The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

137 protocols using imagej

1

Cryofracture and SEM Analysis of SFRN Filaments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fabricated samples were cryofractured by placing them in liquid nitrogen for 10 min, and then the cross-section structure was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-3700N, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were firstly mounted onto aluminum stubs with carbon tabs and then coated with Au (Agar Auto Sputter Coater, Essex, UK) with a coating current of 40 mA for 60 s. The short carbon fibre in SFRN filaments was observed by optical microscope (Axioscope, Zeiss, Germany), and its dimension was measured by ImageJ software (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological Analysis of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Femoral or sternum bones, spleens, and livers were fixed in neutrally buffered formalin at room temperature for >24 hours, embedded in paraffin, cut into sections using a microtome, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin or anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO), according to standard protocols. Cell morphology was evaluated using an Axiovert 200M microscope (Zeiss) and analyzed pictures through ImageJ (ImageJ, RRID:SCR_003070; ref. 63 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Imaging and Analysis of Bacterial Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilm formation and structures were evaluated by CLSM (Zeiss LSM 900). Static biofilms were prepared by inoculating overnight bacterial cultures at a final concentration of OD600 ~ 0.01 and were cultivated for 24 h at 37°C. Competition biofilm assay was prepared by mixing PAO1 with PAO1 and its mutant at 1:1 vol:vol with final bacterial concentration at OD600 ~ 0.01, followed by cultivation. CLSM 3D images were captured by LSM900 and analyzed by Imaris (Imaris, bitplane), ImageJ (ImageJ.nih.gov/ij/">https://ImageJ.nih.gov/ij/), and Zen (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Confocal Microscopy and FRAP Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zeiss LSM 880 confocal system equipped with Airyscan detector, using 488, 561, and 633-nm laser lines for green, red, and far-red fluorescent probes, respectively. Images were taken through a ×63 oil objective (numerical aperture [NA] 1.40). Images were captured using Carl Zeiss ZEN 2.3 software package (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH 1997–2015) and were processed using ImageJ (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, USA).
FRAP experiments were performed on a Zeiss LSM780 NLO system using a 63x oil immersion objective (PlanApo, 1.4 N.A.). DPSS laser at 561 nm was used for the excitation of mRFP/mCherry. Circular regions 5 µm in diameter were photobleached by pulsed Ti:Sapphire laser (Coherent Chameleon Vision II) at 720 nm to achieve rapid, extensive bleaching. Images were acquired at 1 frame/s using Carl Zeiss ZEN 2.3 software package (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH 1997–2015) and were processed using ImageJ (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Vivo Imaging of C. albicans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C. albicans expressing CaHS1 plasmids KB2636 (CaHS1), KB2669 (HS1-M7A), KB2671 (HS1-M7A,H102A = DM) and a vector-only plasmid were grown overnight in SC media at 37 °C. Cells were washed in PBS and resuspended at an O.D. 600 = 0.7 in PBS. Cells were immediately loaded onto a CellASIC Onix Y04C yeast microfluidics plate. Cells were imaged on a Zeiss LSM 710 NLO confocal microscope with a 40X 1.3 numerical aperture oil-immersion objective. A 488 nm laser was used to excite GFP and a 561 nm laser was used to excite mKATE2. Emission filters for GFP and mKATE2 were 493 – 536 nm and 566 – 685 nm respectively. C. albicans expressing the vector only plasmid was used for background subtraction. Images were collected with Zeiss software and analyzed with ImageJ. (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, ImageJ.nih.gov/ij/">https://ImageJ.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2018.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Confocal Imaging of Pituitary Gland

