The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using c100 thermal cycler

1

DNA Barcoding Using COI Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four randomly chosen DNA aliquots (1.4% of total tissue) were selected for COI amplification. In addition, 50 ng DNA from each of the 14 DNA aliquots was pooled to create a sample representing 20% of the total tissue. For each of these five samples, two PCR were run using one N5LCO and one N5HCO fusion primer, each uniquely tagged (S1 Fig). The same PCR master mix was used for all reactions to ensure identical PCR conditions for all replicates. The ten PCR replicates were then run simultaneously in a C100 Thermalcycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).
The COI fragment was amplified in a PCR reaction consisting of 1× PCR buffer (including 2.5 mM Mg2+), 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.025 U/μL of HotMaster Taq (5Prime, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), 50 ng DNA, and HPLC H2O to a total volume of 50 μL. The PCR program was as follows: 94°C for 180 s, 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 46°C for 30 s, and 65°C for 150 s, and 65°C for 5 min. PCR products were excised from a 1% TAE agarose gel and purified using the MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Concentrations were measured using the Qubit 2.0 BR Kit and the library for sequencing was prepared by pooling 12.3 ng of all ten amplicons. Then, paired-end sequencing was carried out by GATC Biotech (Constance, Germany) using the MiSeq with 300 bp paired-end sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Invertebrate mtDNA COX1 Gene Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 601-nt fragment of the 5′-end of the cox1 gene sequence from the mtDNA region was amplified by PCR using a generic invertebrate amplification forward primer, LCO1490 [S0867] (5′-GGT CAA CAA ATC ATA AAG ATA TTG G-3′) and a previously-designed reverse primer, Cff-R [S0368] (5′-GAA GGG TCA AAG AAT GAT GT-3′) [2 (link), 15 (link)]. Each reaction was conducted at a final volume of 30 µl, containing 15 µl MyTaq™ Red Mix (Bioline, Eveleigh, Australia) and approximately 2 µl of genomic DNA template. The PCR was conducted using C100 Thermal Cycler (BioRad, Gladesville, Australia) with cycling parameters set as following: denaturing at 95 °C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 10 s, followed by a final elongation for 5 min at 72 °C. All reactions were run with a negative control using sterile PCR-grade water [1 (link), 2 (link)]. Resulting amplicons were visualised on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel with GelRed™ Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA) in 1× TBE buffer to verify product size. Samples found to yield an unambiguous single band of expected size were sent for bidirectional sequencing (Macrogen Ltd, Seoul, Korea). Individual sequences were assembled and aligned against a reference sequence previously submitted to GenBank (KF684884) [2 (link)] using CLC Main Workbench 6.9.1 (CLC bio, Qiagen, Aarhus, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using RNAeasy kit (Qiagen, Cat. #74124). cDNA was synthesized using the SuperScript II kit (Invitrogen) and 1 μl added to Power SYBR Green PCR MasterMix (BioRad Cat. #172-5260). Primers (Suppl. Table 1) were added to a concentration of 400 nM. qRT-PCR was performed using the C100 Thermal Cycler (BioRad), and data were analyzed using BioRad CFX Manager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sanger Sequencing of UMOD Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The disease-causing variants of UMOD were verified using Sanger sequencing. Exon-flanking primers were used to sequence both strands of all affected and randomly selected unaffected patients. HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase (Qiagen) and a C100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used to generate polymerase chain reaction products that were sequenced by GENEWIZ. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1. Sequence chromatograms were analyzed using SnapGene Viewer 4.1.

