The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Unity mr linac

Manufactured by Elekta
Sourced in Sweden, United Kingdom

The Unity MR-Linac is a radiation therapy system developed by Elekta. It combines a linear accelerator (linac) for delivering radiation treatment with an integrated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. This system allows for real-time imaging during radiation delivery, providing enhanced visualization of the target and surrounding tissues.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using unity mr linac

1

MR-Linac Adaptive Radiation Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study received approval from the ethical review board of our institution and informed consent was waived. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 78 reference plans and 208 adaptive plans (129 ATP plans and 79 ATS plans) delivered using the Elekta Unity MR‐Linac (Elekta, Crawley, UK) over the past year. To avoid the impact of a single patient with many fractions, up to three fractions’ adaptive plans (initial, medium, and final fractions) were enrolled for each patient. For ATP plans, there were 37 head and neck cases, 9 thorax cases, 56 abdomen cases, and 27 pelvic cases. Conversely, all ATS plans were abdominal and pelvic cases, mostly for prostate cancer. All patients were treated with a 7 MV MR‐Linac Elekta Unity in the flattening filter‐free mode, and IMRT plans were optimized using the Monaco TPS (version 5.4, Elekta, Crawley, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

MR-Linac Imaging of Patient Breathing Motion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proposed motion models have also been evaluated on data from volunteer patients to demonstrate that they can be successfully applied to real data. Patients were consented under the PRIMER study, approved under IRAS: 208 449 and REC: 17/LO/0907. Four patients who were treated on standard linacs at our institution were scanned on a 1.5 T Elekta Unity MR-Linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The first two patients were scanned on three different treatment days, hence, a total of eight patient datasets were available. Patient details are given in table 1. For patient comfort the scans were acquired with arms down.
The 10 mm thick motion and surrogate slices were acquired using the pattern described in section 2.1.3 using a gradient echo T1-weighted sequence. An echo and repetition time of TE = 2.08 ms and TR = 4.29 ms respectively and a flip angle of 10° were selected. The in-plane resolution of the reconstructed slices was 2 × 2 mm2 and the image matrix was 160 × 160 voxels. Each repetition comprised 330 surrogate and motion slices respectively and consecutive images were acquired with a frame rate between 2.7 and 3 Hz. The acquisition of a single repetition for patient p1 took 240 s; it was 220 s for all other patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hypofractionated MR-Linac for High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study the clinical delineations of 26 patients with intermediate-and high-risk PCa were included. No patients with seminal vesicle invasion were included. The patients were treated between March 2021 and December 2021 at the Radboud University Medical Center (Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) on a 1.5 T Unity MR-Linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) in 5 fractions within the hypoFLAME 2.0 trial (NCT04045717) [19] (link). All patients provided written informed consent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Liver SPION-Enhanced MRI for Radiation Planning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was comprised of six steps (Figure 1). First, T2* image sets were acquired before and after the IV SPION-CA injection (Figure 1a) using a 1.5T Elekta Unity MR-Linac (Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden). The two sets of pre- and post-SPION T2* image sets were transferred to MiM software (v7.0.6, MIM Software Inc, Cleveland, OH, USA). The liver and tumor contours, manually delineated by a physician for radiation treatment planning, were then copied to both pre- and post-SPION T2* image sets (Figure 1b) in the MiM. Then, both liver contours of the pre- and post-SPION T2* image sets were extracted by binary masking for the voxel-wise 3D liver volumes (Figure 1c). Next, we calculated R2* relaxation rates [27 (link)] for R2* liver maps (Figure 1d) and auto-contoured FLPV (see Figure 1e). Finally, the FLPV was overlaid on the liver image. This allowed us to evaluate the efficiency of an in-house auto-contouring tool (Figure 1f) to improve conformal avoidance for further uses of FLPV during radiation treatment planning.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ferumoxytol MRI for Liver Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twelve patients (aged 53–86 years) with primary (n = 8) and metastatic liver tumors (n = 4) were enrolled in an Intuitional Review Board (IRB)-approved study at Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute (AHN-CI), Pittsburgh, PA, USA as part of a registered clinical trial study (NCT04682847). All patients underwent two MRI sessions using a 1.5T Philips MR scanner hybrid with Elekta Unity MR-Linac (Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) before and after the IV injection of the SPION-CA Ferumoxytol® (Feraheme, AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Phantom Distortion Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The third experiment quantified geometric distortion for T1- and T2-weighted images acquired on three different scanners. The phantom was imaged on a 1.5 T diagnostic scanner, a 1.5 T MR-guided linear accelerator (Unity MR-Linac, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), and a 3.0 T diagnostic scanner to demonstrate the phantom’s compatibility with different scanner geometries. T2-weighted imaging parameters were selected to be similar across the three scanners in terms of coverage, resolution, and bandwidth (table 1). It is important to note that the acquisition parameters were not selected to optimize image quality or minimize distortion across the three different scanners. For the MR-linac, scans were performed using a Q-body coil in order to cover the full bore for distortion assessment. In clinical practice, scans on the MR-linac are typically performed using a phased array coil, due to its higher sensitivity, placed over the patient’s body to enable imaging with smaller voxel sizes. For each of the described studies, the image volumes were analyzed using the developed software module.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

