The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

30 protocols using wizard genomic dna purification

1

Bacterial Strain Identification via 16S rDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolate showing the largest clearing zone on starch-agar plate was identified by 16SrDNA sequencing. Chromosomal DNA was isolated using Wizard Genomic DNA Purification (Promega). The 16S rDNA gene was amplified by PCR using universal primers UniB1 and BactF1 (Supplementary Table 1). The resulted 1.4 kb fragment was sequenced using the dideoxy-chain termination method (Macrogen, South Korea). The bacterial isolate was identified by aligning the 16s rDNA sequences with other known bacteria using NCBI BLASTn (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). 16S rDNA gene sequence was submitted to GenBank.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Variants in PPARα Gene Analysis from Umbilical Cord Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Umbilical cord blood was collected immediately after delivery and transferred to vacuum blood vessels coated with EDTA. The blood samples were then centrifuged and instantly saved at −80°C until analysis. According to the standard scheme, total DNA was extracted from umbilical cord leukocytes using Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, United States). According to the manufacturer’s protocol, DNA samples were genotyped using the Illumina Infinium Asian Screening Array v1.0 BeadChip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States). The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PPARα (chr22:46546429-46639652, GRCh37/hg19 by Entrez Gene) were filtered out according to the criteria as follows: 1) genotype call rate <95%; 2) Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE)-P < 1 × 10−6; 3) minor allele count < 1Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE)-P < 1 × 10−6. Then imputation was performed on Michigan Imputation Server (Das et al., 2016 (link)). The reference panel was the 1,000 Genomes Project phase 3. After imputation, SNP that did not meet the following requirements was excluded: 1) minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.05; 2) imputation quality score R2 > 0.3. Finally, 61 SNPs in the PPARα gene were viable for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the isolates using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification (Promega, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was carried out at the University of Minnesota Mid-Central Research and Outreach Center (Willmar, Minnesota) using a single 2 × 250-bp dual-index run on an Illumina MiSeq with Nextera XT libraries to generate ∼30- to 50-fold coverage per genome. Genome assembly of MiSeq reads for each sample was performed using SPAdes assembler with the careful assembly option and automated k-mer detection (Bankevich et al., 2012 (link)). The identification of genus and species of the isolates was carried out using fastANI (Jain et al., 2018 (link)) with a percentage >80% of identification. Acquired AMR genes, plasmid types were identified using ABRicate tool (version 0.8.13), Resfinder was the database used for the identification of resistance genes (Zankari et al., 2012 (link)); PlasmidFinder database for plasmid replicon identification (Carattoli et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction of Nucleic Acids from Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After exposure to the aforementioned stimuli, cultured cells were washed on ice with ice-cold phosphate-buffer saline (PBS) with deferoxamin (PBS-DFO, 200 µM), detached using cell scrapers and collected by centrifugation (400 ×G, 4°C). Nucleic acids were subsequently extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification (Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands) kit according to instructions, with all buffers supplemented with DFO (200 µM), dissolved in 80 µL PBS-DFO with RNAse A (200 units, NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA), incubated for 10 minutes at 37°C. After proteinase K addition (200 units) and incubation for 30 minutes at 56°C, DNA was purified using the QIAQuick blood and tissue kit (all buffers supplemented with DFO), eluted in 100 µL of a 10 mM Tris, 1mM EDTA solution (pH 8) and stored at -80°C until further processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transposon Insertion Sequence Recovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Because the transposition element contains a temperature-sensitive origin of replication in addition to the beta lactamase gene between the inverted repeats, recovery of DNA regions flanking the insertion is relatively straightforward.

Isolate total genomic DNA (plasmid and chromosomal DNA). (Most commercial genomic DNA preparation kits, e.g., Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification, Promega work well with ETEC strains.)

Digest an aliquot of genomic DNA with a restriction endonuclease that does not cut between the inverted repeats of the transposon (for instance, MluI).

Ligate the DNA with T4 DNA ligase.

Transform ligation mixture into commercially available ampicillin-sensitive E. coli cloning strain (e.g., DH10BT1, DH5α, Top10), selecting on Luria agar containing ampicillin, 100 μg/ml, at 30 °C.

Grow isolated ampicillin-resistant colonies in Luria broth overnight at 30 °C.

Isolate plasmid DNA using commercially available plasmid preparation kit that yields DNA of sufficient quality for sequencing.

