The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xcalibur

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany, France, Canada, Italy, United Kingdom, Slovenia, Switzerland

Xcalibur is a powerful data acquisition and analysis software for Thermo Fisher Scientific mass spectrometry systems. It enables users to control instrument operation, acquire data, and perform data analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

513 protocols using xcalibur

1

Isotopic Tracing of Parasite Metabolism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RH and ΔACL/iΔACS intracellular parasites were incubated in the absence of Shld-1 for 16 h and simultaneously labelled with either 10 mM U-13C-glucose or 2 mM U-13C-acetate (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories). Per sample, 108 parasites were isolated and purified as described above. FAs were extracted, derivatised and analysed as described previously [16 (link)]. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were identified based on retention times and the library integrated in Xcalibur (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The abundance was determined based on the peak intensity relative to the cholesterol signal intensity in each sample. Abundance of the C14:0 and C26:1-FAME mass isotopologues (m/z 242–256; m/z 376–390) was determined using Xcalibur (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and OpenChrom software. The extent of 13C-labelling was determined using the Excel (Microsoft) software following correction for the occurrence of natural isotopes as described by Zamboni et al. [83 (link)]. Abundance data represent the average of 6 biological replicates, and labelling data represents the average of 3 biological replicates. Statistical significance of differences in labelling and abundance were assessed by t-test. Standard deviation and p values are indicated in the figure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Lipidomic Analysis of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were acquired using Xcalibur (v. 4.1, ThermoFisher Scientific). Targeted processing was performed by Xcalibur and unbiased analysis using Compound Discoverer (v. 3.1, ThermoFisher Scientific). For unbiased analysis, metabolites were verified using the high resolution m/z LIPID MAPS Lipidomics Gateway database (https://lipidmaps.org/) with reference to fragmentation data where appropriate. Where necessary, peak areas corresponding to metabolite levels were normalised to internal standards or total ion content and presented as relative areas. All data were collated and targeted quantitation was processed using Excel (2016 version, Microsoft).
Files associated with the raw data for Figs 5D and E, and EV4 are supplied as Dataset files (Dataset EV2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Headspace Compound Analysis with 3-Nonanone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Significant data selection by the Xcalibur (a shareware of Thermo Electron Corporation, Xcalibur.updatestar.com/)">https://Xcalibur.updatestar.com/) and quantitative analysis of the headspace compounds with internal standard 3-nonanone (0.8 µg µL−1) were performed as lab self-built method (Feng et al., 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ESI-MS/MS Analysis of F2 Fraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For further confirming the metabolite of F2 fraction and elucidating its molecular structure, the ESI-MS/MS (LTQ XL, Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) analysis was carried out by following the protocol described earlier [36 (link)] with a few minor modifications. Briefly, 2 mg of fraction F2 was dissolved in 1 mL of methanol: acetonitrile [80:20, v/v] mixture and run, using direct injection mode at 9 μL/min. The capillary temperature was set at 288 °C. The mass range was selected at m/z 100 to 1000 in positive ionization mode for data acquisition. The collision induced dissociation energy (CID) was manually selected in the range of 5 to 30 eV for obtaining favorable fragmentation. The sheath and auxiliary N2 gases were also adjusted manually. For the data analysis and structural elucidation, Xcalibur™ (version 3.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and ChemDraw (version Chem Draw Ultra 8.0, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) software were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Targeted LC-MS/MS for Metabolite Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC–MS/MS analyses were performed using a UHPLC system (Vanquish, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the UPLC BEH Amide column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm) coupled with the Q Exactive HFX mass spectrometer (Orbitrap MS, Thermo). The mobile phase consisted of 25 mmol/L ammonium acetate and 25 ammonia hydroxide in water (pH = 9.75) (A) and acetonitrile (B). The auto-sampler temperature was 4 °C, and the injection volume was 2 µL. The QE HFX mass spectrometer was used for its ability to acquire MS/MS spectra on information-dependent acquisition mode in the control of an acquisition software (Xcalibur, Thermo). In this mode, the acquisition software continuously evaluates the full scan MS spectrum. The ESI source conditions were set as follows: sheath gas flow rate, 30 Arb; Aux gas flow rate, 25 Arb; capillary temperature, 350 °C; full MS resolution, 60,000; MS/MS resolution, 7500; collision energy, 10/30/60 in NCE mode; and spray voltage, 3.6 kV (positive) or − 3.2 kV (negative).