The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fe sem supra 35 vp electron microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss

The FE-SEM SUPRA 35 VP is a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis. It features a thermal field emission electron source and a variable pressure (VP) capability, allowing for the examination of samples in a controlled gas environment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using fe sem supra 35 vp electron microscope

1

Morphological Analysis of Electrospun Nanofibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of electrospun nanofibers before and after crosslinking was analysed by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), by using a Carl Zeiss FE-SEM SUPRA 35 VP electron microscope. The images were recorded with an acceleration voltage of 1 keV at approximately 4.5 mm working distance. Electrospun samples were fixed on a conductive carbon tape attached to a metal microscope holder and sputtered with a thin layer of palladium using a Benchtop Turbo sputtering device (Denton Vacuum, USA). The average diameter of cross-linked and non cross-linked nanofibers was measured directly from selected SEM images using ImageJ software and is given as an average value for each sample calculated from at least 20 measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Morphological Analysis of Lyophilized Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of lyophilized scaffolds was analyzed
by field emission
scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Prior to imaging, all samples
were pressed onto a double-sided carbon adhesive tape (SPI 116 Supplies).
No sputtering was performed on the sample surfaces (nonconductive).
A Carl Zeiss FE-SEM SUPRA 35 VP electron microscope was used. The
images were recorded with an acceleration voltage of 1 kV at room
temperature, which is sufficient to obtain SEM images with good resolution.
The sample pore sizes (PS) were measured by analyzing the SEM images
with the Image J1.47 software.36 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microstructure and Elemental Analysis of N-rGO, N-rGONRs, and N-pEAO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microstructure characterization of N-rGO and N-rGONRs and N-pEAO was performed by a scanning field emission electron microscope, Zeiss ULTRA plus SEM – Jena, Germany. Samples were adhered to the conductive carbon tape placed on an aluminum SEM holder. SEM images were taken at 2 kV using an SE2 detector at WD 5.5 mm. Further, elemental analysis of the samples was done inside SEM using EDS analysis with an Oxford X-Max SDD detector - High – Wycombe, UK, with working surface area of 50 mm2, processed with INCA software - Wycombe. EDS analysis was done at 20 kV.
For visualization of membranes’ microstructure, the field emission (FE)-SEM analysis was performed using a Carl Zeiss FE-SEM SUPRA 35 VP electron microscope. Imaging was performed at 1 kV accelerating voltage at an approximately 4.5 mm working distance. The membranes were attached to aluminum sample holders via conductive carbon adhesive tape. Prior to analysis, a layer of palladium was sputtered on the surface of membrane samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Lyophilized Scaffold Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of lyophilized scaffolds was analyzed by FESEM (Carl Zeiss FE-SEM SUPRA 35 VP electron microscope). Prior to imaging, all samples were pressed onto a double-sided carbon adhesive tape (SPI 116 Supplies, USA). No sputtering was performed on the sample surfaces. The freeze-dried scaffolds were immersed into liquid nitrogen and fractured to analyze the cross-section of the samples. The images were recorded with an acceleration voltage of 1 kV at room temperature. For the image analysis of the SEM images the software ImageJ/FIJI 1.53c (National Institute of Health, USA) (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)) was used by generating a binary image and subsequently using the inbuild particle measurements. Pores smaller than 10 pixel2 (approx. 63 μm2) were excluded from the calculation to avoid miscounts from single pixels and artifacts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!