The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Clc bio

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Denmark, Germany, United States

CLC bio is a bioinformatics software platform developed by Qiagen. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for analyzing and visualizing biological data, including genome assembly, sequence alignment, and phylogenetic analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

29 protocols using clc bio

1

Analyzing BAC Gene Expression in Fungal Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The predicted BAC genes were analyzed with respect to their expression levels using RNA-Seq data obtained from previous work [16 (link)] in which the transcripts were obtained through fungal growth on three carbon sources: lactose (LAC), cellulose (CEL), and delignified sugarcane bagasse (DSB). The reads from the RNA-Seq library were mapped against BAC genes using CLC Genomics Workbench (CLC bio—v4.0; Finlandsgade, Dk) with the following parameters: mapping settings (minimum length fraction = 0.7, minimum similarity fraction = 0.8, and maximum number of hits for a read = 1) and paired settings (minimum distance = 180 and maximum distance = 1000, including the broken pairs counting scheme).
The expression values were expressed in RPKM (reads per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads). The predicted BAC genes were clustered with a K-means algorithm using CLC bio. The clustering was performed applying Euclidian distance as the distance metric in 10 partitions (k = 10) for the predicted genes for each BAC according to the cluster features of the log2-transformed expression values. K-means clustering for CAZy genes was performed with the same features, except for the number of partitions (k= 6). A hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted with CLC-bio using the single linkage method and Euclidian distance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Post-sequencing genomic analysis pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Post-sequencing genomic analyses were conducted using CLCbio and CLC Genomics Workbench version 8.5.1 (CLC Bio, Qiagen). Briefly, adaptor contamination removal and quality trimming (Phred score ≥ 20) was conducted. Reads were demultiplexed based on specific SISPA barcodes using J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI) custom software. Duplicate reads were omitted. Reads tagged with different barcodes but belonging to the same sample were combined for mapping. Reads were de novo assembled and contigs over 500nt in length were BLASTed to identify appropriate reference genome sequences available from public sequence databases. After selecting the most appropriate reference genome, reads were mapped and non-specific matches were ignored. Partial or complete FMDV genome sequences were obtained. When required, ORFs were finished using Sanger sequencing. For Sanger sequencing, RT-PCR products were generated using SuperScript®III One-Step RT-PCR System with Platinum® Taq High Fidelity (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), column purified, and sequenced using the di-deoxy termination method (Big dye terminator; (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Chromatograms were analyzed using Sequencher® v5.1 (GeneCodes) and a consensus sequence generated by NGS was updated to include the Sanger derived sequence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Small RNA Sequencing Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At least 15 million, 50 bp, SE reads were generated from each sample. Further downstream analysis of the sequenced reads from each sample was performed as per our unique in-house pipeline. Briefly, quality control checks on raw sequence data from each sample will be performed using FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics, London, UK). Raw reads were then imported on a commercial data analysis platform CLCbio (CLCbio, MA, USA). Adapter trimming was done to remove ligated adapter from 3′ end of the sequenced reads with only one mismatch allowed; poorly aligned 3′ ends were also trimmed. Sequences shorter than 15 nucleotides length were excluded from further analysis. Trimmed Reads were then used to extract and count the small RNA which were then annotated with microRNAs in miRBase release 18 database. Samples were grouped as per their types identifiers and quantification of miRNA abundance was done. Differential expression of miRNA was calculated on the basis of their fold change (default cut-off ≥±2.0) between mapped counts observed between individual groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

