The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using somatom plus 4

1

Acute Brain Imaging Protocol for Clinical Trials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT-scans were performed with three different units (GE Medical System Light Speed Ultra or Light Speed Plus, Siemens Somatom Plus 4). Helical transverse scans were obtained from skull base to top of head. X-ray tube voltage was 120 kV or 140 kV. Image slice thickness was 5 mm (7,5 mm supratentorium in Siemens Somatom Plus 4). CECT scans were obtained after injection of contrast medium (Omnipaque 350 mg/ml).
The neuroradiologist (P.V.) reviewed all scans blinded to information other than the time of birth and sex of the patient. Emergent imaging findings prompting acute changes in treatment were predefined as intracranial haemorrhage, acute ischemia, CNS infection, mass effect, midline shift, obstructive hydrocephalus and/or generalized or focal brain oedema. This definition was chosen, as these pathologies prompt either surgical intervention, initiation of medication (e.g. anticoagulation, antibiotics or corticosteroid treatment), or hospitalization. NCCT and CECT images were analyzed separately, in a randomized manner. A structured eCRF (Openclinica) was filled in for each image.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body mass index was calculated as weight/height2 (kg/m2), and waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower border of the rib cage and the iliac crest. A whole body DXA scan was performed for each patient to measure total and regional lean mass (kg), total body fat (kg) and total body fat percentage (%) using fan-beam technology (QDR 4500; Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (kg) and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI [%] = total skeletal muscle mass [kg]/weight [kg]×100) were obtained as previously described [14] (link), [15] (link).
The abdominal adipose tissue area was quantified by CT (Somatom Plus 4; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Visceral fat area was calculated from a 10-mm CT slice scan image between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae that was obtained during suspended respiration. VFA was quantified by delineating the intra-abdominal cavity at the internal aspect of the abdominal and oblique muscle walls surrounding the cavity and the posterior aspect of the vertebral body. Fat attenuation was determined by measuring the mean value of the pixels within a range of −190 to −30 Hounsfield units.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Low-Dose CT Lung Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eleven cases and 19 controls included in this study underwent single-slice helical scanning (Somatom Plus 4; Siemens; Erlangen, Germany) at low-dose settings (140 kVp, 43 mAs) and 1.5 pitch with a collimation of 8 mm, providing. The rest of the cohort was scanned using a sixty-four slice multidetector CT scanner (Somatom Sensation 64, Somatom Definition, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) at a low-dose setting (120 kV tube voltage, 40 mAs tube current, 64x0.6 mm slice collimation, 0.5 s gantry rotation time, 1.4 pitch, 1 mm slice thickness, 1 mm reconstruction interval). Examinations were acquired with patients in the supine position, in cranio-caudal direction and at end-inspiration. Resulting images were reconstructed with a high convolution reconstruction algorithm (B60) and lung window [21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight and height were measured by trained clinical trial center staff while participants wore lightweight clothing without shoes. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg and height to the nearest millimeter. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of weight to the square of the height. Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the midpoint between the lower edge of the costal arch and the top of the iliac crest. After five minutes of rest, SBP and DBP were measured (in mmHg) in a seated position with a patient monitor (IntelliVue MP70, Phillips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, Netherlands). All participants underwent body composition analysis. Body composition, including percentage body fat (PBF) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), was also assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), with a commercially available body analyzer (InBody 3.0, Biospace, Seoul, Korea). Participants were scanned in the supine position using a Siemens CT scanner (Somatom Plus 4). Visceral and subcutaneous fat were analyzed in a single 10 mm thick slice at the L4 vertebral level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Adiposity Measures in Health ABC Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the present analysis measures of adiposity were collected during the baseline clinical visit. Health ABC adiposity measures are described in detail elsewhere.27 (link), 28 (link) In brief, body weight and height were measured without shoes in a hospital gown on a calibrated balance-beam scale and stadiometer. BMI was calculated by dividing weight by height squared. Abdominal circumference was measured between the lower margin of the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest, at the level of maximum circumference using a flexible inelastic fiberglass tape, with the tape parallel to the floor. Subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat areas were quantified by computed tomography (University of Tennessee Health Science Center: Somatom Plus 4, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany, and PQ 2000S, Marconi Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA; University of Pittsburgh: 9800 Advantage, General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, US). Total fat mass was measured using whole-body dual X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR 4500 software, versions 8.2–12.5 Bedford, MA, USA) and percent fat mass was calculated by dividing total fat mass by total body mass.