The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Evo 50 ep scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The EVO-50-EP is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) manufactured by Zeiss. It is designed for high-resolution imaging of samples at the nanoscale level. The EVO-50-EP utilizes an electron beam to scan the surface of a sample, generating detailed images that reveal the topography and composition of the material being analyzed.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using evo 50 ep scanning electron microscope

1

Formaldehyde Fixation for SEM Imaging of Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM images, the yeast cell suspensions were mixed with 37% (v/v) formaldehyde reaching a final concentration of 3.7%, and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The yeast suspensions were then centrifuged for 5 min at 8000g, resuspended in 0.1 M potassium phosphate and kept at 4 °C until imaging. Prior to scanning electron microscopy, the cells were washed several times in 0.05 M Pipes buffer, pH 7.0, and dehydrated with 10 min stages in ascending ethanol series (30–100%). The samples were processed in a BAL-TEC Critical Point Dryer (CPD 030, Witten, Germany) and a thin conductive coating of gold/palladium was applied to the samples using a Polaron Sputter Coater (SC 7640, Kent, UK). The coated samples were mounted on brass stubs and examined and photographed with a Zeiss EVO-50-EP scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV in the secondary emission mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bacteriocin-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The indicator strain was grown to mid-log phase (OD600 of ~0.6) and incubated with vagococcin T (10× MIC) for 2 h at 37°C with gentle shaking. A culture with no bacteriocin added was used as a control. After incubation, cells were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g for 5 min), washed twice in PBS, and resuspended in fixing solution (1.25% [wt/vol] glutaraldehyde, 2% [wt/vol] formaldehyde, PBS) for incubation overnight at 4°C. Fixed cells were then washed three times in PBS and allowed to sediment/attach on poly-l-lysine-coated glass coverslips at 4°C for 1 h. Subsequently, attached cells were dehydrated with an increasing ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90, and 96% [vol/vol]) for 10 min each and finally washed four times in 100% ethanol. Cells were dried by critical-point drying using a CPD 030 critical-point dryer (Bal-Tec, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Coverslips were sputter coated with palladium-gold using a Polaron Range sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK). Microscopy was performed on an EVO50 EP scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at 20 kV with a probe current of 15 pA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Analysis of Amoeba-Gill Cell Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was conducted to study the association of N. perurans to the in vitro gill monolayer. RTgill-W1 cells were seeded onto Transwell® inserts and inoculated either with the in vitro cultured amoebae or just SW as negative control as described above. After 4 h, the top SW was removed from the well and the Transwell® inserts washed three times with sterile SW. The cells were fixed by adding 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4.
The fixed monolayers were transported to the Animal and Plant Health Agency, Wadebridge, UK for SEM following standard protocols. Briefly, membranes were washed thoroughly in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series (50–100%), 10 min in each solution. The samples were dehydrated in a BAL-TEC Critical Point-Dryer (CPD 030, Germany), and coated with a thin conductive layer of gold/palladium using a Polaron Sputter Coater (SC7640, UK). The coated samples were mounted on brass stubs, examined and photographed with a Zeiss EVO-50-EP scanning electron microscope in an accelerating voltage of 20 kV in the secondary emission mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Algae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Algae were treated using the same fixing method described above for TEM. After, coverslips coated with 1 mg mL−1 poly-l-lysine were placed to allow algae to settle for 20 min. The fixed algae culture for SEM examination were washed thoroughly in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (SCB) and dehydrated with 10 min steps in ascending ethanol series (50–100%) as in Wiik-Nielsen et al. (2016 (link)). The samples were processed in a BAL-TEC Critical Point Dryer CPD 030, (BAL-TEC AG Lichtenstein), and a thin conductive coating of gold–palladium was applied to the samples using a Polar on Sputter Coater SC7640 (Quorum Technologies, UK). The coated samples were mounted on aluminum stubs, examined and photographed with a Zeiss EVO-50-EP scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV in the secondary emission mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Materials Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical microscopy
(OM) was carried out using a Leica DM LM microscope. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were performed
using an EVO 50 EP scanning electron microscope (by Zeiss) and an
Inca Energy 200 EDS module (from Oxford Instruments). X-ray diffraction
(XRD) was performed by means of an Xpert MPD setup (by Philips, in
thin film mode and with Cu Kα =
1.5406 Å). Magnetic characterization was carried out using a
MicroMag 3900 (from Princeton Measurement Corp.) vibrating sample
magnetometer (VSM). XRF measurements were performed by means of an
X-RAY XAN apparatus (by Fischerscope). The instrument used to get
atomic force microscopy (AFM) topographical data was a Solver Pro
(by NT-MDT). A CM 10 setup was employed to acquire transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fixation and Preparation of Samples for TEM and SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures were diluted to approximately OD600 = 0.1 in BHI. When OD600 reached 0.4, the cultures were diluted at 1:250. Antibiotics and IPTG were added when appropriate. The cultures (10 mL) were grown to OD600 = 0.3 and 1 volume of fixation solution, containing 5% (wt/vol) glutaraldehyde and 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde in 1×PBS, pH 7.4, was added. The tubes were carefully inverted a few times and incubated for 1 h at room temperature before being placed at 4°C overnight. The following day, the cultures were centrifuged at 5000 × g, and the pellets were washed three times with PBS. Further preparations of samples to be analyzed with TEM were performed as described before (69 (link)).
Samples for SEM were, after washing with PBS, dehydrated with EtOH, essentially in the same manner as for sample preparations for TEM (69 (link)). The samples were subjected to critical point drying by exchanging the EtOH with CO2. The samples were then coated with a conductive layer of Au-Pd before being analyzed in a Zeiss EVO50 EP Scanning electron microscope. Images were analyzed and prepared using Fiji (71 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bacteriocin-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The indicator strain was grown to mid-log phase (OD600 of ~0.6) and incubated with vagococcin T (10× MIC) for 2 h at 37°C with gentle shaking. A culture with no bacteriocin added was used as a control. After incubation, cells were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g for 5 min), washed twice in PBS, and resuspended in fixing solution (1.25% [wt/vol] glutaraldehyde, 2% [wt/vol] formaldehyde, PBS) for incubation overnight at 4°C. Fixed cells were then washed three times in PBS and allowed to sediment/attach on poly-l-lysine-coated glass coverslips at 4°C for 1 h. Subsequently, attached cells were dehydrated with an increasing ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90, and 96% [vol/vol]) for 10 min each and finally washed four times in 100% ethanol. Cells were dried by critical-point drying using a CPD 030 critical-point dryer (Bal-Tec, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Coverslips were sputter coated with palladium-gold using a Polaron Range sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK). Microscopy was performed on an EVO50 EP scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at 20 kV with a probe current of 15 pA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!