The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using glycerin

1

Topical Formulation Development and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SN was purchased from 2A Pharmachem (Lisle, IL, USA). PEG 400 and propylene glycol were provided by BASF (Tarrytown, NY, USA). Klucel® (hydroxypropylcellulose) was provided by Ashland Inc. (Bridgewater, NJ, USA) while isopropyl myristate was from Croda Inc. (Edison, NJ, USA). Ascorbic acid and menthol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) while glycerin was from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Anhydrous ethanol (200 proof) was purchased from Acros Organic (Morris Plains, NJ, USA). All other reagents used were of high purity or HPLC grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microneedle-Based Vaccine Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stainless steel microneedles were fabricated as previously described [49 (link), 50 (link)]. Briefly, microneedles were fabricated from stainless steel sheets (Trinity Brand Industries, SS 304, 75 μm thick; McMaster-Carr, Atlanta, GA) by laser cutting. Microneedles were electropolished (model no. E399-100, ESMA, IL) for deburring, cleaning and sharpness in a solution containing glycerin, ortho-phosphoric acid (85%) and deionized water in a ratio of 6:3:1 by volume (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ). The final microneedle geometry was a linear array of five needles with a needle-to-needle spacing of 1575 μm. The concentrated vaccines were combined with an equal volume of coating solution composed of 2% w/v carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and 30% w/v trehalose dihydrate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Microneedles were coated by repeated dip-coating into the antigen coating solution using a custom-built coating instrument [49 (link)]. The vaccine load per array was estimated with SRID assay and the amount of required vaccine dose per mouse was adjusted by cutting extra needles from the array.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Activity Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ethanol, formamide, phosphoric acid, sodium hydroxide, glucose, CASO broth, bacteriological peptone, and trypticase agar were supplied by Merck (Kenilworth, NJ, USA). Acetone (J.T. Baker, Landsmeer, The Netherlands), propylene carbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), glycerin (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and Hartmann’s solution or Ringer’s lactate USP (Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA) were used without further purification. The bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 15442) and Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6051) and the yeasts Candida krusei (ATCC 1789) and Candida albicans (ATCC 66027) were evaluated for their activity. Sabouraud agar [1% bacteriological peptone (Oxoid™ Catalog number: LP0037B), 2% D+glucose (108337 Millipore), and 2% bacteriological agar (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS: 9002-18-0)] and Sabouraud broth (1% bacteriological peptone and 2% glucose) were used for analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Photopolymer Resin Fabrication using Lignin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glycerin [99%, American Chemical Society (ACS) grade], methanol (>99%, ACS grade), dichloromethane (DCM; 99%), isopropanol (ACS grade), Irgacure TPO-L, and 5 wt% ruthenium on carbon (Ru/C; powder, reduced) were purchased from Fisher Scientific. Acryloyl chloride (96%) and vanillyl alcohol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Peopoly Moai model resin (green) was purchased from MatterHackers (Lake Forest, CA). All reagents were used as received. Technical lignins were provided by Natural Resources Canada–CanmetENERGY and used as received.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fabrication of Microneedle Arrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arrays of solid microneedles were fabricated by cutting needle structures from stainless steel sheets (SS 304, 75m thick; McMaster-Carr, Atlanta, GA, USA) using an infrared laser (Resonetics Maestro, Nashua, NH, USA). Initially, the shape and orientation of the arrays were drafted in a CAD file (AutoCAD; Autodesk, Cupertino, CA, USA), by using the lasercontrol software. The laser beam traced the desired shape of the needle, which ablated the metal sheet and created the needles in the plane of the sheet. The laser was operated at 1000
Hz at an energy density of 20 J/cm2 and required approximately 4 min to cut an array. The metal sheet with needles on it was cleaned in hot water (Alconox, White Plains, NY, USA)
