The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dafm 2x bioscope

Manufactured by Veeco

The DAFM-2X Bioscope is a lab equipment product from Veeco. It is a high-resolution atomic force microscope (AFM) designed for bioimaging applications. The DAFM-2X Bioscope provides advanced imaging capabilities for the study of biological samples at the nanoscale level.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using dafm 2x bioscope

1

Intracellular Stiffness Measurement by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For quantitative measurements of intracellular stiffness, cells were plated on fibronectin-coated low or high stiffness hydrogels in 10% FBS-containing DMEM (phenol red-free). AFM in force mode or force-volume mode was used to monitor the intracellular stiffness of single adherent cells on hydrogels using a DAFM-2X Bioscope (Veeco, Woodbury, NY) mounted on an Axiovert 100 microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Cells were indented with a standard silicon nitride cantilever (spring constant =0.06 N/m) with a conical tip (40 nm in diameter). To quantify the cellular stiffness (E; Young’s modulus), the first 400 nm of tip deflection from the horizontal was fit with the Hertz model for a cone (68 ). For each experiment, 5–10 measurements of intracellular stiffness were collected near the periphery of each cell, and each experiment analyzed 8–10 cells per condition. AFM force curves were analyzed and converted to Young’s modulus using custom MATLAB scripts generously provided by Paul Janmey. Results from whole cell force-volume maps are representative of 7 (low stiffness) or 8 (high stiffness) cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Atomic Force Microscopy Stiffness Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM was conducted with a DAFM-2X Bioscope (Veeco, Woodbury, NY) mounted on an Axiovert 100 microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) using a triangular silicon nitride cantilevers with a conical tip (Veeco, model: DNP-10) for indentation over the cell lamella (as opposed to cell nucleus). The indentation was carried out at a 1 Hz loading rate and a ramp size of 3 μm. The spring constant of the cantilever, calibrated by resonance measurements, was typically 0.06 N/m. To quantify cellular stiffness, ~80 force–distance curves from 18 cells in four different samples were collected and analyzed according to the Hertz model modified for a conical probe.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Intracellular Stiffness by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular stiffness was measured by plating cells on glass coverslips or 18-mm fibronectin-coated low- or high-stiffness polyacrylamide hydrogels (2–4 and 20–25 kPa, respectively) in 10% FBS-containing culture media overnight. AFM in force mode was applied to single adherent cells using a DAFM-2X Bioscope (Veeco) mounted on an Axiovert 100 microscope (Zeiss). Cells were indented with a conical tip (40 nm in diameter) against a standard silicon nitride cantilever (spring constant = 0.06 N/m). Intracellular stiffness (Elastic modulus) was quantified by fitting the first 600 nm of tip deflection from the horizontal with the Hertz model for a cone. The tip was positioned near the edge of the cell to measure intracellular stiffness. Measurements were collected for 7–10 cells per condition, and the data were analyzed using custom MATLAB scripts generously provided by Paul Janmey.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Cell Cortical Stiffness by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell cortical stiffness measurements were performed using atomic force microscopy working in spectroscopy mode as previously described.31 (link) In brief, measurements were performed using a DAFM-2X Bioscope (Veeco, Woodbury, NY) mounted on an Axiovert microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) with silicon nitride cantilevers of a nominal spring constant of 0.06 N/m (NP-O10, Bruker, Madison, WI) and a 3.5 μm diameter polystyrene bead attached. The thermal tuning method was used for precise spring constant determination prior to the beginning of each experiment. So-called force versus distance curves were recorded on glass coverslips and successively on the sample of interest. The cantilever was moved toward the sample at the rate of 6 μm/s, and force–distance curves were analyzed assuming Hertzian contact mechanics for a spherical indenter and Poisson ratio of the sample equal to 0.5. Cells were measured 24 h post-plating and kept in appropriate culture medium during the measurement. Approximately 100 cells per condition were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!