The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

55 protocols using uplc ms ms

1

UPLC-MS/MS Quantification of TMAO and TMA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The quantifications of TMAO and TMA were performed by UPLC-MS/MS (WATERS Inc., Milford, MA, USA). The chromatographic separation was carried out on an Infinity II HILIC column. The flow rate was maintained at 0.2 mL/min, and the column was heated to 30 • C. The instrument parameters for WATERS UPLC-MS/MS analysis are as follows: nitrogen drying gas temperature 300 • C, nitrogen sheath gas temperature 250 • C, nitrogen drying gas flow 5 L min -1 , nitrogen sheath gas flow 11 L min -1 , capillary voltage 3500 V, nebulizer pressure 45 psi and nozzle voltage 500 V. The information regarding untested compounds and internal standards was detected by characteristic precursor-product ion transitions.
The detection was carried out by using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in the positive ion mode in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes. The sample concentrations were determined from calibration curves using a peak area ratio of the analyte to its isotope [39] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Stimuli-Responsive Drug Release Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro release profiles were studied using PBS solution (pH 7.4) supplemented with 30% ethanol as the releasing medium, which could meet the sink condition, namely possessing enough capacity to dissolve the hydrophobic PTX released from F8-SS-PTX or C8-SS-PTX 16 (link), 17 (link). In brief, 0.2 mL of prodrug nanoassemblies (200 nmol) were poured into 30 mL of the releasing medium containing different concentrations of dithiothreitol (DTT, a prevailing GSH simulant) or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, a prevailing ROS simulant) and shocked at 37 °C. 0.2 mL of the releasing medium was withdrawn at the designated time. Then, the content of PTX or prodrug (F8-SS-PTX or C8-SS-PTX) was measured using HPLC (n = 3 for each group). To clarify the result of drug release, the formulation was incubated with release medium containing DTT or H2O2 for 30 min with gentle shaking, and the generated intermediates were certified using UPLC-MS/MS (Waters Co., Ltd., Milford, MA, USA) and LCMS-8060 (Shimadzu Co., Japan), respectively. In addition, the changes of these nanoassemblies in the presence of DTT and H2O2 were monitored by TEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bile Acid Profiling in Serum and Feces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
50 μL of serum was mixed with 150 μL of methanol. The mixture was vortexed for 2 min and centrifuged at 20,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. 160 μL of supernatant was vacuum-dried. The residue was redissolved with acetonitrile and water to a volume of 40 μL. Supernatant was used for UPLC-MS/MS analysis. 200 μL aliquot of methanol/water (1:1) was added to 10 mg of fecal samples. Samples were homogenized and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred into a tube and sample residue was extracted by methanol/acetonitrile (2:8). The extraction mixture was vortexed and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was then used for further analysis.
Bile acid analysis was performed on the UPLC-MS/MS (Waters Corp., USA). The elution solvents were water + 0.01% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile/methanol (19:1) + 0.01% formic acid (B). The elution gradient at a flow rate of 450 μL/min was as follows: 0–2 min (20% B), 2–3 min (20–25% B), 3–6 min (25% B), 6–8 min (25–35% B), 8–11.5 min (35% B), 11.5–18 min (35–99% B), 18–19 min (99% B), and 19–20 min (99–20% B). The peak annotation and quantitation was performed by TargetLynx application manager. Multi Quant 2.1 software were used for bile acids data collection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Plasma TMAO by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification of TMAO in plasma samples was performed as described previously61 (link). Briefly, for the sample extraction, 25 µL of plasma was mixed with 80 µL of methanol with labelled IS working solution (TMAO-d9; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Massachusetts, USA) and mixed 30 seconds to precipitate proteins. The samples were subjected to centrifugation at 9000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature, and the supernatants were diluted with 150 uL of MilliQ water. Diluted samples were filtered with PVDF filters 0.22 µm and transferred into HPLC vials for analysis. The analysis was performed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) using a column Acquity UPLC BEH HILIC (1,7 µm 2,1 × 100 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolite Extraction and Analysis of Microalgae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microalgal cells were centrifuged at 5000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. Then, pre-chilled methanol solution (80%, v/v, methanol in water) was added into the pellet for 3 min to quench microalgal metabolism. Afterward, cells were collected after centrifugation at 5000× g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the pellets were resuspended in pre-chilled methanol solution (80%) and frozen with liquid nitrogen. After 20 min incubation at −20 °C, the supernatant was collected after centrifugation for 5 min at 4 °C. The resuspension was then repeated twice. The merged supernatants were vacuum dried, and the residuals were dissolved in 80% methanol and analyzed using UPLC-MS/MS (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The tandem system was equipped with an HSS T3 column (C18, 2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 μm particle size) with a flow rate set as 0.4 mL/min, and the linear gradient