Primer sequences for UMOD used in this study

FamilyForward primerReverse primer
FGCM, FGCO, FGGRTGCCCACCACATTGACACATTTCTGTCCACAGGATGGTGC
FGDC, FGJFACTCACAGTGCCATCCATCCAACCCTGAAGCTGGGCTTTT
FGJDAGCCTCTTGCCGGCTTTAATGAGTGTCACCTGGCGTACTG
FGITGGATGAGGACTGTGGGGAGAGGATGGATGGCACTGTGAGT
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Amplicon Sequencing with PCR Replication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR conditions were identical to those used in experiment I, and all ten replicates were run simultaneously in a C100 Thermalcycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) using the same master mix (see above). One to five PCR aliquots were pooled for each of the ten replicates with the aim to test whether replication of PCR reduces stochastic effects (was not evaluated, due to small number of replicates). Amplicons were purified and size selected (500–1000 bp) using magnetic beads (SPRIselect, Beckman Coulter, Bread, CA, USA; ratio 0.55×/0.45×). PCR product concentrations were measured using the Qubit BR Kit and the library for sequencing was prepared by pooling 52 ng of all ten replicates. 300 bp paired-end sequencing on a MiSeq was performed by GATC Biotech.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of xCT expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent following the manufacturer's recommended procedure (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The isolated RNA was then treated with RQ1 RNase-Free DNase according to the manufacturer's protocol to remove any traces of DNA (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Single stranded cDNA was created from total mRNA by reverse transcription using iScript Select cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The sequences of the specific primers were as follows: 5′-GTC TAA TGG GGT TGC CCT TGG-3′ (sense) on exon 5 and 5′-CGC ACT GAT GGT GGT AAA ATA GG-3′ (antisense) on exon 7 for mouse xCT (NM_011990.2). For a control mouse hypoxanthineguanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) (NM_013552) was used (Gomez et al., 2006 (link)). The primers were 5′-GAT CAG TCA ACG GGG GAC ATA-3′ (sense) on exon 4, 5′-GGG GCT GTA CTG CTT AAC CAG G-3′ on exon 6. The qPCR was carried out using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. The PCR cycling parameters were: denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, amplification and quantification program repeated 40 times (95°C for 5 sec, 56°C for 10 sec, 72°C for 30 sec), melting curve program (65-95°C with a heating rate of 0.5°C per second) with a continuous single fluorescent measurement, carried out in the C100 Thermal Cycler and analyzed using CFX96 Manager Software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative PCR Analysis of 16S rRNA Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative PCR was completed on neat extracted DNA against standards created through amplification of the 16S rRNA gene of five randomly selected samples (three LC- and two LC+), as previously described [36 (link)]. Subsequent qPCR reactions were completed in 25 μL reaction volumes, consisting of 1X SYBR Green Mastermix (Life Technologies), 400 nM of each of the forward and reverse primers, and 1 μL of neat DNA extract, with the reaction volume being made up with PCR grade water (Roche Diagnostics Limited, West Sussex, UK). Reactions were run using a C100 thermal cycler (BioRad, Hercules, USA) and CFX96 optical detector (BioRad), with data captured using CFX Manager software (BioRad), under conditions of 95°C for 10 minutes, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds, followed by a melt curve consisting of a temperature gradient of 60°C to 95°C in 0.5°C increments, each for 5 seconds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of YES1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from each cell line, RD, Rh28, Rh30, and Rh41, with Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (74104). RNA (1 μg) was used for cDNA synthesis with Roche Transcriptor First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (04379012001) using anchored oligo-dT. Normal human skeletal muscle RNA was purchased from Zyagen (San Diego, CA).
YES1 forward primer (ACAGCAAGACAAGGTGCAAA) and reverse primer (GTAAACCGACCATACAGTGCAG) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase forward primer (AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG) and reverse primer (TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA) were used with Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY) for quantitative polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) in a Bio-Rad C100 thermal cycler, and the result was analyzed with Bio-Rad CFX software. Annealing temperature was 55.7°C for both YES1 and GADPH primers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Illumina HiSeq2500 RNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Library preparation for sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencer
was carried out using the SMART-seq v4 Ultra low Input RNA kit (Clontech)
following the manufacturer’s instructions. All steps were carried out on
ice unless otherwise specified. Reverse transcription, PCR cycles and incubation
steps utilised a BioRad T100 Thermal Cycler. Amplification of cDNA by LC PCR
used a 10-cycle protocol. After bead purification, cDNA library concentration
was measured (High Sensitivity DNA kit, Agilent Technologies).
Sequencing libraries were generated using the Nextera XT DNA Library
Prep Kit (Illumina) using 150 pg cDNA as input following the
manufacturer’s instructions with the following modification. Following
library amplification and bead purification the final fragment size was analysed
and libraries quantified using the Universal KAPA Library Quantification kit
(Kapa Biosystems) and a Bio-Rad C100 thermal cycler. An equal amount of cDNA was
used to pool up to four samples, which were sequenced in one lane. Sequencing
was carried out to a depth of 50 million 100 bp paired-end reads per
library.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying gDNA Hotspot Mutations via ddPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from cultured UM cells using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total DNA collected was kept in 200 μl AVE buffer (RNase-free water supplemented with 0.04% sodium azide; Qiagen) and quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS assay kit on a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was used to assess gDNA through the presence of specific hotspot mutations in the respective cancer cell lines used. Samples were run in triplicates in a C100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) following a protocol reported previously [21 (link)]. PCR-grade water (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was added to each assay as no template control (NTC) and gBlocks (artificial DNA fragments) were used as positive control. Data were analyzed in Quanta Soft v 1.7.4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!