The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Physical property measurement system (ppms)

Manufactured by Quantum Design
Sourced in United States

The Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) is a versatile laboratory instrument designed for advanced materials characterization. The PPMS provides a controlled environment for measuring various physical properties of samples, such as electrical, magnetic, and thermal properties. It offers a wide range of measurement capabilities, including temperature and magnetic field control, to enable researchers to investigate the behavior of materials under different conditions. The PPMS is a valuable tool for researchers in fields such as condensed matter physics, materials science, and nanotechnology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

417 protocols using physical property measurement system (ppms)

1

Magneto-Electrical Transport Measurements on NWs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The magneto-electrical transport measurements on the NWs were carried out using a ''Physical Property Measurement System'' (PPMS), from Quantum Design equipped with a helium-3 refrigerator insert.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Magnetic and Electronic Properties Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetization at external magnetic fields μ 0 H ranging from 0.01 T to 7 T (temperature range 1.8 K-400 K) was measured in a SQUID magnetometer (MPMS XL-7, Quantum Design) on polycrystalline samples. The electrical resistance was recorded by a four contact method using low-frequency alternating current (ACT option, PPMS, Quantum Design) on small barshapes pieces in zero field and in a field μ 0 H = 9 T. Heat capacity was determined by a relaxation method (HC option, PPMS, Quantum Design) in fields μ 0 H of 0, 3, 6, and 9 T.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Magnetic Characterization of NP-Loaded Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetic measurements were performed using a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) with a Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM). PS substrates filled with NPs were characterized after immobilization on a quartz support using adhesive Kapton film. Hysteresis loops were recorded at 300 and 5 K applying induction field of ±3T. The exchange bias Hex was determined from the hysteresis loop recorded at 5 K after cooling the sample from 300 K down to 5 K under an external field of 3T.
where Hc is the coercive field observed during the demagnetization process (second quadrant, experimentally: −125 mT) and Hc+ the coercive field observed during the magnetization (fourth quadrant, experimentally: 126 mT).
The pore filling factor Q, which characterizes the mass of NP loaded over a given surface area, was determined following Equation (2):
With Γ the saturation magnetization of the NPs (224 emu/gFeCo), Ms the saturation magnetization of the composite determined experimentally as the magnetization at 3T, and S the footprint area of the substrate, i.e., 16 mm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Magnetization Curves of Core/Shell Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetization curves were measured for dilute (~0.1 vol. %) dispersions of core/shell in eicosane (melting point 42 °C), using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The magnetometry system used in this work is a from Quantum Design, Inc., physical property measurement system (PPMS) with vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) option (Any mention of commercial products is for information only; it does not imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST). 9 T field-cooled hysteresis loops were recorded at 10 K to reveal evidence of exchange bias. Magnetization loops were measured at 5, 60, 200, and 300 K, at fields up to 9 T. The zero field-cooled magnetization was measured as a function of increasing temperature at 100 Oe. Dense assemblies were also measured, and were prepared by rapidly precipitating nanoparticles in gel capsules with the addition of 50% (by volume) ethanol. Ethanol and toluene were evaporated overnight leaving behind a dense assembly of particles. Due to rapid precipitation, these did now have the same long range stacking order (between particles) described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electrical Resistivity Measurement at High Pressure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electrical resistivity was measured at ambient and high pressure by the 4-terminal method using a Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) from Quantum Design with the lowest temperature of about 1.8 K. The resistivity under pressure was measured using a piston cylinder cell to generate pressure up to ~2.5 GPa and daphne 7373 as a pressure medium in PPMS. The pressure value in the sample was determined from the superconducting transition temperature Tc of Pb under pressure, using the relation P = (7.20 − Tc)/0.365. Note that when the 4.8 C/cm2 irradiated sample was set in the piston cell, even before pressure was applied, the resistivity value changed, probably due to cracks, so we have corrected it to the value before pressure was applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Magnetic Characterization of Fe(II) Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) equipped with a Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM), magnetization data were collected as a function of temperature (1.9 to 300 K) in applied fields of 0.1 T (1 kOe) and 0.5 T (5 kOe) for a 12.6 mg sample of [Fe(Me2Dt0)3][PF6]3 that was packed in a cylindrical sample holder (d = 2 mm), yielding a sample height of ≈ 2.5 mm. Diamagnetic correction was applied as described in a recent review article by Sproules.58 χD = χD(Fe3+) + 18χD(C) + 30χD(H) + 6χD (N, ring) + 6χD (S) + 3χD (P) + 18χD (F) = −10 + 18(−6.00) + 30(−2.93) + 6(−4.61) + 6(−15.0) + 3(−26.3) + 18(−6.3) = −515.86 × 10−6 emu mol−1.
Variable temperature NMR experiments were conducted using a Bruker AvanceIII 500 MHz NMR system utilizing a BVT3200 temperature control board and nitrogen evaporation system. Probe temperature was monitored with a standard Type T Thermocouple and temperature calibration was performed using deuterated methanol. Samples equilibrated for 10 minutes once the probe reached target temperatures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Magnetic Measurements of Pressed Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the magnetic measurements were performed on pressed pellets of the samples wrapped in Teflon tape. DC measurements and time decays were performed in a SQUID magnetometer. AC magnetic measurements were performed in a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS). The treatment of the ac data was done with a home-written program in MATLAB language.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Magnetic Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetic measurements were performed on a Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) from Quantum Design. All the samples were mounted in a Teflon tape and the anisotropic compounds were pressed into a pellet manually. DC magnetic measurements were carried out using vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) option. The sample's diamagnetism correction was estimated from Pascal's constants. AC magnetic measurements were performed using the ACMS mode. The DC magnetic data was fitted and simulated using Software Phi.19 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Temperature Dependent Transport and Magnetization in CeMnAsO1-xFx

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The temperature dependence of the DC electrical resistance, Seebeck coefficient and Hall resistivity of the CeyMnAsO1-xFx phases were recorded using a Quantum Design physical property measurement system (PPMS) between 4 and 300 K. The measurements were performed with both the 2-probe and 4-probe methods to ensure the transitions were not a result of instrumental error. From ∼20 K above TII, data were also recorded every 0.25 K in order to obtain high quality and reliable data around the transition and to fully map out the transition. The temperature and frequency dependence of the AC transport of Ce0.96MnAsO0.95F0.05, Ce0.97MnAsO0.95F0.05 and CeMnAsO0.0965F0.035 were also recorded between 4 K and 300 K on the PPMS with selected frequencies between 1 Hz and 1000 Hz. Magnetisation measurements of all samples were recorded on a Quantum Design SQUID Magnetometer in an applied field of 100 Oe after zero field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) at temperatures between 2–400 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Thermal and Structural Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purity and crystal structure of the samples were characterized by a PANalytical Empyrean Series 2 powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) with a Cu Kα source (λ = 1.54 Å). The morphology of the samples was observed by a TESCAN Vega3 SBH scanning electron microscope (SEM) (TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) and a ThermoFisher Scientific Talos L120C transmission electron microscope (TEM) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The pellet sample was cut into a typical dimension of 0.5 × 0.5 × 6 mm for the thermal conductivity measurement. The density (ρ) of the pellet sample was determined to be 4.27 g cm−3. A Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) (Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA) was employed to measure the thermal conductivity along the direction perpendicular to the cold-pressing direction. The specific heat of the sample from 2 to 300 K was measured with the PPMS. The room-temperature Raman measurement was carried out with a HORIBA LabRam (HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan) using a 532 nm laser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!