The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

S plus 8

Manufactured by TIBCO Software
Sourced in United States

S-Plus 8.2 is a statistical software package developed by TIBCO Software. It provides a range of statistical analysis and data visualization tools for researchers and data analysts. The software's core function is to enable users to perform statistical modeling, data exploration, and reporting tasks.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using s plus 8

1

Analyzing Resistance Values in OSA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resistance values were log-transformed [log(R v)] before analysis to stabilize the variance and to test for log linear relationships between Rv and CBSRI0.6. Linear mixed effects models were then fitted to the data (S-PLUS 8, TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA; two-tailed test, P Ͻ 0.05) with subject as a random effect, CBSRI0.6 as both a random and fixed effect, and with group (OSA vs. control) and its interaction with CBSRI0.6 as fixed effects.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using statistical software (either PRISM 6.05, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, or S‐PLUS 8, TIBCO Software, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Further details can be found in Data S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Agreement of Provisional Diagnoses and ToO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We checked the agreement and disagreement of the provisional primary diagnoses submitted by each of the two clinicians and the putative primary stated by the ToO test. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient with 95% CI was used to assess the degree of agreement between two clinicians and ToO result. McNemar’s test was used to test the marginal homogeneity of the two clinicians agreeing with the results based on the ToO test; that is, whether they have the same tendency to agree or disagree with the results of ToO.
All tests were two-sided and P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were carried out using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), S-Plus 8.2 (TIBCO Software Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Analysis for Delayed Disease-Free

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were used for continuous and categorical variables separately. Kruskal-Wallis test and either chi-square test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate, were used for the group comparison for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the effect of categorical and continuous covariates, respectively, on DDFS. All computations were carried out in SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and Splus 8.2 (TIBCO Software Inc, Palo Alto, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of CAR T-cell Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Summary statistics including mean, standard deviation, median, and range for continuous variables and frequency counts and percentages for categorical variables. Fisher exact test or χ2 test were used to evaluate the association between two categorical variables. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to evaluate the difference in continuous variables between groups. We calculated ICU and hospital length of stay using (LOS) as the time interval from admission to discharge or death. LOS was reported with median and range. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the rate and median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Overall survival time was calculated from CAR T-cell infusion date to death or last follow-up date. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year after infusion and median follow-up time for the censored observations (alive patients) was reported. Progression free survival was calculated from time of CAR T-cell infusion to disease progression or death, whichever happened first. Considering the small amount of events occurring after 1 year after infusion, patients with the last follow up or event occurring after one year post infusion, were censored at one year. Statistical software SAS (version 9.4, Cary, North Carolina) and S-Plus 8.2 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA) were used for the analyses. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Survival Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient characteristics were tabulated and compared between groups by using the Chi square test or Fisher exact test as appropriate for categorical variables and by the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted to examine the relationship between death in the ICU and clinical characteristics. Patients who were lost to follow-up or alive were censored at their dates of last contact. The Kaplan–Meier product limit method was used to estimate the survival outcomes of all patients by groups; the log-rank statistic was used to compare groups. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to determine the association of patient and clinical characteristics with OS. Variables that had significant univariate log-rank p values were candidates for the multivariate model. Results were expressed in hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant; all tests were two-sided. Statistical analyses were carried out by using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and S-Plus 8.2 (TIBCO Software Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Correlation of Calcium Markers in Myeloma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary objective was to determine the correlation between corrected calcium and ionized calcium in each group using the Spearman correlation coefficient. To illustrate correlation, scatterplots of calcium measurements were fitted with locally-weighted smoothing regression curves [32 ]. Secondary analyses included sensitivity and specificity of corrected calcium in detecting hypercalcemia using the ranges defined above, where a true hypercalcemia was defined by elevated ionized calcium ≥ 5.33mg/dL. Additionally, multiple linear regression was performed to assess the influence of several myeloma-related variables (serum albumin, phosphorus, creatinine, paraprotein, free kappa light chains, free lambda light chains, and MM immunoglobulin type) on corrected calcium measurements. Continuous variables were compared between patient groups via two-sample t-test (or Mann-Whitney test) and discrete variables were evaluated for association via Fisher’s exact test (or Chi-square test). Statistical significance was defined as p-value < 0.05. Statistical software SAS 9.3 (SAS, Cary, NC), R, and S-Plus 8.2 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA) were used for the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Factors Influencing Anesthesia and Pain Scores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients' demographics, treatment, and clinical outcomes were summarized through descriptive statistics. The Wilcoxon rank sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare location parameters of continuous distributions between or among patient groups. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between two categorical variables. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the effects of important covariates on regional anesthesia use and highest or average PACU pain score using 5 as the cutoff point. Statistical software SAS 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC) and Splus 8.2 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA) were used for all the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Progression-Free Survival in Frontline Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics are provided, including mean, standard deviation, median, and range for continuous variables, and frequency counts and percentages for categorical variables. The association between categorical variables was evaluated using the χ2 or Fisher exact test, and the difference in a continuous variable between patient groups was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were adverse events and overall survival (OS).
PFS time was calculated from the date of initiation of frontline therapy to relapse or progression of the disease, death, or last follow-up. OS time was defined as the time from the start of frontline therapy to death or last follow-up. Data of patients who were alive during follow-up were censored at the last follow-up date. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS, and the difference in PFS/OS was evaluated using the log-rank test. The median follow-up time was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method.11 (link) Univariable Cox proportional hazards model was fitted for PFS on continuous covariates. Statistical software SAS 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC), S-Plus 8.2 (TIBCO Software Inc, Palo Alto, CA), and SPSS 21 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) were used for all the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Utility of Early PET/CT in Salvage Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this pilot study exploring the utility of early PET/CT, descriptive statistics defined baseline characteristics and treatment response/outcomes. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the association between EOT response and other categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time-to-event endpoints. Log-rank test was used to evaluate the difference in time-to-event outcomes between patient groups. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as time from start of salvage treatment to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death due to any cause. Disease specific survival (DSS) was defined as time from start of salvage treatment to death secondary to lymphoma. A two-sided P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical software used included SAS 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC), S-Plus 8.2 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA), and R 4.0.2 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!