The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using sureprint g3 human cgh microarray kit 8 60k

1

Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
aCGH was performed using the SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray Kit (8×60K) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA USA), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Labeling and hybridization of patient and reference DNA (#5190-3796, Human Reference DNA, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA USA) were performed using enzymatic labeling and hybridization protocols (v. 7.5 Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA USA). Array images were acquired with an Agilent SureScan Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA USA). Data analysis was performed using Cytogenomics Software (v. 3.0.6.6) (Agilent Technologies), the publicly available Database of Genomic Variants (DGV), and the Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans employing Ensembl Resources (DECIPHER). Annotations of the genes located within the region of genomic imbalance were retrieved from the NCBI Gene Database, OMIM, and the literature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Array CGH Analysis of Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Array CGH was performed using the SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray Kit 8 × 60 k (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Labeling and hybridization were performed using the SureTag DNA Labeling kit and Oligo aCGH/ChiP‑on‑chip Hybridization kit (Agilent Technologies Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Protocol v8.0). Genomic DNA derived from each cell line without acid or DCA was compared to a Human Male Reference DNA (Agilent). Genomic DNA of each cell line without acid or DCA was labeled with Cy5-dUTP and compared to a reference DNA, which was labeled with Cy3-dUTP (i.e., naïve CP-A vs reference). Genomic DNA of each cell line treated with acid and DCA was labeled with Cy5-dUTP and compared to that of corresponding cell line treated without acid or DCA, which was labeled with Cy3-dUTP (i.e., CP-A treated with acid and DCA vs naïve CP-A). After washing the array slides, they were scanned using an Agilent Technologies Microarray scanner, and the resulting data were analyzed using the Agilent Cytogenomics software program v.5.1. (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genomic Profiling via Trio Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using the QIAamp Blood Midi Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). We performed trio sequencing using a TruSight One sequencing panel consisting of 4813 genes associated with known Mendelian genetic disorders on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina). Sequence data were analyzed using CLC Genomics Workbench version 8.0 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Variants detected by MiSeq were validated by conventional Sanger sequencing. Microarray comparative genomic hybridization was performed with the SurePrint G3 Human CGH Micro-array kit 8 × 60 K, Reference DNA Female, and the SureScan Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). Results were analyzed by CytoGenomics Software version 4.0 (Agilent).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Detecting Chromosomal Aberrations in FFPE Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections, sample preparation, slide hybridization and analysis were performed using a SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray kit 8×60K (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) following the manufacturers instructions. The arrays were scanned at 2-µm resolution using an Agilent microarray scanner and analyzed using Feature Extraction v10.10 and Agilent Genomic Workbench v.6.0software (Agilent Technologies). The aberration detection method-2 (ADM-2) algorithm was used to compute and assist in the identification of aberrations for a given sample. Significant chromosomal aberrations were determined using the algorithm ADM-2 (threshold, 5; absolute minimum average log2 ratio, 0.50; with at least three or more consecutive probe sets).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray Kit 8 × 60 K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The slides were scanned using the SureScan Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and analyzed with Feature Extraction Software v11.5 (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) under designed parameters of the human reference genome hg19. The data analysis was conducted via the Agilent Cytogenomics software available on the website of the company (https://www.genomics.agilent.com/en/CGH-Microarray-Data-Analysis/CytoGenomics-Software/?cid=AG-PT-111&tabId=AG-PR-1017, Agilent Cytogenomics v2.7.8.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!