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent images were obtained using an LSM710 Confocal Microscope (Zeiss) with 25× (for adult pituitary) and 40× (for juvenile pituitary) objectives. Lasers with wavelength of 405 (DAPI), 555 (TAMRA; Alexa-555), 633 (Cy5) and 488 (FITC; Alexa-488) nm were used. Channels were acquired sequentially to prevent cross-signaling of fluorophores. Due to the size of the adult pituitaries, the image acquisition was done from the dorsal and ventral sides of the pituitary with some overlaps in the middle. In conjunction with the microscope, ZEN software (v2009, Zeiss) was used to process the images, and ImageJ (1.52p; http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) was used for processing z-projections from confocal image stacks. The dorsal and ventral stacks of adult pituitaries were aligned using HWada (ImageJ/635/" xlink:type="simple">https://signaling.riken.jp/en/en-tools/ImageJ/635/) and StackReg plugins (http://bigwww.epfl.ch/thevenaz/stackreg/), before presenting them in orthogonal views.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Wound Healing Assay with Chemotherapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Passage 4 un-pooled HCAECs (Sigma-Aldrich, United Kingdom) were seeded in 24-well plates with MEGM (Sigma-Aldrich, United Kingdom) either with or without 5% pooled pre- or post-exercise intervention serum and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24-h, as outlined above. HCAECs were mechanically scraped using a 200 µL pipette to create a vertical wound in the confluent monolayer, washed with 200 µL PBS to remove debris, and 500 µL fresh MEGM (Sigma-Aldrich, United Kingdom) added to each well. HCAECs were then exposed to relevant concentration of chemotherapy drugs as described before.
Cells were imaged using Primovert Axiocam ERc5s microscope (ZEISS, Germany) using ×4 magnification at 0, 3-, 4-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 48-h and analysed using ImageJ (1. x, Java, United States). Rate of wound closure was determined by the area of the wound plotted as a function of time. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using known equations (Jonkman et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Imaging of Cellular Structures using Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging of SCMS, HEK293 cells, and hippocampal neurons was done on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal laser‐scanning microscope, equipped with an oil immersion objective, numerical aperture 1.4, 63× (Zeiss). For excitation of YFP, a 488 nm argon‐krypton laser was used, with detection using a 505–550 nm bandpass emission filter. Red dyes were excited using a 543 nm helium‐neon laser, and emission was detected using a 560–615 nm emission filter. Far red fluorophores were excited using a 633 nm laser light from a helium‐neon (HeNe) laser source, and emitted fluorescent light was filtered using a long pass filter.
Images were acquired at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels, 8‐bit pr. pixel, with 4‐, 8‐, or 16‐line averaging scans. Images were treated using ImageJ or Zen (Zeiss software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lens Capsule Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence images were quantified by determining the MFI of lens capsule–associated tissue viewed in 3 randomly chosen confocal images from biologically independent samples using ImageJ (v1.52P, NIH) (73 (link)). The average number of lens capsule–associated nuclei/section was analyzed by ImageJ using 6 randomly chosen immunofluorescence images from each PCS time point from at least 3 biologically independent samples as described (73 (link), 74 (link)).
The diameter of adult lenses was determined by dissecting both lenses from 3 WT and 3 β8ITG-cKO mice and photographing them in brightfield using a Zeiss STEMI SV 11 dissecting microscope. The diameter of each lens was measured in 2 perpendicular axes using ImageJ, then averaged for statistical analysis.
All statistics were assessed using either 2-tailed Student’s t test (corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm-Šídák method) or 1-way/2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test using GraphPad Prism 8.3.0/9.2.0. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Examination of gene expression by whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed essentially as previously described [33 (link)–37 (link)]. Prior to mRNA in situ hybridization analyses, embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C or 4–5 hours at RT with gentle agitation on a rotating platform. Embryos were permeabilized in 10 μg/ml proteinase K for 10 seconds (10–12 hpf embryos), 30 seconds (14–17 hpf embryos), 3 minutes (24–32 hpf embryos), or 1 hour (3–4 days post fertilization embryos) at RT.
Following in situ hybridization, embryos were manually deyolked, and cleared in 30%, 50%, and 70% glycerol/PBS. Mounted in situ hybridized embryos and live Tg(gata1:DsRed)sd2Tg embryos were photographed using a Zeiss AxioImager Z1 compound microscope with an Axiocam HR digital camera. Mounted Tg(kdrl:GFP)la116Tg embryos were photographed using a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope. Whole embryos were photographed using an Olympus stereoscope with a QImaging micropublisher camera. Images were assembled in ImageJ or Zen (Zeiss), and figures were assembled in Photoshop (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!