The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

44 protocols using zombie yellow

1

Assaying Immune Responses to Toxoplasma Infection in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assay responses of mice infected with T. gondii, peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) were harvested from mice on days 0, 3, 5, or 8 postinfection (PI) by injecting 10 ml of collection solution (PBS with 5.0 mM EDTA) into the peritoneum (7 (link), 18 (link)). To examine myeloid cell populations, a single-cell suspension of PECs was collected. All single-cell suspensisons were resuspended in cell culture media (RPMI 1640) and 5 × 106 cells/well were plated. Cells were stained with Zombie Yellow (BioLegend) to assess viability. To surface stain for myeloid cells, the following fluorochrome-conjugated Abs were used: CD45, CD3, CD19, NKp46, Ly6G, CD11b, Ly6C, MHCII, F4/80, and CD11c. Intracellular staining of T-bet and T. gondii (p30) was performed by permeabilizing cells overnight at 4°C with a Foxp3/transcription factor staining buffer set (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A complete list of the clone and labeled fluorescence of the Abs is available upon request to the corresponding author. Gating strategy can be found in Supplemental Figs. 1A and 3 (link). Fluorescence was measured using an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) or Aurora flow cytometer (Cytek Biosciences), and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (version 10; Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Monocyte Subset Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs were stained for viability (Zombie Yellow, BioLegend, San Diego, CA) [23 (link)]. Anti-Fc receptor and True-stain Monocyte Blocker (BioLegend) were used to reduce nonspecific antibody and fluorophore binding before cells were labeled with antibodies. Non-monocytic cells were excluded with a “dump” channel containing CD3, CD19, CD20, CD56, and CD66b. Staining with CD14 and CD16 identified the two major human monocytic subsets. The antibodies used for IL-4 and chemokine receptor identification are listed in Table 2. Stained cells were acquired with a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA), courtesy of the Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Flow Cytometry Core. CytEXPERT software v.2.0 (Beckman-Coulter) was used for analysis, and isotype control antibody-labeled cells were used to set negative gates. Data are reported as the change in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the different receptors (MFI target – MFI isotype).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Modulation of T-cell Activation and Cytokine Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IL-1Ra (R&D Systems; 480-RM, 50ng/mL), rTNFα (Peprotech; 315–01Am, 20ng/mL), αCD3e (Biolegend; 100331 for in vitro assays and 100340 for in vivo assays), αTNF (Biolegend; 506332, 20μg/mL), αFasL (Biolegend; 106608, 10μg/mL), αCD40L (Biolegend; 310812, 10 μg/mL), IL-1β ELISA (R&D Systems; DY-401), TNFα ELISA(Biolegend; 510802 for capture and 506312 for detection), Naïve T cell Mojosort (Biolegend; 480040), total CD4+ T cell Mojosort (Biolegend; 480006), Zombie yellow (Biolegend; 423103), DAPI (Biolegend; 422801), IETD (R&D Systems; FMK007, 10μM), rGMCSF (Biolegend; 576306), Anti-biotin beads (Miltenyi Biotec; 130–090-485), OVA323–339 (Invivogen; vac-isq), LPS (Sigma, 100ng/mL), ATP (Invivogen; tlrl-ATPl, 5nM), IL17a ELISA (Biolegend; 506902 for capture and 507002 for detection), EAE immunization kit (Hooke Laboratories, EK-2110) mouse MOG35–55 (CSbiologicals, CS0681)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometric Characterization of PBMC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated PBMCs from each collection time point both fresh and after in vitro stimulation for 5 days, were characterized by flow cytometric techniques. Antibodies, suppliers, and concentrations are given in the supplemental material (see Table S1). After 5 days of culture in vitro, cell trace labeled cells were harvested by centrifugation and labeled with live/dead discriminator dye (Zombie yellow; BioLegend), Cells were labeled with antibodies for surface markers given in Table S1 and analyzed on a FACSAria flow cytometer (BD). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software. An example of a gating scheme is given in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material. Cells were gated on viability dye exclusion followed by forward scatter/side scatter profile historically consistent with bovine lymphocytes. Lymphocyte populations were plotted against the fluorescent intensity of each antibody in the following pairs: CD4 versus B cell markers and CD8 versus γδ TCR. Positive marker gates for each subset were determined by a cell pool containing all antibodies except the antibody of interest and the isotype of the antibody of interest. An increase or decrease in the percentage of cells expressing a specific marker was determined by comparison to cells from wells without antigenic stimulation (background).