The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using prominence liquid chromatography system

1

Carbohydrate and Glycerol Analysis in Beer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration of carbohydrates and glycerol were examined by the means of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Beer samples were degassed, centrifuged (6000 rpm, 10 min), diluted (1:1) with ultrapure water and filtered through syringe nylon filters (0.45 µm pore size) to chromatographic vials. The samples were then analyzed using a Prominence liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Rezex ROA-Organic Acid H + column (300 × 4.6 mm) from Phenomex (Torrance, CA, USA). The parameters of the measurements were previously described in the work of Pietrzak et al.10 (link) Six analyses were performed for each of the beers (two repetitions from three different bottles of the same beer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC Analysis of Beer Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sugar profile and the content of glycerol were examined by means of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [40 (link)]. Beer samples were degassed and centrifuged (6000 rpm, 10 min) and then were diluted (1:1) with ultrapure water and filtered through syringe nylon filters (0.45 µm pore size) to chromatographic vials. The samples were then analyzed using a Prominence liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Rezed ROA-Organic Acid H + column (300 × 4.6 mm) from Phenomex (Torrance, CA, USA). The following measurement parameters were used: Sample volume: 20 µL; separation temperature: 60 °C; mobile phase flow rate: 0.6 mL/min; mobile phase: 0.005 M H2SO4; and detection temperature: 50 °C. The concentration of ethanol, glycerol, dextrins, maltose, glucose, and maltotriose was based on five-point calibration curves using Chromax 10.0 software (Pol-Lab, Wilkowice, Poland). Ten measurements were performed for each type of tested beer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Molecular Weights via MALS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Molecular weights were measured from P116 samples using a Superose 6 10/300 GL (GE Healthcare) column in a Prominence liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu) connected to a DAWN HELEOS II multi-angle light scattering (MALS) detector and an Optilab T-REX refractive index (dRI) detector (Wyatt Technology). ASTRA 7 software (Wyatt Technology) was used for data processing and analysis. An increment of the specific refractive index in relation to concentration changes (dn/dc) of 0.185 mL/g (typical of proteins) was assumed for calculations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Salivary Cortisol and Cortisone Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Salivary samples were obtained using a Salivette kit (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) to measure cortisol and cortisone concentrations. Once collected, samples were stored at 4 °C before being analyzed. Salivary cortisol and cortisone were measured by LC-MS/MS (Prominence liquid chromatography system; Shimadzu, Nakagyo, Japan; and 5500 Qtrap detector, Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). A liquefying agent (Sputasol; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was added to 400 µL of saliva sample, which was then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Next, solid-phase extraction with a hydrophilic lipophilic balance (WatersTM) was performed before injecting the extract into the LC-MS/MS system. The coefficients of variability for the cortisol and cortisone assays were 8 and 9%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC-Based Metabolite Separation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic separation was carried out on a prominence liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu®, Kyoto, Japan) with an HTS PAL automatic injector (CTC Ana-lytic, Zwingen, Switzerland). Chromatographic analysis was performed on a Zorbax Eclipse C18 analytical column (5 μm, 150 × 4.6 mm i.d.—Agilent Technologies®, CA, United States) in isocratic mode. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and methanol (80:20, v/v) and an aqueous solution of formic acid 0,1% (65:35, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The injection volume was 20 µL. The temperature of the autosampler and column oven were 10 °C and 40 °C, respectively. The run time was 5.50 min (Supplementary Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gel Permeation Chromatography for Polymer Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GPC was performed on a Prominence Liquid Chromatography system (Shimadzu) equipped with a RID-10A refractive index detector and three Shimadzu Shim-pack columns in series (GPC-8025D, GPC-805D and GPC-80MD) at 60 °C. 0.05 M LiCl in DMF was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Sample concentrations of 10 mg/mL were used with an injection volume of 50 µL. MW characteristics were determined with reference to a conventional calibration with PEG standards (Polymer Standards Service GmbH; molar mass at peak maximum (Mp) = 194 to 969 kDa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Organic Compounds by NMR and HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-dimensional proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of CDCl3 were recorded on a JEOL JNM‐ECA‐600 (600 MHz); residual CHCl3 (δ = 7.26 ppm) was used as an internal reference. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed using a Shimadzu Prominence liquid chromatography system with an SCL-10Avp system controller, an SPD-M20A photodiode array detector (300–800 nm), two LC-20AD pumps, a DGU-20A3 degasser, and a CTO-20AC column oven. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) was performed using a Shimadzu LCMS-2010EV system, which was based on the atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mode (Hirose et al. 2022 (link)). For all LC(-MS) analyses, the column oven was set to 30 °C.