MRI-guided OART for Pancreatic Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chiba University Hospital (HK202304-07). The study enrolled three patients who underwent MRgOART for pancreatic cancer using Elekta Unity MR-linac (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). The patient details are presented in Table 1. At our hospital, MRIs are performed using a T2 navigator echo sequence under abdominal compression to measure respiratory movement. Patients 2 and 3 (conditions 2 and 3) who could be treated with butylscopolamine bromide (Buscopan®Injection, Paris, France) were administered the drug to suppress intestinal peristalsis. Butylscopolamine was deemed contraindicated in Patient 1 (condition 1) owing to a history of valvular heart disease. Moreover, our hospital incorporates contour delineation on images captured in multiple sequences into the workflow using the treatment planning support device MIM Maestro (MIM Software, 7.1.5, Cleveland, OH, USA) (condition 3) (9 (link), 13 (link)). The imaging sequences provided by the vendor were used for MRI acquisition, except for one sequence, T1-eTHRIVE. Table 2 presents the parameters of the imaging sequence. Figure 1 shows an example of a treatment image captured using the T2 3D Tra Navi sequence and provides an overview of our delineation study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

MR-Guided Linac Dosimetry Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed on an Elekta Unity MR-linac, featuring a 1.5 T MR scanner and a 7 MV linac. The radiation beam is shaped in CC direction using a 160-leaf MLC consisting of 7.125 mm wide leaves with fixed collimator angle, while dynamic jaws limit the radiation field perpendicular to the leaf travel direction.
In our experimental setup we used the Quasar MRI 4D phantom (Modus Medical Devices Inc., London ON) and the Delta 4 Phantom+ (ScandiDos, Sweden) for dosimetry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

MR-LINAC Integrated 1.5T MRI System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MR-images used in this study were acquired on the Philips 1.5 T MRI subsystem (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands, Model No: 7814-74) of the Elekta Unity MR-LINAC (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The Unity consists of a 1.5 T MRI combined with a ring-based gantrymounted 7 megavolt (MV) standing-wave linear accelerator. The MR is based on the Philips Marlin system, consisting of an actively shielded 1.5 T superconducting magnet, with a bore diameter of 70 cm and 130 cm length.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MR-guided Abdominal SBRT Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A flow diagram of the MRgOART workflow for abdominal SBRT is shown in Fig. 1. Each MR-gOART fraction can be divided into three phases: pre-beam, beam-on, and post-beam. Imaging, treatment planning, and radiation delivery can occur individually or simultaneously in each of these phases. The MR-Linac team consisted of two radiation therapists, one medical physicist, and one radiation oncologist. Similar to other institutions utilizing MRgOART, checklists were developed and implemented to prevent inadvertent missing of critical workflow steps. The checklists are available for download as supplementary material.

MR-guided online adaptive workflow employed for abdominal SBRT Adapt-To-Shape (ATS) treatments on the Elekta Unity MR-Linac. Continuous acquisition of MR images is performed while the patient is on the treatment table (shaded boxes). For Adapt-To-Position (ATP) treatments, the contour transfer and parallel editing and 4D-MRI verification blocks are skipped in the workflow.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!