The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fluorescence microscopy

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States

Fluorescence microscopy is an imaging technique that uses fluorescent probes to visualize and analyze biological samples. The core function of fluorescence microscopy is to provide high-contrast, high-resolution images of fluorescently labeled cellular structures, molecules, and processes. This technology allows researchers to study a wide range of biological phenomena, from protein interactions to gene expression patterns.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using fluorescence microscopy

1

Quantifying Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded into culture plates and cultured for 24 h to allow cell attachment. Then proliferating cells were determined using the Edu Cell Proliferation Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China), and the positive signals were captured under a fluorescence microscopy (Bio‐Rad, CA, USA). The percentage of proliferating cells was calculated through dividing the number of Edu+ cells by the number of Hoechst+ cells. Apoptotic cells were directly determined using the Annexin V/PI kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Live/Dead Bacterial Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PI and DAPI staining were used for the live/dead bacterial cell viability assay [54 (link)]. Fluorescence microscopy (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was then used to observe and record the live/dead fluorescence levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Cellular Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LX2 cells were incubated with 50 mM EDU medium diluent (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) in 96-well plates for 3 h. Following being fixed and permeabilized, 1 × Apollo® reaction cocktail (100 μL) was employed to react with the EdU for 30 min. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Finally, EdU positive cells were imaged by the fluorescence microscopy (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and analyzed by ImageJ software (Bethesda, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nile Red Staining for Lipid Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nile red staining was applied for evaluating lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells with different treatments. After incubating with PA and/or AEPL for 24 h, the medium was removed and cells were fixed with 10% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. HepG2 cells were stained with 2 μg/mL Nile red for 15 min. Images were acquired by fluorescence microscopy (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and the area was quantified by ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cytoprotective Effects of LSE on Cisplatin-Induced Toxicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NRK−52E cells were seeded in a 6−well dish (2x105 cells/dish) for 24 h. NRK−52E cells were treated with or without LSE (5 and 10 μg/mL) for 24 h in the presence or absence of cisplatin (8 μM). After 24 h, the medium was removed and 4% formalin was added to fix for 30 min. Next, DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was diluted with PBS and the nucleus was stained for 20 min at room temperature in the dark. Cell morphology was captured by fluorescence microscopy (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and quantified by ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Fusion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell–cell fusion assays were conducted as previously described [9 (link), 29 (link)]. Briefly, HEK293T cells transiently transfected with hACE2 and TMPRSS2 were used as target cells, and HEK293T cells transiently transfected with SARS-CoV-2 S protein and GFP were used as effector cells. 40 h after transfection, target cells were treated with vehicle, TAT or peptide (10 µM) 15 min before adding the effector cells. The effector cells were detached from their culture dishes with 0.25% trypsin and overlaid onto a target cell monolayer at an effector:target cells ratio of 1:3. After 2 h incubation, 10–21 images were randomly taken to count the number of fused vs. unfused cells using fluorescence microscopy (Bio-Rad). The cells number were counted using ImageJ (NIH). Effector cells incubated in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS without target cells were used as a negative control. All experiments were performed in triplicate. This assay was performed in a double-blind fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!