward primer, 5’-ATAGGCTAGCAGCACAGACTTCCCTCCACAAAGT-3’; reverse primer, 5’-CATGGAAGCTTTGTGGCGACTCCGTTTAGCT-3’); and VEGFA (forward primer, 5’-GCGTGTCTCTGGACAGAGTTT-3’; reverse primer, 5’- AGCCTCAGCCCTTCCACA-3’).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis of Collagen I, α-SMA, and MyD88

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue and cell extracts were analyzed with the following primary antibodies: anti-collagen I, anti-α-SMA, anti-MyD88 (Abcam, Cambridge, Cambs, UK), anti-p-JAK1/2, anti-JAK1/2, anti-p-STAT1, anti-STAT1 antibodies (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA). HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and goat anti-rabbit IgG were used as secondary antibodies. Blots were scanned using a Clinx Science Instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cells and Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown on coverslips and incubated with an anti-STAT1 antibody (14994S, Cell Signaling Technology). Embedded mouse tissue was incubated with an anti-CD8a antibody (14–0081-82, Invitrogen). Both followed by incubation with corresponding secondary antibodies for 60 min at 37 °C in the dark. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Photographs were taken with an Olympus LEXT OLS4500 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying STAT1 Translocation in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded onto glass coverslips and incubated with TI (each 10 ng/mL) in the absence or presence of BHSST (500 μg/mL) for 30 min. The cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 100% acetone, blocked in 0.5% bovine serum albumin, and incubated with anti-STAT1 antibody (Cell Signaling Tech.) for 1 h at room temperature. Then, FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used as a secondary antibody. The immunostained cells were mounted with medium containing DAPI and visualized by use of an Olympus FLUOVIEW FV10i confocal microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

STAT1 Chromatin Immunoprecipitation in BMDMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assay was performed with SimpleChIP® Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (Cell Signaling Technology). In brief, BMDMs treated with 100 U/ml IFN‐β for 4 h were fixed in 1% formaldehyde for 10 min. Chromatin was fragmented by using micrococcal nuclease (Cell Signaling Technology), and the cell membrane was broken down by Bioruptor (Diagenode). 2% of samples were aliquoted for input controls, and the remaining samples were incubated with anti‐STAT1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) and control antibodies (Cell signaling Technology) overnight at 4°C with rotation. The precipitated DNA was purified and conducted qPCR assay by using iQ SYBR Green Supermix with the primers listed in the Reagents and Tools Table. The data were analyzed by the following formula: % of input = (input dilution factor/bound dilution factor) × 2 (input CT − bound CT) × 100 and then normalized to IgG control as 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Porcine cell lines and PRV strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Porcine alveolar macrophages cells (3D4/21, ATCC® CRL-2843™), porcine kidney cells (PK-15, ATCC® CCL-33™), porcine testis cells (ST, ATCC® CRL-1746™) were stored in the laboratory. 3D4/21 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; LONSERA) and 0.1 mM non-essential amino acid (NAA), PK-15 cells and ST cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Corning, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; LONSERA) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Two PRV strains (ZJ01 and LA) were used. PRV was proliferated in PK-15 cells and was stored at − 80 °C. The highly pathogenic PRV strain ZJ01, which is maintained in our laboratory, was used for all experiments. The PRV strain LA was also used, as specifically mentioned by name (LA, a classical strain).
Anti-PRV gB-protein monoclonal antibody (1B1, prepared and stored in our laboratory), anti-GAPDH antibody (Proteintech, USA), anti-P-STAT1 antibody (Cell Signal Technology, USA), anti-STAT1 antibody (Cell Signal Technology, USA), anti-p-JAK1 antibody (Affinity, USA) and anti-JAK1 antibody (Affinity, USA) were used in the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Analysis of STAT1 in HaCaT Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HaCaT cells were seeded onto glass coverslips and incubated with TI in the absence or presence of CSYJE (500 μg/mL) for 30 min. The cells were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde and 100 % acetone, blocked in 0.5 % bovine serum albumin, and incubated with anti-STAT1 antibody (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) for 1 h at room temperature. Then, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used as a secondary antibody. The immunostained cells were mounted with medium containing 4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and visualized using an Olympus FLUOVIEW FV10i confocal microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

STAT1 Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assay was performed with the ChIP-IT® High Sensitivity kit (Active Motif, USA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Briefly, cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde followed by incubation in glycine stop-fix solution. Then, the cells were lysed with the lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail and deacetylase inhibitors. Purified chromatin was sonicated and incubated with an indicated immunoprecipitation antibody anti-STAT1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, 14994). The resultant immune-precipitate was subjected to qPCR amplification of putative Stat1 binding sequences using specifically designed primers. The value of qPCR was normalized with input DNA for comparison. The following primers were used for STAT1 binding site 1: forward CATGCCAATGATATTCACGA and reverse TATGTAATGGATTTGCTCGAA, STAT1 binding site 2: forward GTCACAGAAAACAGCGTCT and reverse CTGTTTTGAACTTCCCGGACA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ChIP Assay for STAT1 Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assay was performed using a ChIP assay kit (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the cells were incubated in 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature to crosslink their DNA. The cells were lysed in lysis buffer, sonicated to generate DNA fragments less than 500 base pairs in length and then diluted by ten folds in ChIP Dilution Buffer. Before immunoprecipitation, nuclear extracts were pre-cleared with 50% protein G-Sepharose slurry, goat normal serum, and sheared salmon sperm DNA for 2 h at 4 °C. Anti-STAT1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) was then added to form complexes with STAT1 protein and associated chromatin. These immunocomplexes were recovered by protein G-Sepharose beads, and the associated DNA was purified by extraction with phenol/chloroform. Specific primers forward 5′- ACGGATTTGCTAATTTTAAGGTAGT -3′ and reverse 5′- TCAGTCAATTGTAGCAGAACGTA -3′ were used to measure the enrichment of the putative STAT1-binding site in the C13orf25 promoter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!