The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

210 protocols using m mlv rt

1

Reverse Transcription Protocol for miRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After total RNA extraction, complementary deoxyribonucleic acid was synthesized using 2 ng to 2 μg of total RNA by Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Reverse Transcriptase (M-MLV RT) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). Stem-loop reverse-transcriptase primer was added to total RNA (synthesized by RiboBio, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China). The volume was expanded to 24 μL with ribonuclease (RNase)-free water and mixed well. After incubation at 70°C for 10 minutes, the mixture was placed in an ice bath for 2 minutes. The following reagents were added to the mixture in sequence: 2 μL of RNase inhibitor, 8 μL of 5× M-MLV RT buffer, 2 μL of M-MLV RT reverse transcriptase (RNase H-), and 2 μL of dNTP mixture (Life Technologies) and RNase-free water (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Dalian, People’s Republic of China) to a final volume of 40 μL. The mixture was placed at 30°C for 10 minutes, followed by 42°C incubation for 1 hour, and then the mixture was placed at 70°C for 15 minutes. The product of reverse transcription was used as the template of PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of lncRNA Expression by RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse transcription was performed at 37 °C for 2 h in a total volume of 10 μL reaction solution containing 3 μg RNA, 0.5 μg oligo (dT), 1X moloney murine leukemia virus reverse trancscriptase (MMLV RT) buffer, 0.5 mm each dNTP, 0.1 mm dithiothreitol and 100 U MMLV RT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To validate the RNA‐seq data, we determined the expression levels of several selected lncRNA transcripts by real‐time quantitative PCR in both day5_ybx1+/+ and day5_ybx1−/−, including MSTRG12630.1, MSTRG24792.1, ENSDART00000171757, MSTRG.30533.1 and MSTRG.33365.1. To study the correlation between the selected lncRNA and their targets, including duox (NADPH oxidase), noxo1a (NADPH oxidase organizer) and ybx1, we determined the mRNA expression levels of targets by real‐time quantitative PCR after targeted lncRNA morpholino microinjection. The expression levels were normalized to that of the housekeeping gene ef1a. The standard for each gene was prepared by PCR amplification of cDNA fragments with specific primers (Table 1). The real‐time quantitative PCR assay was performed on the CFX96 Real‐time PCR Detection System (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and repeated twice. All values were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 3), and the data were analyzed by t‐test using Prism 6 on Macintosh OS X (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cells using RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germany). 2 × 106 cells were centrifuged and washed twice with PBS. RNA was isolated from these cells as per the manufacturer's instructions. 1.5 μg of total RNA was converted to cDNA using MMLV-RT (Thermo scientific, USA) and Oligo-dT primers (NEB, USA). miRNA conversion to cDNA was carried out using stem-loop reverse transcriptase (RT) primers without dithiothreitol (DTT) and the RNA denaturation step to maintain integrity of the stem-loop primer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen/Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was obtained from total RNA by reverse transcription using M‐MLV RT (Thermo #28025103) in 25 μl reactions. Subsequently, q‐RT‐PCR was performed on a Biorad q‐RT‐PCR machine (CFX96 Touch Real Time PCR detection system). GAPDH was used as endogenous control. The q‐RT‐PCR primers used in the study are listed in Appendix Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Telomere-related Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
500 ng cDNA was prepared from the isolated RNA by MMLV-RT (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Gene expression analysis of CTC1, OBFC1, TERT, and β-globin wascarried out by using qPCR master mix (Thermo Fisher, USA) on ABI StepOne detection system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). β-globin was used as an endogenous control. The sequence of primers for CTC1, OBFC1, and TERT genes is represented in Table 1. The thermal cycling conditions were 95 °C initial denaturation for 5 mins followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 45 secs, CTC1 (52 °C), OBFC1 (48 °C), TERT (58 °C), β-globin (58 °C) for 30 secs, 72 °C for 30 secs. Data acquisition was performed at the extension step. The expression of CTC1, OBFC1, and TERT relative to the endogenous control β-globin gene was analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Viral RNA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subconfluent monolayers of 17Cl-1 cells were infected at an MOI of 5 and collected by Trizol (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at the indicated times. RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions and transcribed into cDNA using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (MMLV RT) (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Viral gRNA, sgRNA, and cellular hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) RNA levels were measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) with the indicated primers (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) using an Applied Biosystems 7300 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The levels of gRNA and sgRNA were normalized to HPRT by the following threshold cycle (CT) equation: ΔCT = CT of gene of interest − CT of HPRT. All results are shown as a ratio to HPRT calculated as 2−ΔCT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Isolation, Purification, and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from 100 mg frozen tissue using 1 mL TRIzol ® reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was treated with DNase I (ThermoFisher Scientific) at 37 ° C for 25 – 30 min and then purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and stored at -80 ° C. RNA quantity and quality were determined by spectrophotometer readings (NanoDrop, ThermoFisher Scientific) and RNA integrity numbers (RINs) obtained from an Agilent 2100 bioanalyser [29 (link)]. Genomic DNA elimination was confirmed by PCR using primers specific for genomic DNA. First strand cDNA was synthesized from 2 μg RNA using 100 units M-MLV-RT (ThermoFisher Scientific) with 2.5 μM random decamers and 2.5 μM oligo dT primers (ThermoFisher Scientific), 0.5 mM of each dNTP and 20 units RNase inhibitor in RT Buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl 2 and 5 mM DTT) in a final volume of 20 μL. The reaction was incubated at 44 ° C for 1 h then inactivated at 92 ° C and the product aliquoted and stored at -20 ° C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent, treated with DNAse according to the manufacturer’s instructions and reverse transcription performed using random hexamers and MMLV RT (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific). The SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reactions were run in triplicate on a StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed by the StepOne Plus Software (Version 2.3, Applied Biosystems). Sequences of gene-specific primers were listed in Table 1. Gene expression was normalized based on HPRT mRNA content.

