The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using ki 67 ncl ki67p

1

Histological Evaluation of Wound Healing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After photographing the wound on day 14, skin tissue including the wound area was excised for pathological examination. The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin for 24 h. The sections were processed routinely and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). By microscopic examination using the HE-stained samples, the thickness of the granulation tissue and the regeneration of the epithelium at the skin defect were measured.
As well as HE staining, some of the specimens obtained from animals in two groups (Untreated RU and ASCs spheroids NS for RU groups) were used for immunohisitological examination using CD31 (DIA-300; DIANOVA GimbH, Hamburg, Germany) and Ki-67 (NCL-Ki67p; Leica Biosystems, Newcastle, UK) antibodies. Briefly, for both stains, antigen retrieval was performed in paraffin-embedded sections with 10 mM citrate buffer for 10 min. Thereafter, 3% H2O2 was used to inactivate endogenous peroxidase, and Blocking One (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) was used to block nonspecific binding reactions. The sections were then incubated with primary and secondary antibodies. The sections were treated with 3, 3′‐diaminobenzidine‐4HCl (DAB) and Mayer's hematoxylin nuclear counterstain as per the usual protocols. Microscopic images were taken of five random fields from each slide at high power fields (×400). The positive cells were counted and the average value was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemistry Analysis of Muscle Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described (Taulli et al., 2009 (link)) with the specified antibodies. Ki67 (#NCL-Ki67p) was from Leica Biosystems (UK); MyoD (#M3512) was from Dako (Denmark); Myogenin (DSHB (Iowa City, IA) Hybridoma Product F5D was deposited by Wright, Woodring E.); Pax7 (DSHB Hybridoma Product PAX7 was deposited by Kawakami, Atsushi); eMHC (DSHB Hybridoma Product F1.652 was deposited by Blau, H.M.); P-Met (#3126) and PDGFRα (#3164) were from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA); Met (#18–7366) was from Invitrogen. Fiber cross-sectional areas were measured using ImageJ software (rsb.info.nih.gov/ij). Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel software, with a moving average (period 4) trendline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Profiling of TRAMP Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In TRAMP PCa, immunostaining for apoptotic (cl-caspase-3, Cell Signaling Technology) and proliferating (Ki67, NCL-Ki67p, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) cells was performed using rabbit polyclonal and biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) as previously described [50 (link)]. Blood vessel density was determined by immunostaining for CD31 using a goat polyclonal antibody (M20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and a biotinylated rabbit anti-goat secondary antibody. Immunostaining for Mcl-1 (S-19) was performed using a 1/50 dilution of rabbit polyclonal and biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody. Immunostaining for γH2AX (clone JBW301# 05-636; EMD Bioscience) was performed using a 1/200 dilution of mouse monoclonal and the Vector Mouse on Mouse Peroxidase Kit (Vector Laboratories) following the manufacturer's instructions. The number of cleaved caspase-3, Ki67, γH2AX positive cells and CD31 positive vessels were determined for 1198, BA, 1198 + BA, and vehicle controls (n=3-5 each group), as previously described [51 (link)]. For negative controls, we used the same concentration of mouse or rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) instead of specific primary antibodies, resulting in lack of immunostaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation of tissues, sectioning, and antibody staining were performed as described (14 (link)). Antibodies used were purchased from the following sources: Calponin (EP798Y, ab46794); CD3 (ab5690-100); F4/80 (CI:A3-1, ab6640); Phospho-SMAD3 (phospho S423+S425, ab51451) were from Abcam, Cambridge, MA; HGF (N-terminal, LSB4012) was from Lifespan Biosciences; Seattle, WA; Ki67 (NCL-Ki67p) was from Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL; Phospho-cMet (pYpYpY1230/1234/1235, 44888G) was from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA; Phospho-ERK (THR202/TYR204, 4370p), and Phospho-STAT3 (9145), were from Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA.; Phospho-histone H3 (Ser10, 06-570), was from Millipore, Bellerica, MA; P-MSPR/RON (AF1947) was from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblotting and Immunofluorescence Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoblotting and immunofluorescence the following antibodies were used: p21 (12D1, Cell Signalling, UK; 1:2,000), p16 (10883‐1‐AP, Protein‐Tech, UK; 1:2,000), Ki67 (NCL‐Ki67p, Novocastra, UK;1: 1,000), IL‐8 (AF‐208‐NA, R and D Systems, UK; 1:500), CD9 (CD9A‐1, System Biosciences, UK; 1:1,000) TSG101 (ab30871, Abcam, UK; 1:1,000), Calnexin (ab22595, Abcam, UK; 1:1,000), HRP‐conjugated goat anti‐rabbit (Dako, UK; 1:5,000), HRP‐conjugated rabbit anti‐goat (Dako, UK; 1:5,000), goat anti‐rabbit‐Alexa Fluor 546 (Thermo‐Fisher, UK; 1:500), Rabbit anti‐goat‐Alexa Fluor 546 (A10040,Thermo‐Fisher, UK; 1:500).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunostaining of Cell Cycle Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used in for immunofluorescence staining: p21 (2947, Cell Signalling, UK; 1:500), Ki67 (NCL-Ki67p, Novocastra, Cell Signalling, UK; 1:1,000), γH2AX (05-636, Upstate Cell Signalling Technologies; 1:2,000), 53BP1 (A300-273A, Bethyl laboratories, 1:200), goat anti-mouse-Alexa Fluor 488 (A32723, Thermo Fisher, UK; 1:500) and donkey anti-rabbit-Alexa Fluor 546 (A10040, Thermo Fisher, UK; 1:500). Immunohistochemistry for p21 was performed using mouse anti-human p21 (M7202, Agilent Dako, US, 1:100), recombinant IgG1+IgG2+IgG3 bridging antibody (ab1334569, Abcam, UK, 1:500) and OmniMap anti-Rb HRP secondary antibody (5269679001, Roche, according to the manufacturer’s instructions).”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Labeling of Neural Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence, every 6th section was collected and washed in PBS. The sections were then incubated for 2 h in blocking buffer PBS-plus (10% donkey serum, 0.2% Triton-X 100 in PBS) to block unspecific binding sites and to permeabilize the tissues. After the blocking step, the sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies diluted in incubation buffer (PBS with 3% donkey serum). The following primary antibodies and concentrations were used: rabbit-anti GFAP (Z0334, 1:1000, Dako), goat-anti Doublecortin (sc-8066, 1:250, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse-anti Prox1 (MAB5654, 1:500, Chemicon International), rabbit-anti Ki67 (NCL-Ki67p 1:500, Novocastra), rabbit-anti Tbr2 (23345, 1:800, Abcam), goat-anti Sox2 (sc-17320, 1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), goat-anti NeuroD (sc-1086, 1:400, Santa Cruz), rabbit-anti BLBP (ab32423, 1:400, Abcam). After several washes in PBS, the sections were incubated for 4 h at room temperature in secondary antibodies diluted in incubation buffer. The concentration of secondary antibodies CY3 (711-495-152, Jackson Immuno Research) and CY5 (715-175-15, Jackson Immuno Research) was 1:500. After the incubation, sections were washed several times in PBS and incubated in DAPI (861405, 1:4000, Invitrogen) for 10 min, then washed again in PBS and mounted on slides in Aqua Poly/Mount.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!