The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Db 1701 capillary column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, Belgium

The DB-1701 capillary column is a gas chromatography column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. It features a polar polysiloxane stationary phase that provides efficient separation of various analytes. The column dimensions and specifications are tailored to deliver consistent and reliable performance for laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using db 1701 capillary column

1

Muscle Protein Fractional Synthesis Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The muscle myofibrillar fraction was isolated as previously described (Atherton et al., 2010; Greenhaff et al., 2008), and L‐[ring‐13C6]‐phenylalanine incorporation into myofibrillar protein was determined by gas chromatography combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC–C‐IRMS, Delta‐plus XP, Thermo, Hemel Hampstead, UK). Separation was achieved on a 25 m · 0.25 mm · 1.0 μ‐film DB 1701 capillary column (Agilent Technologies, West Lothian, United Kingdom). Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC‐MS, Agilent‐5977a, California, USA) was used to determine muscle intracellular L‐[ring‐13C6]‐phenylalanine enrichment. The sarcoplasmic fraction containing the intramuscular free amino acid pool was precipitated, and the supernatant was purified by cation‐exchange chromatography, using Dowex H+ resin and derivatised as their t‐BDMS derivatives before measurement of phenylalanine enrichment by GC‐MS (Atherton et al., 2010; Greenhaff et al., 2008; Mitchell et al., 2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Monosaccharide Composition Analysis by GC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monosaccharide composition analysis was determined by gas chromatograph (GC, Agilent 7890A, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) after acetylation. The polysaccharides (5 mg) were dissolved in 4 mL of 2 M trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and hydrolyzed at 110 °C for 2 h in a sealed glass tube. The solution was evaporated to dryness and then methanol (4 mL) was added to give a clear solution, which was evaporated again to dryness. This procedure was repeated three times. After hydrolysis, the neutral monosaccharides were successively reduced with NaBH4 (3 mL, 2 mol/L) and acetylated with acetic anhydride (4 mL) at 100 °C for 1 h [54 (link)]. The alditol acetates (1–2 mL) were then analyzed by GC equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a Agilent DB-1701 capillary column (30 m × 320 µm × 0.25 µm), the column temperature was maintained at 150 °C for 2 min, increased to 220 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min, held for 30 min. Nine standard monosaccharides were acetylated and analyzed by GC at the same conditions [55 ,56 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Simultaneous GC-MS Analysis of 12 Organic Contaminants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total of 12 OCPs were analyzed simultaneously by GC-MS using Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph, operating in EI mode. The final sample extract was injected onto a DB-1701 capillary column (30m×0.25mm×0.25μm, Agilent, USA) in the split mode (20:1) using helium as carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The temperature of the injector was 290°C. The oven temperature was programmed to warm up from 40°C (holding for 1min) to 130°C at a rate of 30°C /min, then to 250°C at a rate of 5°C / min, and then to 300°C (5min) at a rate of 10°C / min. Ionization energy was 70eV. The ion source temperature was 230°C and the quadruple rod temperature was 150°C. For each chemical, the target ions were monitored for quantification (Figure 1). The chromatogram of all the analytical contaminants was shown in Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Fecal Butyrate Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the first experiment in which we quantified butyrate levels butyric acid concentrations were determined from feces. For this purpose, feces were collected and then frozen at -80°C until measurement. Fecal samples were then lyophilized and rehydrated in distilled water. After pH was adjusted (between 2 and 3 with 5M HCl), 1 ml chloroform was added, and samples were centrifuged for 25 min at 4,000 × g. Afterward, the concentration of butyric acid was determined by gas chromatography using a GC2010 apparatus (Shimadzu, Japan). In this procedure, a DB-1701 capillary column with 30 m length, 0.25 mm inner diameter, and 0.25 mm film thickness (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used. The conditions for performing this procedure were as follows—oven: 250°C, split ratio: 20, colum: 95°C (Isothermal), FID: 300°C, make up gas helium: 4 ml/min, H2 flow: 40 ml/min, airflow: 400 ml/min, retention time butyric acid: 3.5–3.6 min. For quantification of SCFA, an external standard (SupelcoTM WSFA-1 Mix, Supelco Sigma Aldrich Co., Bellefonte PA, USA) was used. Results were