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zombie Yellow (BioLegend) was used for all live/dead staining. For mouse experiments, antibodies from the following companies were used: Tonbo Biosciences: CD45.2-PerCP/Cy5.5 (104), CD11b-APC (M1/70), F480-PerCP/Cy5.5 (BM8.1), CD45-PE/Cy7 (30-F11) CD3-FITC (145-2C11); BioLegend: F480-PE/Cy7 (BM8), Ly6G-FITC (1A8), Ly6C-APC/Cy7 (HK1.4), I-A/I-E-PacBlue (M5/114.15.2), CD4-APC (RM4-5), CD25-APC/Cy7 (PC61), Foxp3-PacBlue (MF-14), CD8b-PerCP/Cy5.5 (YTS156.7.7), H-2Kb-PE (AF6-88.5). For human experiments, antibodies from the following companies were used: Tonbo Biosciences: CD45-PE/Cy7 (HI30); BioLegend: CD14-APC (HCD14), CD15-FITC (HI98), HLA-DR-APC/Cy7 (L243), CD33-PerCP/Cy5.5 (WM53), CD11b-PacBlue (ICRF44); Sino Biological: VNN2-PE (04). Samples were run on a BD LSRII cytometer and analyzed by FlowJo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Intracellular Cytokine Staining of Influenza-Specific Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse lung-derived lymphocytes were stimulated for 5 hours with 1μM InfluenzaNP366-374 (ASNENMETM) with Brefeldin A included in the incubation. Following stimulation, cells were then stained with Zombie Yellow (BioLegend) to exclude dead cells from the downstream analysis. Staining for intracellular cytokines was performed as previously described 26 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoparticle-Mediated Antigen Uptake in BMDCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Day 8 BMDC (Section 2.9) were plated in 24-well plates [4 × 105 cells/well] as described (Section 2.10) but incubated at 4°C or 37°C for 1 h. Media was aspirated and cRPMI [0.5 mL] or cRPMI containing F-OVA [1.6 μg total] encapsulated at 7.8 wt% in the indicated NP [20 μg NP] was added to the wells and incubated [4°C or 37°C, 2 h]. Cells were washed with PBS, stained with Zombie Yellow (BioLegend) and anti-mouse CD11c-PE Cy5 (clone N418, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), then analyzed by flow cytometry gating by forward and side light scattering, Zombie Yellow exclusion, PE, and fluorescein using unstained cells as background as described (Section 2.10). Average percent of total viable CD11c+ cells with F-OVA staining and average median fluorescence intensities (MFI) of F-OVA staining ± SD (n=2 wells) were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alive/dead stain was included to measure viability (Zombie Yellow, BioLegend). Cells were blocked with anti-FcγRIII (2.4G2) prior to surface staining. Cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for surface analysis or fixed with Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Bioscience) for intracellular staining. For intranuclear staining, cells were fixed in Cytofix/Cytoperm and Cytoperm Plus buffer (BD) and DNase treated. For phospho mTOR staining, cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with methanol. For phospho AMPK staining, cells were fixed with Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Bioscience), and stained overnight at 4C with anti-pAMPK. Data was acquired on a Cytek-modified FACScan (BD and Cytek) or LSRFortessa (BD); data was analyzed using FlowJo 7.6.5. Geometric mean fluorescence intensity and % proliferated were calculated using FlowJo proliferation analysis (see below). The following fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies were used: BrdU (BrdU kit, BD), CD107a (1D4B, BD), CD3ε (145-2C11, BD/BioLegend), CD11b (M1/70, BD), CD226/DNAM-1 (10E5, BioLegend), CD27 (LG.3A10, BD), CD45.1 (A20 Biolegend), anti-human IFN-γ (XMG1.2, BioLegend), Ly49C/I (5E6, BD), Ly49H (3D10, BD/BioLegend), NK1.1 (PK136, BD), NKG2A/C/E (20d5, BD), NKG2D (CX5, Biolegend), NKp46 (29A1.4, BD), pAMPKa, (40H9, Cell Signaling), and pMTOR (MRRBY, Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Cycle Analysis of HCT116 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell cycling in the HCT116 cells was measured via PI staining of DNA whereby the dividing cells (G2/M) contain double the amount of DNA as those in the growth phases (G0/G1), and therefore are detected by flow cytometry at differing fluorescent intensities. During collection of the PI and zombie yellow (BioLegend, CA, USA) stained cells the living cells (zombie negative) were gated on to remove any false positives in the PI cell cycling plots. Two cell cycling plots were used to detect the shift in population fluorescence, the first being a scatter plot of PI versus forward scatter area to visualise the density and spread of PI-stained cells, and the second being a histogram of cell count versus PI to measure the percent of cells in each phase (Supplementary Figure 12.2). The histogram was then used to analyse the change of cell percentages per cell cycle phase (G0/G1, S or G2/M) in the EG1 treated compared to the control populations. This analysis was done using Kaluza analysis software (version 2.1.1, 2018) by setting gates that encompass the peaks which appear for the G0/G1 phases and S phase; however a defined G2/M phase occurred only at 96 hours. The analysis software was then able to measure the percentage of cells within each of these gates to produce the values which were used to make the cell cycling figure in Rstudio (version 1.4, 2020).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Purification and Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IEL cells were purified using a Percoll gradient as previously described41 (link). An aliquot was subjected to heating at 65 °C for 20 min to induce cell death. Dead cells were pooled with live cells to serve as an internal control for live/dead staining, which was performed using zombie yellow (Biolegend) as per the manufacturers’ directions. Cells were then washed twice in 2 ml of cold PBS for 5 min, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature and pre-treated with anti-Fc antibody for 1 h and subsequently for 2 h with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies. Cells were then washed to remove excess antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry, gating to count live CD45+ cells and analyzed for the abundance of TCR+ , TCR− and sub population of CD8+ cells, F4/80 macrophages or M1/M2 macrophages (CD11c or CD206; see Supplementary Table 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!