Sequences of gene-specific primers used for RT-PCR

PrimersForwardReverse
hHPRT5′-CCAGTCAACAGGGGACATAAA-3′5′-CACAATCAAGACATTCTTTCCAGT-3′
hIL12p405′-CTAAGCCATTCGCTCCTGCTG-3′5′-CTTGGCCTCGCATCTTAGAAAGG-3′
hIRF85′-TGGCTGATCGAGCAGATTGACAGT-3′5′-AAGGGATCCGGAACATGCTCTTCT-3′
hIDO15′-ACCAGCTCACAGGAACTTCCTG-3′5′-CCTGTGTGAAAGCTCTGGTCTC-3′
hTSP15′-CAATGCCACAGTTCCTGATG-3′5′-TGGAGACCAGCCATCGTC-3′
hVEGF-A5′-ATGCGGATCAAACCTCACCAA-3′5′-TGTCTTGCTCTATCTTTCTTTGG-3′
hAREG5′-CGGAGAATGCAAATATATAGAGCAC-3′5′-CACCGAAATATTCTTGCTGACA-3′
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Relative SERINC5 and SERINC3 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular RNA was extracted from 1 × 106 JTAg WT, JTAg S3/S5 KO, CEM WT, CEM S5KO (8), CEM S5KO (11), and CEM S3/S5 KO (9) cells using a Quick-RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research), followed by treatment with RNase-free DNAse I (Zymo Research). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was generated from 250 ng of all extracted RNA samples using M-MLV RT (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and treated with RNaseOUT (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNA was mixed with the respective primer pairs and SyGreen Blue Mix (PCR Biosystems) following the manufacturer’s protocol in biological triplicate and performed using a LightCycler 96 real-time PCR machine (Roche). Quantification cycle values were normalized to a reference gene (GAPDH) and relative SERINC5 or SERINC3 gene expression ratios were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008 (link)). The following primers were used for analysis: SERINC5: 5′-ATCGAGT TCTGACGCTCTGC-3′ and 5′-GCTCTTCAGTGTCCTCTCCAC-3’; SERINC3 5′-AATTCAGGAACACCAGCCTC-3′ and 5′- GGTTGGGATTGCAGGAAC GA-3’; GAPDH 5′-TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC-3′ and 5′-GGCATGGACT GTGGTCATGAG-3’.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative RT-PCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using Tri-Reagent (Ambion-Invitrogen) and reverse-transcribed using MMLV-RT (Thermo Fisher Scientific). qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR green (Sigma-Aldrich) on the ABI Prism 7900HT (Applied Bio-systems). Primers used in the study are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Relative gene expression was calculated using HPRT as a housekeeper gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!