reported as nanograms/dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fecal Butyric Acid Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For butyric acid concentrations, feces were collected and frozen at −80°C until measurement. Afterward, fecal samples were lyophilized and rehydrated in distilled water. pH was adjusted between 2–3 with 5M HCl, 1 ml Clorophorm was added, and samples were centrifuged (25 min at 4,000 g). The concentration of butyric acid was determined by gas chromatography with a GC2010 apparatus (Shimadzu, Japan) by using a DB-1701 capillary column with 30 m length, 0.25 mm inner diameter and 0.25 μm film thickness (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Conditions were: Oven: 250°C, split ratio: 20, Colum: 95°C (Isothermal), FID: 300°C, Make up gas Helium: 4 mL/min, H2 flow: 40 mL/min, Airflow: 400 mL/min, Retention time butyric acid: 3.5–3.6 min. An external standard (Supelco™ WSFA-1 Mix, Supelco Sigma-Aldrich Co., Bellefonte PA, USA) was used for quantification of SCFA. Results were reported as delta values (after supplementation − basal values).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Volatile Compound Identification in Process Waters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Volatile
compounds present in 4 g of process waters were first collected by
dynamic headspace purge-and-trap technique, after which they were
dispersed in 10 mL of deionized water and purged (37 °C) with
nitrogen (260 mL/min flow rate) for 30 min and trapped on Tenax tubes.
Water vapor was removed with nitrogen (5 mL N/min) for 20 min prior
to volatile desorption. Trapped volatiles were desorbed and separated
by GC (Agilent Technologies 6890 N, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a DB
1701 capillary column (30 m; i.d. 0.25 mm; 1 μm film thickness)
and an oven program as follows: initial temperature 45 °C for
5 min, after which it was increased gradually at 1.5 °C/min to
55 °C, 2 °C/min to 90 °C, and 8 °C/min to 230
°C and held for 8 min at 230 °C. The individual volatiles
were analyzed by MS (Agilent 5973 Network Mass Selective Detector)
70 eV ionization mode and a m/z scan
range between 30 and 250. Compound identification was aided by the
MS-library. Quantification was made by calibration curves of external
standards. The LOD was found to be at 5 ng/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Headspace SPME-GC-MS Volatile Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were equilibrated at 45 °C for 20 min in a water bath before headspace-SPME analysis. The SPME fiber was a DVD (Divinylbenzene) /Car/PDMS (Polydimethylsiloxa) fiber (50/30 µm thickness, Supelco, Bornem). Then, the volatile compounds were extracted at 50 °C for 30 min. GC–MS analyses were performed by using an Agilent 8890 GC coupled with an Agilent 5977B quadrupole mass selective detector (MSD, Agilent Technologies, Diegem, Belgium) with a Varian DB-1701 capillary column (30 m length × 0.25 mm i.d.; 0.25 µm film thickness). The working conditions of GC–MS were as follows: the transfer line to MSD (Mass Selective Detector) was maintained at 250 °C; the carrier gas (He) flow rate was 1.0 mL/min; the electron ionization (EI) was 70 eV; the scanned acquisition parameter ranged from 30 to 550 m/z; the initial oven temperature was 40 °C for 2 min; the temperature program was increased from 40 to 100 °C at 10 °C/min and held for 5 min and then raised to 220 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and held for 15 min, and the equilibrium time was 0.5 min. The injection port was in split mode, and the split ratio was 30:1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Volatile Compound Extraction and GC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were preheated in a water bath at 45 °C for 20 min. The volatile compounds with different experimental conditions were extracted at 50 °C for 30 min by HS-SPME with a DVD/Car/PDMS fiber (50/30 μm, Supelco, Bornem).
GC-MS analyses were performed using an Agilent 8890 GC coupled with an Agilent 5977B quadrupole mass selective detector (MSD, Agilent Technologies, Diegem, Belgium) with a Varian DB-1701 capillary column (30 m length × 0.25 mm i.d.; 0.25 μm film thickness). The working conditions of GC-MS were as follows: the transfer line to MSD was maintained at 250 °C; the carrier gas (He) flow rate was 1.0 mL min−1; the electron ionization (EI) was 70 eV; the scanned acquisition parameter was ranged from 30 to 550 m/z; the initial oven temperature was 40 °C, held 2 min; the temperature increased from 40 to 100 °C at a rate of 10 °C min−1 and held for 5 min, and then raised to 220 °C at a rate of 10 °C min−1 and held for 15 min; the equilibrium time was 0.5 min; the injection port was in split mode and the split ratio was 30 : 1. The volatile components were identified by comparison of the mass spectrum with mass spectral libraries (NIST 2017). The formation of pyrazines was calculated by the absolute peak area of each individual pyrazine in a semi-quantitative way.26 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!