Flash column chromatography (FCC) and reversed-phase HPLC were performed using silica gels (Merck Kieselgel 60, 0.040–0.063 mm or Wakogel C-300) and a packed octadecylated silica gel column (Cosmosil 5C18-AR-II, Nacalai Tesque), respectively. The sample was dissolved in an HPLC eluent. The solution was filtered using a Cosmonice filter (0.45 μm pore size, Nacalai Tesque), and the filtrate was subjected to HPLC. Methanol and distilled water for HPLC solvents were purchased as HPLC grade from Nacalai Tesque. Acetone for HPLC grade was purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Profiling Beer's Chemical Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sugar profile and the content of ethanol and glycerol were examined by means of High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) [26 (link)]. Degassed and centrifuged (5500 rpm, 10 min) beer samples were diluted two-fold (1:1) with ultrapure water and filtered through nylon syringe filters with 0.45 µm pore size for chromatographic vials. The samples were then analysed using a Prominence liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Rezed ROA-Organic Acid H + column (300 × 4.6 mm) from Phenomex (Torrance, CA, USA). The following measurement parameters were used: sample volume: 20 µL, separation temperature: 60 °C, mobile phase flow rate: 0.6 mL/min, mobile phase: 0.005 M H2SO4, detection temperature: 50 °C. The concentration of ethanol, glycerol, dextrins, maltose, glucose and maltotriose was based on five-point calibration curves using Chromax 10.0 software (Pol-Lab, Wilkowice, Poland). All measurements were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC-HRMS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-resolution mass spectrometry analyses with electrospray ionization (ESI) were performed using a Bruker micrOTOF–QII mass spectrometer coupled to a Shimadzu Prominence liquid chromatography system, consisting of two analytical pumps model LC-20AD, with SIL-20AHT automatic injector, SPD-20A UV/Vis detector, CTO-20A column oven, CBM-20A controller. Each compound analyzed by this technique was prepared at 1 mg/mL using LCMS-grade methanol. The column used was a Phenomenex Luna C18 (5 µm, 150 × 2 mm). The flow was 0.2 mL/min, and the mobile phase was a mixture of solvents A (0.1% HCOOH in H2O) and B (0.1% formic acid in MeOH). The gradient started at 5% B (0 min) and was maintained for 2 min. Then, B was incremented to 100% from 5 to 30 min and maintained for 5 min. The oven temperature was 40 °C, and the wavelength was 254 and 280 nm. The ESI interface was operated in positive ion mode with 4.5 kV in the capillary and 0.5 kV in the endplate offset. The pressure of the nebulization gas was 0.4 Bar; the drying gas was maintained at a flow rate of 8 L/min at 200 °C. The collision and the quadrupole energy were set to 12 and 6 eV, respectively. RF1 and RF2 funnels were programmed to 150 and 200 Vpp, respectively. The mass spectra were calibrated using sodium formate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HPLC-MS Analysis of Biomolecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC analysis was carried out using a Shimadzu Prominence liquid chromatography system, equipped with a binary mobile phase pump with an auto-sampler and a DAD detector. The stationary phase comprised a GraceVydac® C18 protein analytical column (5 μm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm). The detection wavelength of interest was 210 nm and the flow rate was maintained at 1.0 mL min−1. The gradient elution of the mobile phase consisted of (A) 0.1% TFA and (B) 100% acetonitrile with the gradient program optimised as follows: 0–30 min, linear gradient 1–100% B; 30–35 min, isocratic at 100% B, then 35–50 min 100–2% B.
Mass spectrometric electrospray ionization (ESI+-MS) analysis was performed on an Applied Biosystem/MDS Sciex Q TRAP LC/MS/MS system. Declustering potential (DP) and entrance potential (EP) were set at 200 and 10 mV respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!