The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Phusion hot start flex dna polymerase

Manufactured by New England Biolabs
Sourced in United States

Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase is a high-fidelity DNA polymerase designed for various PCR applications. It exhibits robust performance and offers enhanced specificity and sensitivity for reliable amplification of DNA templates.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

57 protocols using phusion hot start flex dna polymerase

1

nextRAD Genotyping-by-Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from the 190 individuals was converted into nextRAD genotyping-by-sequencing libraries by SNPsaurus, LLC as in [41 (link)]. Genomic DNA was first fragmented with Nextera reagent (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), which also ligates short adapter sequences to the ends of the fragments. The Nextera reaction was scaled down to fragment 3 ng of genomic DNA (the kit is optimized to fragment 50 ng). Fragmented DNA was then amplified using the Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA) for 25 cycles at 75°C, with one of the primers matching the adapter and extending 8 nucleotides into the genomic DNA with the selective sequence TGCAGGAG. Thus, only fragments starting with a sequence that can be hybridized by the selective sequence of the primer will be efficiently amplified. The nextRAD libraries were sequenced on a HiSeq 4000 with two lanes of 150 bp reads (University of Oregon). All sequencing reads were uploaded to the NCBI SRA database (BioProject ID: PRJNA545461).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GUIDE-seq Off-target Site Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U2OS cells were transfected with Cas9 and gRNA expression plasmids, in addition to the GUIDE-seq dsODN as described above. Off-targets sites identified by CIRCLE-seq were amplified from the isolated U2OS genomic DNA using Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) with primers listed in Supplementary Table 6. Triplicates of PCR products were generated from each transfection condition with 100 ng of genomic DNA as the input for each PCR. PCR products were normalized in concentration, pooled into different libraries corresponding to different transfection conditions, and purified with Ampure XP magnetic beads (Agencourt). Illumina Tru-seq deep-sequencing libraries were constructed using 500 ng of each pooled samples (KAPA Biosystems), quantified by real-time PCR (KAPA Biosystems), and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying CRISPR-Cas9 Mutagenesis Frequencies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify mutagenesis frequencies at desired genomic loci, T7E1 assays were performed as previously described30 (link). Briefly, on- or off-target sites were amplified from ~100 ng of genomic DNA using Phusion Hot-Start Flex DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 2. An Agencourt Ampure XP cleanup (Beckman Coulter Genomics) was performed prior to the denaturation and annealing of ~200 ng of the PCR product, followed by digestion with T7E1 (New England Biolabs). Purified digestion products were quantified using a QIAxcel capillary electrophoresis instrument (Qiagen) to approximate the mutagenesis frequencies induced by Cas9-sgRNA complexes. P values for comparisons between SpCas9 variants were calculated using a one-sided t-test with equal variances and adjusted for multiple comparisons using the method of Benjamini and Hochberg (Supplementary Table 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring CRISPR-Cas9 Mutagenesis Frequencies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Roughly 72 hr post-transfection, genomic DNA was extracted from U2OS cells using the Agencourt DNAdvance Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Beckman Coulter Genomics), and T7 endonuclease I (T7E1) assays were performed as previously described26 (link). Briefly, 600–800 nt amplicons surrounding on-target sites were amplified from ~100 ng of genomic DNA using Phusion Hot-Start Flex DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, NEB) using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 3. PCR products were visualized (using a QIAxcel capillary electrophoresis instrument, Qiagen), and purified (Agencourt Ampure XP cleanup, Beckman Coulter Genomics), Denaturation and annealing of ~200 ng of the PCR product was followed by digestion with T7EI (NEB). Digestion products were purified (Ampure) and quantified (QIAxcel) to approximate the mutagenesis frequencies induced by Cas9-sgRNA complexes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Monitoring Mitochondrial Calcium Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SH-SY5Y cells (ATCC) were cultured and transfected 24 h later using the calcium-phosphate precipitation protocol22 (link). The cells were co-transfected with the mitochondrial calcium reporter Cepia2-MT (Addgene plasmid # 58218), a pLKO.1 plasmid harboring validated shRNA targeted against the 3ʹUTR region of endogenous SLC8B1-NCLX (Sigma Aldrich, Mission shRNA TRC number 5045), and a plasmid to express human WT NCLX (Addgene #75216) or the NCLXP367S variant. Note that WT and P367S NCLX inserts are insensitive to the shRNA construct because they lack the 3ʹUTR of endogenous NCLX. The NCLXP367S variant was generated by site-directed mutagenesis using Phusion® Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) using the forward primer 5ʹ CATCTGGTTATCAGCTCCCTGGTTGTGGTC 3ʹ and reverse primer 5ʹ GACCACAACCAGGGAGCTGATAACCAGATG 3ʹ. The cells were first bathed in Ringer solution44 (link), which was replaced with calcium-free Ringer’s solution supplemented with 100 µM ATP23 (link). The resultant mitochondrial calcium signals were imaged (480 nm/535 nm excitation/emission). Measured values were normalized by the average baseline throughout (ΔF/F0) and were averaged across multiple cells in the field of view. The rate of calcium efflux was calculated by linearly fitting the change in the fluorescence after the peak for 150 s23 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CRISPR off-target analysis by deep sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted deep sequencing experiments were performed as previously described16 (link). On-target, GUIDE-seq identified off-target, and potential off-target loci predicted using Cas-OFFinder21 (link) were PCR amplified using Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) with the primers listed in Supplementary Table 5. A high-throughput library preparation kit (KAPA BioSystems) was used to generate dual-indexed Tru-seq libraries that were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer. Amplicons with less than 5000 mapping read counts were excluded from the analysis. P-values were calculated by fitting a negative binomial regression model comparing indel rates between nuclease treated and control samples. To avoid model fitting issues when all control samples report zero reads, 1 count was added to each member of the set of observed read counts. Deep sequencing data and the results of statistical tests are reported in Supplementary Table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Single-cell RNA-seq library preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One microgram of RNA was used for cDNA production using the qScript Flex cDNA synthesis kit (95049, Quanta) and a gene-specific primer containing library 3′ adapter and part of the Illumina RD2 region. The entire cDNA reaction was diluted into 100 mL second strand reaction with a primer containing a unique molecular identifier (UMI), library 5′ adapter and part of the Illumina RD1 region. The second strand reaction was carried for a single cycle using Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase (NEB, M0535), purified using AMpure beads at a 1.2:1 beads:sample ratio and eluted in ddH2O. Product was used for amplification with barcoded primers, and the amplified libraries were purified by two-sided AMpure purification; First with a 0.5:1 beads:sample ratio followed by a 0.7:1 ratio. Libraries were sequenced a NextSeq 500 or NovaSeq 6000 machine to obtain 150 nt single-end reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Constructing a CRISPR sgRNA Library