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Assessing Vertebral Deformities via CT Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lateral scout scans were obtained in a subset of participants (n = 1038) at the baseline visit to determine placement for computed tomography (CT) abdominal scans. Images were obtained in Pittsburgh using a 9800 Advantage (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and in Memphis using a Somatom Plus 4 (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) or a Picker PQ 2000S (Marconi Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA). The CT lateral scout scans were assessed and graded for prevalent vertebral deformities by a radiologist, blinded to the diabetes status of the participants. A semiquantitative grade of 2, indicating a moderate deformity with a 25% to 40% height reduction, or grade 3, indicating a severe deformity with >40% height reduction, was defined as vertebral fracture.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whole-body CT Scans of Chilled Fish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After slaughtering, the fish were chilled immediately using ice-cube-filled
boxes. Within 6  h , whole-body scans were performed with all fish using
a Siemens Somatom Plus 4 (Siemens, Germany). During one CT scan, four fish
were positioned in parallel in an upright position using the above-described
containers without water filling. Transversal sectional images were
generated. The time required for full-body scans was 10–15  min per group
of four fish depending on the length. The following settings were selected:
voxel width 0.585938  mm , voxel height 0.585938  mm , slice thickness 3  mm ,
voltage 140  kV , rotation time 1  s , dosage 146  mA .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chest CT Imaging Protocol for GGN Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT images were acquired using various instruments, including a Somatom Plus 4 (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), LightSpeed Ultra (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI), and an Mx8000 (Philips Medical System, Andover, MA). Scanning was performed from the thoracic inlet to the lung base, with the patient at full inspiration; intravenous contrast material was not used. Images were obtained using a level of −600 Hounsfield units (HU) and a width of 1500 HU (lung window). All high resolution CT images were reconstructed into 0.625-mm-thick sections, with a tube voltage of 120–140 kV, tube current of 200–400 mA, and a 512 × 512 matrix, using a bone algorithm axial reconstruction and filtered back projection algorithm. CT images used to diagnose GGN were re-reviewed by two thoracic radiologists (QG W, LF Z), each having more than 12 years of experience in reading chest CT images, blinded to the lesion pathology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lung CT Scans for Nodule Segmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Axial lung CT scans were obtained from two CT scanners in the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital: Sensation-16, Somatom Plus 4 (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany), LightSpeed Ultra, and HiSpeed Advantage (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). More detailed scanning parameters are summarized as follows. The tube voltage was 120 kVp, and the X-ray tube currents were in the range of 100–200 mA. Slice thicknesses were 1.0–1.25 mm. The image resolution and size were 1.467 pixels per mm and 0.68 × 0.6 mm, respectively. The size of each scan was 512 × 512 with 12 bits per pixel. We obtained a total of four data sets, which consisted of about 15–40 slices, and we used a total 40 images containing nodules, which were randomly selected for testing the segmentation methods. Clinical and radiologic diagnoses were made by two experienced radiologists.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Spiral CT Protocol for Lung Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All scans were performed using the spiral CT (Somatom Plus 4; Siemens) with settings of 120 kVp, 170 mA, 2-mm slice thickness, rotation feed of 2 mm/s, and a reconstruction interval of 1 mm (total 61 scans per set) during a single breath hold for ∼24 s at FRC or TLC and moved caudally. A reference scan was acquired prior to each spiral CT scan set to ensure reproducible image location in the lung. The images were reconstructed as 16-bit 512 × 512 matrix using a field of view of 200 mm. Images were reconstructed with the use of a high-spatial frequency (resolution) algorithm that enhanced edge detection, at a window level of −450 Hounsfield units (HU) and a window width of 1,350 HU. All airways visualized approximately perpendicular to the scan plane (long- to short-axis ratio less than 1.5:1) were assessed. For repeated airway measurements in a given study participant, adjacent anatomic landmarks, such as airway or vascular branching points, were identified on the HRCT images obtained at FRC and again on the TLC scans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!