The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Isomet low speed saw cutting machine

Manufactured by Buehler
Sourced in United States

The ISOMET low speed saw cutting machine is a versatile laboratory equipment used for precision sectioning of a variety of materials. The core function of this machine is to provide controlled, low-speed cutting of samples to prepare them for further analysis or processing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using isomet low speed saw cutting machine

1

Enamel Specimen Preparation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enamel blocks (4x4x3 mm) were obtained from unerupted human third molars recently extracted and kept in 0.1% thymol solution at pH 7.0. The blocks were cut using a ISOMET low speed saw cutting machine (Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL, USA) with two diamond disks (Extec Corp., Enfield, CT, USA), which were separated by a 4 mm thickness spacer. The surfaces of the blocks were ground flat with water-cooled silicon carbide discs (320, 600, and 1200 grade papers; Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) and polished with felt paper wet by diamond spray (1 µm polishing particle size; Buehler, Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL, USA). Blocks were cleaned using an ultrasonic device for 10 minutes and checked regarding the presence of white spots and cracks using a microscope (x40).
The surface hardness (SH) was determined using the average values of five indentations performed at distances of 100 µm from each other (Knoop diamond, 25 g, 10 s, Hardness tester from Buehler, US). Seventy-two enamel blocks with mean SH of 343.9 (± 15.5 KHN) were selected and sterilized by exposure to ethylene oxide gas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bovine Enamel Specimen Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty-six enamel specimens (4x4x2 mm) were obtained from freshly-extracted bovine
incisors, which were previously stored in 0.1% thymol solution at room temperature.
One specimen was cut from each crown using an Isomet Low-Speed Saw cutting machine
(Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) and two diamond disks (Extec Corp., Enfield, CT, USA),
which were separated by a 4 mm thickness spacer. The enamel surface was flat with
watercooled carborundum discs (#320, 600, and 1200 of Al2O3 papers; Buehler, Lake
Bluff, IL, USA), resulting in enamel removal of about 100 μm depth. This series was
completed with polishing using felt paper made wet by diamond spray (1 μm; Buehler,
Lake Bluff, IL, USA). In order to standardize the enamel surfaces, they were selected
using a micro-hardness test by performing five indentations in different regions of
the block (Knoop diamond, 25 g, 5 s, HMV-2000; Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Enamel blocks with a Knoop hardness number ranging from 320 to 385 KHN were
selected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bovine Dentin Demineralization Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixty dentin samples (4 × 4 × 3 mm) were cut from extracted sound bovine incisor crowns using an ISOMET Low Speed Saw cutting machine (Buehler Ltda., Lake Bluff, IL, USA) and two diamond disks (Extec Corp., Enfield, CT, USA), which were separated by a 4-mm thickness spacer. The enamel surface was removed using a diamond bur (KG Sorensen 4054, Cotia, SP, Brazil), and then the dentin surface was ground flat with water-cooled carborundum discs (600 and 1200 grades of Al2O3 papers; Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) and polished with felt paper wet with diamond suspension (1 μm; Buehler, Lake Buff, IL, USA). The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo.
Dentin samples were randomly distributed into five groups (n = 12): distilled water (negative control), 0.12% CHX (positive control), 0.07% PHMB, Sanifill Perio Premium™ (0.07% PHMB plus 0.05% NaF), or F solution (0.05% NaF).
Two layers of nail varnish were applied on two-thirds of the outer dentin surface, in order to maintain reference surfaces for dentin-loss determination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparation of Enamel Blocks for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixty enamel blocks measuring 6×6×2 mm were cut using an Isomet low-speed saw cutting machine (Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, Illinois, United States) with two diamond discs (Extec Corp., Enfield, Connecticut, United States) and polished using water-cooled silicon carbide paper 600, 800 and 1,200 (Extec Corp., Enfield, Connecticut, United States) (Figure 1). To select the blocks, microhardness tests were performed following the methodology proposed by15 (link) (Figures 1A, 1B, and 1C), a using a microhardness machine (Micromet 5104; Buehler, Mitutoyo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and the blocks that obtained the same average 342,90 (Kg/mm2) ± 10% were selected for the experiment.
Schematic drawing of methodological steps. *erosive challenge before the treatments adapted from Canto, et al.27 (2020).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bovine Enamel Hardness Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polished enamel specimens (3 × 6 × 2 mm) were obtained from bovine incisor teeth, which were cut using ISOMET Low Speed Saw cutting Machine (Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL, USA). Baseline SH was determined by five indentations, using a Knoop diamond indenter, spaced 100 µm from each other. Assessments were made under 25-g load for 10 s, using an HMV -2000 (Shimadzu HMV-2; Shimadzu Corporation, Kiyamachi-Nijo, Kyoto, Japan). Enamel specimens presenting baseline SH ranging from 315 to 385 KHN were selected for the study. 12 (link) To establish the homogeneity of the samples, specimens with average surface hardness > 10% or < 350 KHN were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!