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oligonucleotide pool targeting 53 candidate genes from profiled heterogeneity and controls (ten individual sgRNAs per gene) was customized at CustomArray, Inc. Then, the oligo pool was annealed and subcloned into lentiCRISPRv2 (Addgene, 52961) backbone using the Gibson Assembly Kit (NEB) and electroporation according to the protocol from Zhang’s lab72 (link). Library representation was maintained for at least 1000× coverage at each step of the process. To qualify the sgRNA representation, the constructed library was amplified by two-step PCRs using Phusion® Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase (NEB, M0535L), in which the second step of PCR was conducted using the PCR amplicon from the first PCR as template. The primers for the first step of PCR are 5′-AATGGACTATCATATGCTTACCGTAACTTGAAAGTATTTCG-3′ (Forward) and 5′-TAGGCACCGGATCAATTGCCGAC-3′ (Reverse). The primers for the step of PCR are 5′-(1–9 bp of variable length sequence)TCTTGTGGAAAGGACGAAACACCG-3′ (Forward) and 5′-(1–9 bp of variable length sequence)TGTGGGCGATGTGCGCTCT-3′ (Reverse). The amplicon was sent for next-generation sequencing (NGS) at Mingma Technologies using illumina Hiseq X10 (3.3 M reads, 1 G data) to qualify sgRNA library distribution before screening72 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gene Deletion and Plasmid Modification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primers used in this work are provided in Table 3 and were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). PCR products of gene deletions and plasmid modifications were validated using Sanger sequencing at Functional Biosciences (Madison, WI). Sequencing results were analyzed using Benchling. All Sanger sequencing products were generated with Q5 High-Fidelity polymerase (NEB), Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA polymerase (NEB), or OneTaq DNA polymerase (NEB). Diagnostic PCRs were performed with OneTaq DNA polymerase (NEB) or GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega). Whole-plasmid sequencing was performed by Plasmidsaurus (Eugene, OR) when noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Single-Cell YY1 Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC B cells (B220+CD95+GL7+) were sorted into
sterile water (5–10 µl) as one cell per well in 96-well plates. Cells were
lysed by 3 freeze-thaw cycles followed by heating to 98°C for 10 minutes. PCR to
amply the YY1 locus was performed using Phusion hot start flex DNA
polymerase (New England Biolabs) and primers: P1
(5’-ACCTGGTCTATCGAAAGGAAGCAC-3’), P2
(5’-GCTTCGCCTATTCCTCGCTCATAA-3’), and P4
(5’-CCAAAGTTCGAAACCTGCTTTCCT-3’) as described (42 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!