procedure was set as follows: (a) 100% solvent B (H2O/HCOOH/0.2 M NH4Ac in water, 94.9:0.1:5, v/v/v) to 60% solvent A (C2H3N/HCOOH/0.2 M NH4Ac in water, 94.9:0.1:5, v/v/v); (b) 100% solvent A, held for 1 min; and (c) 100% solvent B and held for 4 min. The system was operated in the positive and negative ESI modes, and quantification was performed using the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The optimal operating conditions were set according to our previous study [4 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pharmacokinetics of Prodrug Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4T1 xenograft tumor-bearing BALB/c mice were used to investigate the pharmacokinetic profiles of prodrug nanoparticles. The mice were randomly divided into three groups and were intravenously administrated Taxol, PMAL NPs and PSSMAL NPs at an equivalent PTX dose of 4 mg/kg. At the designed time intervals, about 300 μL blood were collected, centrifuged and stored at −80 °C until analysis. The plasma concentration of free PTX was analyzed by UPLC–MS/MS (Waters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Plasma Bazedoxifene Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was collected into EDTA K2 tubes and allowed to stand for 30 min. Each blood sample was then centrifuged for 10 min at 1,910 ×g at 4°C, and two aliquots of 1.5 mL plasma were transferred into Eppendorf tubes, frozen, and stored at –70°C until quantification.
Plasma bazedoxifene concentrations were determined using validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). An aliquot of the upper organic layer was injected into the UPLC-MS/MS system (MS/MS system, Water XevoTM TQ-S MS, Waters Corp., Manchester, UK). The column used was the Waters ACQUITY UPLC®BEH C18, 1.7 µm (2.1 mm [ID] × 50 mm [L]), and the mobile phase consisted of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in distilled water, Acetonitrile mixture maintained at 0.4 mL/min. The targets were detected using a multiple reaction monitoring method with positive electrospray ionization, and the MS transitions were 471.15 to 126.00.
The calibration curve for bazedoxifene was linear over the range of 0.05–25 ng/mL (r2 > 0.99) with intraday accuracy: 96.9–111.8%; precision: 3.0–4.5%; interday accuracy: 102.2–112.7%; and precision: 5.7–8.2% [9 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis of Fecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The metabolomic analysis was performed using untargeted ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC/MS/MS, Waters ACQUITY, Milford, MA, United States), as described previously (Vizioli et al., 2021 (link)). Briefly, the fecal samples were prepared using the automated MicroLab STAR system (Hamilton Company, Franklin, MA, United States) and extracted at a constant per-mass basis. Proteins were removed using methanol precipitation (Glen Mills GenoGrinder 2000), followed by centrifugation. The samples were processed using four methods: reverse phase (RP)-UPLC/MS/MS with electrospray ionization (ESI), in both positive (optimized for hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds, respectively) and negative modes, and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC)-UPLC/MS/MS-ESI in negative ion mode. The raw UPLC/MS/MS data were integrated into ion peaks organized by mass, retention time/index, and peak area. Metabolites were annotated by comparison of individual spectra to a standard reference library, and area-under-the-curve analysis was performed for peak quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Evaluation of Physical and Hormonal Status in HSCT Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height measurement (without shoes) by stadiometer was performed routinely at every outpatient assessment. Weight was measured and body mass index (kg/m2) was calculated. Thyroid hormone function testing, including thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroxine (T4), and free T4 levels, was performed prior to bone marrow transplantation. Thyroid hormone testing was also assessed one year following HSCT in a subset of patients (n =77). In 64 patients, 25-OH vitamin D levels were assayed. Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D were determined using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) (Waters, Milford, MA)6 (link). Bone density was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 18 patients and Z-scores were corrected for height-age using an online calculator for the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study (BMSCS):http://www.bmdcspublic.com/zscore.httm.
Pubertal hormones were assessed in 8 of the 37 patients over age 12 years and complete pubertal assessments were unavailable. As such, these results were not formally analyzed for this publication.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Measuring Posaconazole Plasma Concentrations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The blood samples for measuring PCZ Cmin were collected for routine care. Only children having achieved steady-state were included in the analysis and PCZ was considered to have achieved a steady-state plasma concentration after at least 7 days of dosing (Lai et al., 2020 (link)). Dose adjustments were taken according to the current guidelines and the manufacturer’s recommendations (Vicenzi et al., 2018 (link)). PCZ trough plasma concentrations were determined using a previously described ultra-high-performance liquid chromatograph-tandem mass spectrometry method (UPLC-MS/MS, Waters, United States) (Jia et al., 2020 (link)). The analytical range was 0.025–5.00 μg mL−1. For the purpose of this study, plasma concentrations ≥0.7 μg mL−1 were considered therapeutic for prophylaxis and ≥1.0 μg mL−1 for treatment (Bernardo et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!