The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stata 14.2 ic

Manufactured by StataCorp
Sourced in United States

STATA 14.2/IC is a data analysis and statistical software package developed by StataCorp. It is designed for the efficient management, analysis, and visualization of data. STATA 14.2/IC provides a comprehensive set of tools for data manipulation, regression analysis, time-series analysis, and more.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using stata 14.2 ic

1

Comparative Analysis of ACLF Subtypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient demographic, laboratory, and clinical characteristics were compared among patients with no ACLF events, APASL ACLF alone, EASL ACLF alone, and EASL + APASL ACLF. Medians and interquartile ranges were presented for continuous variables. Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-squared tests were performed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with a two-tailed alpha = 0.05 maintained as the threshold for statistical significance. STATA 14.2/IC was used for data management for this and all subsequent analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparing FNA and FNB Procedures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients undergoing FNA versus FNB were compared across a range of demographic and clinical covariates. Medians and interquartile ranges were computed for continuous variables. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum and Fisher’s exact tests were performed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, using a two-tailed alpha = 0.05 threshold for statistical significance. Data management for these and subsequent analyses were performed using STATA 14.2/IC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Surgical Simulation Effectiveness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline characteristics of the participants in the VR group were compared with those of the participants in the DL group using the Fisher exact test for categorical self-reported prior arthroscopy experience and the Student t test for comparing means of pretest scores to demonstrate a baseline. Baseline characteristics were further explored to determine if self-reported prior arthroscopy experience was associated with higher pretest scores using linear regression. The mean procedure step grades and ASSET grades were then compared between simulator groups and between PGYs using a paired t test for repeated measures, and the change in scores was tested for association with simulator groups using linear regression. Participants with incomplete data were dropped from the data set. Analysis was performed using Stata 14.2/IC (StataCorp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sarcopenia and Metabolic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frequency data are reported as numbers and percentages, and continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for low levels of handgrip strength, skeletal muscle mass index, calf circumference, or possible sarcopenia with NT (continuous variable) or MF (continuous variable). For all analyses, independent variables were adjusted for sex, age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity in Model 1. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for diabetes mellitus. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the OR and 95% CI for the diabetes mellitus outcome with NT (continuous variable) or MF (continuous variable). For all analyses, independent variables were adjusted for sex, age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity in Model 1, and additionally adjusted for possible sarcopenia in Model 2. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 14.2/IC. All p-values for statistical tests were two-tailed, and values <0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Survival Analysis of Multivariate Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The quantitative variables were expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) for those with a normal distribution and as the median and interquartile range (IQR1, IQR3) for those with a nonnormal distribution. Categorical variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies. Differences were estimated with ANOVA for numerical variables and with the chi2 test for categorical variables. Kaplan–Meier curves were used for the survival analysis with a closing date of August 1, 2018. The data were entered and analysed using the program STATA 14.2 IC (StataCorp LLC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of News Outlets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mean scores in each category for GreenState and the San Francisco Chronicle were compared using unpaired t-tests. (We also conducted a sensitivity analysis by redoing the analysis with Mann-Whitney rank-sum tests; the results were qualitatively the same.) Intercoder reliability was assessed using a two-way mixed effects single measure intraclass correlation. All analyses were performed using Stata 14.2/IC (College Station, TX).
To complement our quantitative analysis, we incorporated a qualitative description of themes prevalent in GreenState and San Francisco Chronicle articles. The qualitative analysis was two-fold. First, relevant quotations were selected from both publications that represented trends in the ISQ scores. Second, reviewers identified general themes present in articles that influenced but were not explicit components of the ISQ system (e.g. types of evidence and promotional content).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!