The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using iqon spectral

1

Whole-Body Low-Dose CT Imaging Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT examinations were performed without administration of intravenous or oral contrast medium on one of our six multidetector CT scanners (SOMATOM Force, SOMATOM Definition Flash, SOMATOM Definition Edge; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany; GE Discovery, GE Revolution; VCT, Boston, MA, USA; IQon Spectral, Philips, Best, the Netherlands). Patients were scanned in supine position, with head first and the arms straight beside the body and hands placed over the upper thighs. The field of view was adapted to the patient’s circumference.
WBLDCT imaging parameters per used device are depicted in Table 1.

Whole-body CT imaging parameters per device

DeviceNo. of slices per rotationTube voltage (kVp)Tube current modulation parametersCollimation widthRotation time (s)Pitch
Revolution CT, GE25612020 (noise index)80 mm0.50.992
Discovery CT750, GE6412020 (noise index)40 mm0.50.984
Definition Edge, Siemens12812070 (quality reference mAs)38.4 mm0.51
Definition Flash, Siemens12812070 (quality reference mAs)38.4 mm0.51
SOMATOM Force, Siemens19212070 (quality reference mAs)57.6 mm0.51
IQon, Philips12812012 (dose right index)40 mm0.51.171
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Standardized Abdominal CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CT scans were performed on a Brilliance iCT 256, an IQon-spectral and a Brilliance 64 scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). CT examination was performed with a tube voltage of 120 kV and a reference tube current of 127 mAs, 116 mAs, and 102 mAs for the three scanners respectively. A gantry rotation time of 0.4 s, 0.27 s and 0.4 s respectively and a detector collimation of: 128 × 0.625 mm, 64 × 0.625 mm, and 64 × 0.625 mm respectively. For the unenhanced phases, images were displayed in the axial plane as 5 mm-thick sections with 4 mm increments. The portal venous phase images were displayed in axial, coronal, and sagittal plane, with 5 mm-thick slices and 4 mm increments. A B (abdominal) kernel at iDose level 3 was used to reconstruct the images. The scan range was the upper abdomen for the unenhanced phase. For the portal venous phase the range was set 1 cm superior of the diaphragm to the lower pelvis.
Bolus tracking was used to determine imaging timing, by measuring a circular region of interest (ROI) in the abdominal aorta. Delay post-threshold (150 HU) before scanning was set at 90 s for the portal venous phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Contrast-Enhanced CT Evaluation of Cystic Renal Masses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent unenhanced and dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT using three CT scanners (Definition flash, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany/ in Guangzhou; IQon Spectral, Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands/ in Guangzhou; Aquilion One 750W, Canon, Tokyo, Japan/ in Zhuhai). Imaging parameters were: tube voltage 120 kV, tube current 250 mA, section interval 5 mm, section thickness 5 mm, and matrix 512 mm × 512 mm. After conventional unenhanced imaging, 100–120 ml iopromide (Ultravist 370, Bayer Schering Pharma, Germany) was injected into the median cubital vein via a pump injector (MEDRADStellant CT, Ulrich Medical, Ulm, Germany) at 3–4 ml/s. The AP scan was triggered by aortic enhancement. The VP scan started at a delay of 60 s from the beginning of contrast injection.
One radiologist (LH) with 18 years of experience analyzed the CT images to ensure the renal masses had < 25% enhancing tissue (i.e. lesions were cystic masses), confirm the Bosniak class (Version 2019), and determine the size of the CRMs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Abdominal CECT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent abdominopelvic CECT scans before surgery. The scans were performed using the Brilliance 16 and IQon Spectral scanners (both Philips Healthcare, Netherlands), SOMATOM scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Germany) or Discovery 750 HD scanner (GE Healthcare, USA). Detailed information regarding the CT equipment used at each center is presented in Additional file 1: Table S1. In all patients, the CECT was acquired 50 s after an injection of iodinated contrast media (370 mg I/mL, Heng Rui Pharma, Jiangsu, China; 3–4 mL/s, 1.5 mL/kg body weight) via the antecubital vein using a high-pressure syringe (Ulrich, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dual-Phase Enhanced CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dual-phase enhanced CT examinations were performed using Aquilion One Vision (Canon Medical Systems), Aquilion Prime (Canon Medical Systems), IQon Spectral (Philips Healthcare), and Brilliance iCT (Philips Healthcare). The CT scanning protocol is detailed in Supplementary A1 (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C43) and Supplementary Table S1 (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C43).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chest CT Imaging of COVID-19 Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chest CT was performed using a 4–320-row multi-detector CT unit (Aquilion PRIME, Aquilion ONE, Aquilion Precision, Alexion, Aquilion, Activion 16, Asteion; Canon, Tochigi, Japan; Revolution CT, Revolution Frontier, Revolution EVO, Discovery CT750 HD, LightSpeed VCT, Optima CT660; GE, Tokyo, Japan; SOMATOM Emotion 6, SOMATOM go.Up; Siemens, Tokyo, Japan; IQon-Spectral; Philips, Tokyo, Japan) applying the following parameters: tube voltage, 120–140 kVp; effective current 69–749 mA; spiral pitch factor, 0.798–1.5, helical pitch, 7.2–127, the field of view, 27.5–45 cm; matrix size, 512 × 512. Acquisition parameters were modified to minimize patient radiation exposure while maintaining sufficient resolution for chest CT evaluation. A 1.0–5.0-mm gapless section was reconstructed before being reviewed on the picture archiving and communication system monitor. In total, 142 patients (COVID-19, n = 24; non-COVID-19, n = 118) were evaluated on CT with a slice thickness of 3 mm or less; 12 patients (COVID-19, n = 2; non-COVID-19, n = 10) were evaluated on CT with a slice thickness of 5 mm. Contrast-enhanced CT was performed in 28 patients, while the other 126 patients underwent plain CT alone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Spectral CT Imaging of Closed-Mouth Subjects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the CT images were obtained from a DLCT scanner (Spectral IQON, Philips
Healthcare, Best, Netherlands). The CT scanning parameters were listed as the
following: tube voltage 120 kVp with automated attenuation-based dose
modulation, rotation time 0.5 s, pitch 0.359, collimation 64 × 0.625, slice
thickness 3 mm, filed of view (FOV) 220 × 220 mm. The subjects only received the
CT scan with a closed mouth, and the open mouth position CT scan was not
performed in the current study.
Conventional images and spectral base images (SBI) were reconstructed from the
same dataset with an axial slice thickness of 0.67 mm and an increment of
0.67 mm. Conventional images were reconstructed using iDose level 2 (Philips
Healthcare), and SBI data were reconstructed based on Spectral level 2 (Philips
Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Dual-Layer Detector CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patients were examined using a dual-layer detector CT unit (Spectral IQON ® , Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands). CT images were acquired using a tube voltage of 120 kVp, an automated attenuation-based dose modulation (DoseRight, Philips Healthcare), a rotation time of 0.27 s, a collimation of 64 × 0.625, and a slice thickness of 1 mm. Additionally, conventional images and spectral images were reconstructed using iDose level 2 (Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands) and Spectral level 2 (Philips Health-care, the Netherlands), respectively. For comparison of SDCT and MRI, sagittal images were reconstructed and evaluated with a slice thickness of 3 mm. From the same dataset, both conventional (CCT) images and overlaid conventional/electron density (C + ED) images were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!