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mass Spectrometry of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spectra were collected on a modified QExactive hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific) optimized for transmission of high-mass complexes (68 (link)). Protein concentration was 15 μm by monomer. Capillary voltage was 1.4 kV in positive ion mode with source temperature 200 °C and S-lens RF 200%. UHV pressure (argon) was between 1.4 × 10−9 and 1.7 × 10−9 mbar. In-source trapping fragmentation voltage ranged from −150 to −180 V. Ion transfer optics were as follows: injection flatapole 10 V, inter-flatapole lens 8 V, bent flatapole 6 V, transfer multipole 4 V, C-trap entrance lens 3 V. Nitrogen was used in the HCD cell and HCD energy was 0 V for intact spectra and tuned for optimal dissociation of each protein for CID spectra, ranging from 200 to 230 V. Resolution was kept at 17,500 at m/z = 200 for a transient time of 64 ms and the noise threshold was set to 3. For CID spectra, groupings of 30 microscans were combined to improve signal quality. Data were visualized using Xcalibur (ThermoFisher Scientific) and calibrated manually according to expected peak positions for WT αB-crystallin. Calibrated CID data were processed using UniDec software, which allowed for stoichiometric assignment and post-hoc correction for dissociated subunits (62 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Oropharyngeal Metabolite Profiling via UHPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In both positive and negative-ion modes, all oropharyngeal samples were subjected to metabolite separation using a UHPLC system (Vanquish, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The target compounds were separated using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 µm) liquid chromatography column. Mobile phase A was an aqueous phase with a pH of 9.75. It contained 25 mmol/L of ammonium acetate and 25 mmol/L of ammonia hydroxide, whereas mobile phase B comprised acetonitrile. The temperature of the sample tray was 4°C, and the injection volume was 2μL.
The organic phase was injected into the column at 30°C. The elution gradients were set to 95% B, 0–0.5 min; 95–65% B, 0.5–7.0 min; 65–40% B, 7.0–8.0 min; 40% B, 8.0–9.0 min; 40–95% B, 9.0–9.1 min; and 95% B, 9.1–12.0 min. The data was gathered using Xcalibur (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on the Orbitrap Exploris 120 mass spectrometer, which can collect primary and secondary mass spectrometry data in the information-dependent acquisition mode. Other conditions for the electrospray ionization source were established as follows: capillary temperature, 320°C; collision energy, 10/30/60 in NCE mode; MS/MS resolution, 15,000; full MS resolution, 60,000; auxiliary gas flow rate, 15 Arb; and sheath gas flow rate, 50 Arb. The spray voltage was set to 3.8 and -3.4 kV for the positive-ion and negative-ion modes, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Untargeted Metabolomics by HRAM-LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Untargeted liquid chromatography high-resolution accurate mass spectrometry (LC-HRAM) analysis was performed on a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) coupled to a binary pump UHPLC (UltiMate3000, Thermo Scientific). Full MS spectra were obtained at 70 000 resolution (200 m/z) with a scan range of 50–750 m/z. Full MS followed by ddMS2 scans were obtained at 35 000 (MS1) and 17 500 resolutions (MS2) with a 1.5 m/z isolation window and a stepped NCE (20, 40, 60). Samples were maintained at 4 °C before injection. The injection volume was 10 μL. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Hypersil Gold 5 μm, 50 mm × 2.1 mm C18 column (Thermo Scientific) maintained at 30 °C using a solvent gradient method. Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water. Solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The gradient method used was 0–1 min (20% B to 60% B), 1–2 min (60% B to 95% B), 2–4 min (95% B), 4–4.1 min (95% B to 20% B), 4.1–5 min (20% B). The flow rate was 0.5 mL min−1. Sample acquisition was performed by Xcalibur (Thermo Scientific). Data analysis was performed with Compound Discoverer 3.1 (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Amyloid-beta Peptide Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aβ1-42 (California Peptide) was resuspended in dymethylsulfoxide, diluted to 100 µM in phosphate-buffered saline and then exchanged into 150 ammonium acetate at a final concentration of 10 µM. The sample was directly infused into a Q Exactive-HF Extended Mass Range (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a nano ESI source [9 (link)]. All resulting spectra were deconvoluted with Xtract (S/N:3, Fit factor:45, Remainder:80) in Xcalibur (Thermo Fisher Scientific) followed by a manual calibration (12 ppm). Calibrated masses were input into ProSight Lite and TDValidator (Proteinaceous, max ppm tolerance: 10 ppm; cluster tolerance: 0.35; charge range: 1-5; minimum score: 0.5; SNR cutoff: 3; BRAIN algorithm; minimum size: 2), with an average mass error of 0.97±1.496 Da.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteomic Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were separated from proteolytic fragments by liquid chromatography (C18 column, 5 μm; pore size 100 Å; Phe-nomenex, USA) and analyzed by mass spectrometry (LCMS). The hydrolysate was fractionated on an Acclaim PepMap RSLC (50 μm × 15 cm) C18 column (2 μm; pore size, 100 Å; Thermo Scientific, USA) equipped with an Acclaim PepMap 100 (75 μm × 2 cm) C18 concentrating precolumn (3 μm; pore size, 100 Å) using an Easy Flow Nanotube nLC 1000 system (Thermo Scientific). The optained peptides were analyzed using mass spectrometer with the orbital trap (Orbitrap Elite; Thermo Scientific, Germany). Panoramic spectra were recorded in the m/z range of 300 to 2000 with a resolution of 240,000. An HCD camera was used to perform ion fragmentation. A resolution of 60,000 was adopted to record the fragmentation spectra. The data were processed using the Xcalibur (Thermo Scientific) and PEAKS Studio 7.5 (Bioinformatics Solution Inc., Canada) programs. In accordance with the search parameters for the identification of the peptide, PEAKS Studio 7.5 software was used [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!