The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Uplc ms ms system

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The UPLC-MS/MS system is a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry instrument. It provides rapid and sensitive analysis of a wide range of analytes in complex matrices. The system combines the separation capabilities of ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) with the detection and identification capabilities of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS).

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using uplc ms ms system

1

UPLC-MS/MS Quantification of PFCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An UPLC-MS/MS system (Waters Corporation) was used for separation and detection of nine PFCs analyzed in this study. The separation units were equipped with an AcquityTM Binary Solvent Pump and a Sample Manager, coupled with an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm i.d., 3.5 μm) (Palo Alto, CA, USA). The mobile phase comprised two parts, A: 2 mmol L−1 ammonium acetate and B: methanol, with a flow rate of 0.2 mL min−1. The gradient elution was carried out as follows: 0–2 min, 30–75% B; 2–7.5 min, 75–95% B; 7.5–11 min, 95–100% B; 11–16 min, 100% B; 16–17 min, 100–30% B; 17–20 min, 30% B. The column temperature was kept at 30 °C and the injection volume was set at 10 μL. After each sample injection, the sampling needle was rinsed according to the UPLC needle-wash procedure, with acetonitrile (800 μL) and acetonitrile: water (2: 8, v/v) (500 μL) as strong and weak washing solvent, respectively.
A Xevo-TQD Triple Quadrupole Tandem Mass Spectrometry was used for PFC detection, and the analytes were negatively ionized by an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Chromatograms were recorded in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with a dwell time of 50 ms. The ESI-MS/MS parameters (Table 6) were optimized using 1 μg mL−1 of PFC solution in methanol. The instrument operation and data processing were performed with Masslynx V4.1 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UPLC–MS/MS Analysis of CHGX Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An UPLC–MS/MS system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, United States) equipped with a HESI-II probe was utilized to identify the main components of CHGX, as previously reported (Xu et al., 2018 (link)). The positive and negative HESI-II voltages were set to 3.8 and 3.2 kV, respectively, and the vaporizer temperature was set to 300°C. Both the sheath gas and the auxiliary gas were nitrogen. The collision gas was also nitrogen at a pressure of 1.5 mTorr. The mobile phase was composed of A (0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution) and B (acetonitrile). The HPLC elution conditions were optimized as follows: 0–1 min: 95% A; 1–2.4 min: 95–90% A; 2.4–13.5 min: 90–68% A; 13.5–18.5 min: 68–10% A; 18.5–19 min: 10–95% A; and 19–21 min: 95% A. The flow rate and the column temperature were set to 0.3 ml/min and 35°C, respectively. Data were collected and processed by Xcalibur 4.2 software (Waters Corp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UPLC/MS/MS Analysis of Compounds 1-3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Waters Acquity TQD ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)/MS/MS System (Milford, MA, USA) was used for UPLC/MS/MS analysis. The chromatographic experiments were conducted on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters) under gradient elution at 0.4 mL/min flow rate. The mobile phase was composed of formic acid-water (1: 1000, v/v) (A) and formic acid-acetonitrile (1: 1000, v/v) (B). The time program was as follows: 0–5 min, A–B (92:8, v/v) changed to A–B (62:38, v/v); 5–7 min, A-B (62:38, v/v); 7-7.1 min, A-B (62:38, v/v) changed to A–B (92: 8, v/v); 7.1–9 min, (92: 8, v/v). The injection volume was 5 μL into the UPLC/MS/MS system with a negative electrospray ionization (ESI) ion source. The total ion chromatograms (TIC) for 13 were carried out using the multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The mass parameters were optimized to obtain the clearest, high intensity signals. The best choice of parameters were described as 3000 V capillary voltage, 20 V cone voltage, 125 °C source temperature, 400 °C desolvation temperature, 50 L/h cone gas flow, 900 L/h desolvation gas flow, and 38 eV collision energy. Data was processed by the MassLynx 4.1 (Milford, MA, USA) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measurement of Serum 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 levels in the serum were measured using a modified LC‐MS/MS method. Briefly, 100 μl aliquots of calibrators or serum samples were spiked with 500 μl isotope‐labeled internal standard solution. Samples were vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 9,250 g and 4°C. After centrifugation, 400 μl of sample supernatant was transferred into a 96‐deep well plate and then dried under nitrogen at 60°C. Using 100 μl acetonitrile solution of PTAD, we performed derivatization for 60 min and then added 50 μl methanol for reconstitution. Subsequently, the residuals were injected into the UPLC‐MS/MS system (Waterscorporation). Chromatographic separation on the Waters ACQUITY UPLC I‐class was performed under binary gradient conditions with a mobile phase A of water with 0.1% formic acid (volume fraction) and 5 mM ammonium formate and mobile phase B of methanol with 0.1% formic acid. The column temperature was maintained at 40°C. Xevo TQD was used for MS/MS detection in positive electrospray ionization mode and multiple reaction monitor (MRM) mode. The accuracy of this method was validated by analyzing the National Institute of Standards and Technology SRM 972a. Comparing the measurement results with the reference values of SRM 972a, the accuracy of this method was 90%–115% and 95%–110% for 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of DEHP and MEHP in Serum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DEHP/MEHP concentrations were measured in serum samples form the Bio-Bank of the Medical Research Department, E-DA Hospital. Before analysis, serum samples were thawed at 4°C for 24 h (Supplementary Table 2). Serum (100 μL) was added to 200 μL of MeOH containing 75 ng/mL of DEHP-d4 and 13C4-MEHP, placed in a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube, and vortexed vigorously for 5 min to precipitate proteins. The mixture was then centrifuged at 15,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min, and the supernatant was transferred to a 500 μL sample vial for DEHP and MEHP analysis.
