The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using ab16030

1

Protein Expression Analysis in CRC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were extracted from CRC tissue and cell samples by the RIPA reagent obtained from Sigma, USA, and separated using 10% SDS-PAGE. The isolated proteins were transferred into PVDF membranes followed by 5% nonfat milk incubation to minimize the noise. Next, the membranes were immersed in milk containing primary antibodies against SOCS3 (Rabbit, 1:2000, ab16030, Abcam, UK), CD133 (Rabbit, 1:1000, ab216323, Abcam), SOX2 (Mouse, 1:2000, ab171380, Abcam), OCT4 (Rabbit, 1:5000, ab109183, Abcam), AKT (Rabbit, 1:500, ab8805, Abcam), STAT3 (Mouse, 1:5000, ab119352, Abcam), p-AKT (Rabbit, 1:1000, ab38449, Abcam), p-STAT3 (Rabbit, 1:5000, ab76315, Abcam), and GAPDH (Rabbit, 1:3000, ab124905, Abcam), and incubated overnight. After excess primary antibodies were washed off by PBS, the membranes were probed by HRP-conjunct secondary antibodies, and the signals were visualized using the ECL reagent (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of SOCS Proteins in Cervical SCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tissue samples were obtained with full ethical approval from the KIRAMS institutional review board (IRB No. K-1103-003-016). Immunohistochemical staining for SOCS1, SOCS3, and SOCS5 were performed by an automated immunohistochemical stainer (Autostainer 480, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fremont, CA, USA) on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections of squamous cell carcinomas obtained from uterine cervix. Sections were deparaffinized with xylene for 15 min and pretreated in a microwave oven using 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 30 min. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies directed against SOCS1 (1:25, ab62584, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), SOCS3 (1:100, ab16030, Abcam) and SOCS5 (1:100, sc-100858, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 60 min at room temperature and detected using UltraVision LP Detection System HRP Polymer & DAB Plus Chromogen (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tissue samples were cut into 4‐μm sections. After antigen retrieval, the sections were incubated overnight with the first antibody (PCNA, 2586, CST, 1:1000; Ki67, AB9260, millipore, 1:20; Cyclin D1, 2978, CST, 1:100; CAPNS1, HPA006872, Atlas Antibodies, 1:200; P‐STAT3, ab68653, Abcam, 1:100; SOCS3, ab16030, Abcam, 1:100). A standard two‐step immunoperoxidase‐labeled protocol with goat anti‐rat HRP (EnVision, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) was applied stringently on all slides. Immunohistochemical analysis results was evaluated by immunohistochemistry score (IHS), HIS = A × B (A: positive cell number; B: grading of color intensity of positive cells, 0 [negative], 1 [weak positive], 2 [positive], 3 [strong positive]). Two pathologists assessed the slides without knowledge of subgroups of rats and were blinded to each other's evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Analysis in Arc and NTS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein from Arc and NTS were extracted by homogenization in ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (phosphate-buffered saline, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1 mmol/l phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, aprotinin 5 μg/ml, leupeptin 10 μg/ml, pepstatin A 1 μg/ml and phosphatase inhibitors cocktail). Homogenates were centrifuged for 25 min at 14,000g, supernatants collected and extract normalized to total protein content. The protein concentration was measured by BCA protein assay reagent kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, transfer to nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and blots was blocked for 1 h in 5% milk. Blots were incubated with antibodies to NPY (ab91262), SCOCS3 (ab16030), POMC (ab94446), ObRb (ab5593) and pSTAT3 (ab5073) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 1:1000) overnight at 4C°, and then incubated with their respective secondary antibody for one hour. Expression was normalized to GAPDH (CW bio CW0266A, Beijing, China, 1:1000) and protein intensities were determined and analyzed using Odyssey® Imager (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblotting Analysis of Heart Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein lysate samples were prepared from heart tissues in tissue extraction reagent (Invitrogen, FNN0071) supplemented with proteinase inhibitors. Lysate samples (30 μg total protein for each) were separated by 10% SDS–PAGE and electrophoretically transferred to PVDF membranes. SOCS1 protein was probed with goat antibody to SOCS1 (Abcam, ab9870; 1:1000 dilution). SOCS3 protein was probed with rabbit antibody to SOCS3 (Abcam, ab16030; 1:1000 dilution). STAT3 protein was probed with mouse antibody to STAT3 (CST, #9139; 1:1000 dilution). Phospho-STAT3 protein was probed with rabbit antibody to phosho-STAT3 (CST, #9145; 1:1000 dilution). PTEN protein was probed with rabbit antibody to PTEN (CST, #9188; 1:1000 dilution). Bim protein was probed with rabbit antibody to Bim (CST, #2933; 1:1000 dilution). Cleaved-caspase3 protein was probed with rabbit antibody to cleaved-caspase3 (CST, #9661; 1:1000 dilution). Bcl2 protein was probed with rabbit antibody to Bcl2 (CST, #3498; 1:1000 dilution). Bax protein was probed with rabbit antibody to Bax (CST, #2772; 1:1000 dilution). Protein bands were visualized with the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc imaging system. All the antibody information is listed in Supplementary Table 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells or brain tissues were collected and lysed with lysis buffer (Beyotime) containing protease inhibitor (Roche). The protein concentration was measured using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). The lysates samples with equal amounts of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis (PAGE) and then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF; Millipore). After blocking with 5% skim milk-TBST for 1 h, the indicated targets were probed with primary antibodies and appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The antibodies used in the experiments include anti-IE1 [61 (link)] and anti-pUL97 (gift from William J. Britt, University of Alabama, USA)[62 (link)], anti-IE1/2 (p1215, Virusys), anti-pp65 (p1205, Virusys), anti-UL44 (p1202-1, Virusys), anti-pp28 (CA004-1,Virusys), anti-mIE1 [63 (link)], anti-GAPDH (10494-1-AP, Protientech), anti-FLAG (20543-1-AP, Protientech), anti-RFX7 (NBP1-71819, Novus), anti-SOCS3 (ab16030, Abcam), anti-GFAP (16825-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-Nestin (19483-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-DCX (13925-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-SOX2 (ab97959, Abcam), Phospho-(Ser/Thr) Substrate Antibody (9611S, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-STAT3 (10253-2-AP, Proteintech) and anti-Phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705) (9145, Cell Signaling Technology). The protein bands were detected using a Chemiluminescence machine and analyzed by a densitometry program (Image J).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Intestinal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heat‐Induced Epitope Retrieval using sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) was performed on dewaxed and rehydrated cecal sections. Sections were blocked in 10% normal serum in TBS + 1% BSA for 2 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody (rat IDO 1:400, Santa Cruz sc‐53978, Dallas, TX; rabbit SOCS3 1:1000, Abcam ab16030; Rabbit MUC2 1:200, Abcam ab76774). Secondary antibodies: AlexaFluor 488 goat anti‐rat IgG 1:500, AlexaFluor 488 donkey anti‐rabbit IgG 1:1000 or AlexaFluor 647 donkey anti‐rabbit IgG 1:1000 (Life Technologies) were incubated for 2 h and cells counterstained with propidium iodide or Hoeschst 33342, before mounting and viewing on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. Quantification of IDO positive cells was carried out using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Investigating HCMV-induced SOCS3 expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NPCs were seeded on poly-D-lysine-coated coverslips in 12-well plates and infected with HCMV after attachment. The coverslips were harvested and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at the indicated times post-infection. PBS-perfused Brains were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and prepared for IFA. anti-SOCS3 (IgG2b; ab14939, Abcam), anti-SOCS3 (Rabbit; ab16030, Abcam), anti-HA (Rabbit; Covance) and anti-IE1/2 (IgG1; Virusys) were detected by primary antibodies and appropriate secondary antibodies [35 (link),64 (link)]. The secondary antibodies included TRITC-mouse IgG2b (1090–03, Southern Biotech), Alexa Fluor 488-mouse IgG1 (A-21121, Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor 647-rabbit (A-21247, Invitrogen), and Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2- phenylindole) (D9542, Merck).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemistry Analysis of Mice Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical Staining performed after being dewaxed of mice tissue sections. Sections permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and blocked with 10% goat serum at room temperature for 1 h. Samples were incubated with anti-rabbit SOCS3 antibody (for;1:500, ab16030, Abcam, USA), anti-rabbit MMP9 (1:500, ab76003, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-rabbit-AQP9 antibody (1:600, ab84828, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and anti-rabbit-MPO antibody (1:600, EPR20257, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) at 4°C overnight. On the 2nd day, slides were incubated with goat anti-rabbit/rabbit FITC secondary antibody for 1h at room temperature. The nuclei were dyed by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 5min (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Vector, ZsBio, Beijing, China). Images were obtained using Zeiss fluorescence microscope (Germany) and Nikon microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). At least five fields for each coverslip were captured. The number of cells, antigen distribution, and cellular fluorescence intensity that represented antigenicity were measured using the captured images. The image analysis was performed with ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunostaining of Transfected Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transfected neurons were treated and fixed as described above. After fixation, cells were rinsed in PBS and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 detergent (Bio-Rad Laboratories), followed by 2 rinses in PBS, and blocked with 5% BSA in PBS for 30minutes. Cells were rinsed with PBS again, and incubated with antibodies; (anti-vesicular glutamate transporter (VGLUT)1 (NeuroMab #75–066, 1:250), anti-SOCS3 (Abcam #ab16030, 1:500) or anti-pSTAT3 (Abcam #ab76315, 1:500) diluted in IHC-Tek (#IW-1001) for 2 hours at room temperature with mild shaking. Cells were rinsed with PBS three times and incubated in the appropriate Alexa Fluor secondary IgG antibodies (Thermo Fisher #A31571 and #A11035, 1:1000) for 2 hours at room temperature. Then, they were incubated in Hoechst (Invitrogen #3570, 1:1000) for 10 minutes. They were washed with PBS three times and mounted with Elvanol. Neurons for colocalization analysis were imaged as described in the Spine quantification section and juxtaposition of spines with presynaptic marker were quantified using ImageJ. For analysis of pSTAT3 and SOCS3 fluorescence intensity, in ImageJ, the z-stacks were summed, and background intensity were subtracted. Either whole neuron (Clover) or just nucleus (Hoechst) have been used as a mask and mean fluorescent intensity were reported due to the differences in neuron size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!