Set up separate sequencing reactions with the primers TnphoA.179 (5′-CC ATCCCATCGCCAATCA-3′) and TnphoA.ts1 (5′-CGAAATTAATACGACTCA-3′).

Resulting DNA sequence information can then be used in BLASTN or BLASTX program searches of NCBI databases (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) to identify potential homologues.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MCMV DNA Quantification in Organs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from organs or blood (Wizard Genomic DNA Purification, Promega). MCMV coordinates 111218–111461 were amplified (LightCycler 480 SYBR green, Roche Diagnostics) and converted to genome copies by comparison with plasmid DNA amplified in parallel. Cellular DNA was quantified in the same samples by amplification of a β-actin gene segment. Viral DNA loads were normalized by cellular DNA loads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic Analysis of E. coli Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We extracted purified DNA from the isolates using Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification (Promega) kits and QIAGEN© DNEasy Blood & Tissue Kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Whole-genome sequencing of E. coli isolates was carried out at the University of Minnesota using Illumina MiSeq with Nextera XT libraries. Raw reads were quality-trimmed and adapter-trimmed using trimmomatic40 (link) and assembled using SPAdes (Bankevich et al. 2012). Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were detected using ABRicate (version 0.813) and a curated version of the ResFinder database (Zankari et al. 2012). We also performed in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST) based on seven housekeeping genes (adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA, and recA), an additional eight housekeeping genes (dinB, icdA, pabB, polB, putP, trpA, trpB, and uidA), and core genome (cgMLST) using MLST 2.041 (link) and cgMLSTFinder 1.142 (link). Detailed methods are previously described43 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transgenic Chicken Generation Using Lentiviral Vectors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transgenic chickens were prepared using surrogate shell methods [29 (link)]; all of the White Leghorn donor eggs used in the experiments were from newly fertilized eggs obtained from the North Agricultural Technology company. The subgerminal cavity beneath the blastoderm at stage X was microinjected with 1–2 μl of viral suspension and then placed in the first recipient eggshells and incubated at 37°C at 50%-60% humidity for three days. The embryos were then transferred to a second series of surrogate shells and incubated under the same conditions until hatched.
To identify the transgene in chickens, DNA was extracted from heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney and muscle of the chicken embryos using a genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Wizard Genomic DNA Purification) and PCR was performed. To determine the efficiency of lentiviral infection, 15 three-month-old G0 hens were randomly slaughtered, and the transgene was identified in the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidneys and ovaries of these animals.
The amount of DNA used for PCR amplification in G0 chimeric chickens was 1 μg. Because the primers used for screening the transgenic chickens did not include the His-tag sequences, the transgenic chickens with the HNP4 gene or HNP4-His gene could be detected by the same primers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genotyping Wheat Lines Using Illumina SNP Chip

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples were extracted from young leaves (2- to 3-wk-old) taken from each line, using Wizard Genomic DNA purification (Promega) following the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA samples were genotyped using an Illumina 9K SNP chip with 8632 SNPs (Cavanagh et al. 2013 ). For a given marker, the genotype for the ith line was coded as the number of copies of a designated marker-specific allele carried by the ith line (absences equal to zero, and presents equal to one). SNP markers with unexpected genotype AB (heterozygous) were recoded as either AA or BB, based on the graphical interface visualization tool of GenomeStudio (Illumina) software. SNP markers that did not show clear clustering patterns were excluded. In addition, 66 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were screened. After filtering the markers for 0.05 minor allele frequency (MAF), and deleting markers with more than 10% of no calls, the final set of SNPs was 1635 SNPs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation and Analysis of Telomeric DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa genomic DNA was isolated with the Wizard Genomic DNA purification according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). 6 μg of genomic DNA was digested with 30U of HinfI and RsaI overnight at 37°C. The digested DNA was mixed with 6xMassRuler DNA Loading Dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific), loaded on a 0.8% agarose gel in 1xTBE and fractionated by gel electrophoresis at 2V/cm for 20 hours. The gels were dried for two hours at 50°C in vacuum, treated with denaturation buffer (0.5 M NaOH, 1.5 M NaCl) and neutralization buffer (0.5 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1.5 M NaCl), followed by pre-hybridization with Church buffer for 1 hour at 50°C. The gels were hybridized overnight at 50°C with a randomly labeled TeloC probe as described previously23 . The gels were washed for 1 hour at 50°C with 4xSSC, 4xSSC 0.1%SDS, and 2xSSC 0.1%SDS, exposed to a phosphorimager screen and analyzed on a Typhoon phosphorimager (GE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!