We used a Waters UPLC-MS/MS system to separate and detect DEHP and MEHP. An ACQUITY UPLC Isolator (2.1 × 50 mm) was applied for elimination of background phthalates, and an ACQUITY UPLC® BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 µm) was used for separation. Five μL of prepared sample were injected for analysis at a flow-rate of 0.5 mL/min. The mobile phases were MeOH (mobile phase A) and 5 mM of NH4Ac in Milli-Q water (mobile phase B). The initial condition (0 min) was 20% mobile phase A and 80% mobile phase B, with a gradient from 0.5–2.5 min bringing mobile phase A to 90% and mobile phase B to 10%. The column and sample tray temperatures were 45°C and 4°C, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Burn Injury Lipid Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole blood was collected 24 h postburn injury, maintained at room temperature for 30 min, and centrifuged at 4 °C to gain blood serum. Immediately after serum collection, an antioxidant solution (0.2% triphenylphosphine/0.2% butylated hydroxytoluene/0.1% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid per 100 µL of serum) was added at 2% of volume and frozen at −80 °C until analysis. For analysis of lipid profiles, nine isotope-labeled oxylipins were added to the samples as internal controls at 3× volume in methanol and extracted using solid phase extraction followed by the liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization/multistage mass spectrometry UPLC/MS/MS system (Waters Acquity UPLC) and the AB Sciex 6500+ QTrap system as previously described (12 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of VCR Levels by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The plasma concentration of F-VCR and T-VCR and the urine VCR concentration was determined using the ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, United States) with vinblastine sulfate used as the internal standard (IS) as previously described by our team (Yang et al., 2013 (link), 2015 (link)). The compounds were detected as doubly charged ions and the multiple reaction monitor (MRM) transitions of VCR and the IS were m/z 413.2 → 353.2 and m/z 406.2 → 271.6, respectively. F-VCR was separated from liposomal form in plasma using SPE method; plasma T-VCR and urine VCR were extracted using liquid-liquid extraction method. F-VCR and T-VCR were identified and quantified over a theoretical concentration range of 0.2–50 ng/ml for F-VCR in plasma, 0.5–400 ng/ml for T-VCR in plasma and 0.5–100 ng/ml for VCR in urine, respectively. Assay specificity was assessed using blank sample from six different lots to verify the absence of interference at retention time. Quantitation was made using peak area ratios of analyte/IS, and back-calculated concentrations were determined using a weighted (1/ × 2) linear regression (y = ax + b).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Tryptophan Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kyn and Trp were separated by ultra-performance liquid chromatography and measured by tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The selected plasma samples were shipped at or below -70 °C to the Amsterdam University Medical Centers for analysis. Upon analyses, samples were thawed rapidly at room temperature and a mixture of stable isotope-labeled internal standards was added to 50 μl of plasma. The samples were deproteinized using acetonitrile, dried under nitrogen, and reconstituted in 100 μl of 0.1% heptafluorobutyric acid. Aliquots (10 μl) of the extracts were injected into the UPLC–MS/MS system comprising of Acquity Xevo TQ-XS system operated in positive ESI mode using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for preselected analytes and an overall run time was 6 min. The MRM transition which gave the most intense signal was chosen for quantification. IDO activity was calculated as the ratio of measured kynurenine concentration to measured tryptophan concentration (K/T ratio). In order to capture all metabolites in the Trp and Kyn pathways, we measured other metabolites including anthranilic acid, 3OH-kynurenine, 3OH-anthranilic acid, quinolinic acid, kynurenic acid and xanthurenic acid (Supplementary Fig. 1). We also calculated the ratio of the sum of all determined kynurenine metabolites to Trp concentration (Sum/T ratio).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of MGO and 3-DG via UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MGO and 3-DG were determined, which were derivatized with OPD. To perform derivatization, 200 µL of the extract was mixed with 100 µL of 0.1 mM 2,3-hexanedione internal standard and 200 µL of 5 mM OPD. Derivation was performed at 4 °C for 12 h. The quinoxaline derivatives of 3-DG and MGO were determined by using the Waters UPLC-MS/MS system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The separation was conducted on a C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 3.5 μm; Waters X-Bridge) with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min at 35 °C and with 5 µL of the samples. The mobile phase was (A) acetonitrile and (B) 1% formic acid. The gradient elution condition was as follows: A: 10%, 0–0.1 min; 20%,1 min; 70%, 6 min; 100%, 6.3–7.5 min; and 10%, 8–10 min. Positive ESI ionization and MRM scan modes were used. The parent ion and daughter ion were as follows: m/z 145 → 77 for MGO (cone, 35 v; collision, 25 v), m/z 235 → 199 for 3-DG (cone, 30 v; collision, 12 v), and m/z 187 → 77 for 2,3-hexanedione (cone, 32 v; collision, 35 v).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

UPLC-MS/MS Protocol for Compound Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Waters UPLC MS/MS system equipped with acuity Ultra performance LC, Quaterny Pump, 1290 infinity sampler and Kinetex C18 column (50 mm X 4.6 mm) with particle size 2.6 µm and porosity 100 A°. TSQ triple quadrupole 6420-mass spectrometer. Mass lynx V 4.1 software was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!