and rinsed with DI water. Each needle was then manually bent at 90° out of the plane of the sheet. The needles were electropolished in a bath containing a 6:3:1 mixture by volume of glycerin, phosphoric acid, and water (Fisher Scientific, Atlanta, GA, USA) to remove debris (Graham 1971; Hensel, 2000) . This electropolishing process reduced the needle thickness to 50 m.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fabrication of Microneedle Arrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arrays of solid microneedles) were fabricated by cutting needle structures from stainless steel sheets (SS 304, 75 mm thick; McMaster-Carr, Atlanta, GA, USA) using an infrared laser (Reso-netics Maestro, Nashua, NH, USA). The fabricated arrays consisted of 50 needles per cm 2 and a needle tip radius of 10µm. Initially, the shape and orientation of the arrays were drafted in a CAD file (AutoCAD; Autodesk, Cupertino, CA, USA), by using the laser-control software. The laser beam traced the desired shape of the needle, which ablated the metal sheet and created the needles in the plane of the sheet. The laser was operated at 1000 Hz at an energy density of 20 J/cm2 and required approximately 4 min to cut an array. The metal sheet with needles on it was cleaned in hot water (Alconox, White Plains, NY, USA) and rinsed with DI water. Each needle was then manually bent at 90 0 out of the plane of the sheet. The needles were electropolished in a bath containing a 6:3:1 mixture by volume of glycerin, phosphoric acid, and water (Fisher Scientific, Atlanta, GA, USA) to remove debris. This electropolishing process reduced the needle thickness to 50 µm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PPSU-based Membrane Fabrication and Gas Permeation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyphenylsulfone (Radel® R-5000, PPSU, Mw = 50,000 g∙mol−1) was purchased from Solvay Advanced Polymer (Beveren, Belgium), N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP, 99%) and glycerin were purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium), silica nanoparticles (SN) were synthesized based on the Stöber method described in detail elsewhere [75 (link)]. CO2 (99.99 mol.%) and CH4 (99.999 mol.%) gases were provided by AGA (Linde group, Vilnius, Lithuania).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Functionalized PVA Hydrogel Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), pellets, (average molecular weight Mw = 12.4 × 104 g/mol, degree of hydrolysis DH = 99 ÷ 100%), and glycerin (99.6%) were purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Tert-butyl acrylate (t-BA), 98%, containing 10–20 ppm monomethyl ether hydroquinone as an inhibitor; divinylbenzene (DVB), technical grade 80%, stabilized with the inhibitor monomethyl ether hydroquinone; 3-(triethoxysilyl) propionitrile, 97% (TESPN); aluminum oxide (Al2O3); tetraethylorthosilicate, 99% (TEOS); N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, 99% (DCC); branched polyethyleneimine (average Mw~25,000 by LS, average Mn~10,000 by GPC); and anhydrous N,N-Dimethylformamide, 99.8% (DMF), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck, KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). All products containing inhibitors were first purified through an Al2O3 column prior to their usage.
Pure copper chloride (II) dihydrate p.a. (99.0% CuCl2∙2H2O) was bought from ChemPUR Feinchemikalien und Forschung GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany); hydrochloric acid (HCl), ≥37%, was purchased from Fluka (Honeywell Specialty Chemicals, Seelze, Germany); and ethanol absolute, 99.3% (EtOH), was bought from Chemical Company (Iasi, Romania). An ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) solution (28–30%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) EMSURE® ACS, Reag. Ph Eur. All aqueous solutions were prepared with freshly distilled water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Characterization of Antimicrobial-Resistant Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of eight COL-R A. baumannii and eight COL-R E. coli non-duplicate isolates were isolated from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University during 2012–2019. All isolates were cultured on a Columbia blood agar plate (BAP). Strains were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS, BioMerieux, France) and stored at −80℃ in Luria Bertani (LB) broth medium supplemented with 30% glycerin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Separation and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial cell pellets were adjusted to equal amounts by adding 1× SDS buffer consisting of 62.6 mM Tris–HCl, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.01% bromophenol blue, 5% glycerin and reducing agent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), while the supernatants were mixed with 4× SDS buffer. Prior to the separation by SDS–PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide gels, the protein samples were boiled for 10 min at 94°C (Moese et al., 2001 (link)). The separated proteins were then analyzed by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Bio-Rad, Munich/Germany). For Western Blotting, the proteins were blotted onto PVDF membranes (Immobilon-P, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt/Germany) and blocked in TBS-T buffer (pH 7.4, 0.2 M Tris, 1.4 M sodium chloride and 1% Tween-20) containing 5% milk powder for 1 h at room temperature or at 4°C overnight (Boehm et al., 2011 (link)). After addition of the primary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature, horseradish peroxidase-conjugates anti-rabbit polyvalent sheep immunoglobulin was applied as secondary antibody (Zhang et al., 2015 (link)). Antibody detection was performed using 1.41 mM luminol in 0.1 Tris–HCl (pH 6.8) supplemented with 0.61 mM p-coumaric acid solved in DMSO and 0.02% hydrogen peroxide. Unless otherwise indicated, all chemicals were obtained from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe/Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!