De Novo Genome Assembly with Long Reads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The user needs to create a draft assembly using a de novo assembly method of choice (e.g. Velvet [1 (link)], SOAPdenovo [2 (link)], Ray [18 (link)], CLCbio (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) or Newbler (Roche)). Optionally the user may also provide scaffold sequences generated with dedicated software (e.g. SSPACE [5 (link)] or SOPRA [4 (link)]). The resulting contigs or scaffolds (in FASTA format) are to be provided as input to SSPACE-LongRead software together with a set of long reads in FASTQ or FASTA format (e.g. PacBio CLR reads). Note that in our study we observe that SSPACE-LongRead obtains the best results if the draft assembly is constructed with CLCbio or Newbler as these tend to better split contigs at repeat boundaries (see the Results and Discussion section for additional explanations).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fungal Genome Sequencing and Annotation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CBS 203.75 was sequenced using Illumina technology by the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) and assembled using the standard JGI pipeline for draft fungal sequences (e.g. [10 (link)]). CBS 663.74 and SBP.F1.2.11 were also sequenced using Illumina technology, but assembly and annotation were performed in-house using ClcBio (CLC Genomics Workbench, Denmark) and Augustus v3.0.2 [35 (link)], respectively. The CAZy enzymes [36 (link)] were identified using blastp (e-value <1 × 10−40) against the database of Myceliophthora thermophila [10 (link)] (Additional file 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In Silico Discovery of Mycoviral Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA-Seq raw reads from nine avcr2 isolates and a negative control (healthy P. monticola stems without C. ribicola infection) from previous studies [29 (link), 31 ] were used for in silico discovery of mycoviral sequences (Table 1). These RNA-Seq raw reads are accessible in GenBank under SRA numbers SRR1574690-SRR15774692, SRR1583540, SRR1583545, SRR1583552, SRR15835557-SRR1583559, and SRR3273235-SRR3273237. After trimming of adaptor and low-quality sequences, deep mRNA sequencing reads were de novo assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench version 5.5 with graph parameters of automatic word size and automatic bubble size (CLC bio, QIAgen, Aarhus, Denmark). Putative viral sequences were identified from the C. ribicola transcriptomes by BLASTx analysis against a data set of the Viral RefSeq (viral.1.protein.faa.gz) downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). Possible overlapping contigs from different fungal isolates were re-assembled into longer consensus sequences using the CAP3 program with default settings [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Wound Microbiome Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reads in FASTQ format were imported to CLC genomics workbench version 8.5.1 using the microbial genome finishing module (CLC bio; Qiagen, Aarhus, Denmark), for sequence quality control and analysis. Workflows for sequence quality control and operational taxonomic units (OTUs) clustering were based on previously reported wound microbiome analysis.16 (link) OTUs were defined as molecular proxies for describing organisms based on their phylogenetic relationships to other organisms, and were reported at either the genera or species level identification where possible.
Briefly, after sequence and quality control measures, reads were assigned to OTUs using SILVA17 (link) at 99% similarity at the genus level and species level where possible. OTUs were aligned using MUSCLE18 (link) to reconstruct a phylogenetic tree, allowing the estimation of the alpha diversity pre- and post-treatment for each DFU. This included both community richness (rarefaction) and community diversity (Shannon–Weaver Index). Rarefaction curves allow the estimation of the number of unique microbial taxa within a sample and the Shannon–Weaver Index is a measure of diversity that includes the number of unique microbial taxa and their relative evenness within each sample. Thus, a higher Shannon–Weaver Index correlates to a greater diversity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phylogenetic Analysis of HIV Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequences were manually edited using combination of CLC BIO (QIAGEN®, USA), MEGA 6.06 [38 (link)] and sequence scanner v1.0 (Applied Biosystems, USA) software. The sequences were aligned by ClustalW with reference sequences from HIV Sequence Database at Los Alamos (www.hiv.lanl.gov). Phylogenetic inferences were performed by the neighbour-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates under Kimura's two-parameter correction using MEGA 6.06. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site [39 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Conopeptide Sequencing and Mass Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated Lo6/7a, Lo6/7b, Asi3a, Asi14a and AusB were collected and freeze-dried for direct peptide sequencing and molecular mass analysis (MALDI-TOF; 4800 Analyzer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). A Protein Sequencer PPSQ-31A/33A (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to determine the amino acid sequence of the separated compounds. Samples were loaded onto a polybrene-pretreated, precycled glass fiber disk and Edman sequenced for 30 residue cycles.
Theoretically-calculated masses of the peptides were done with an online Peptide Mass Calculator (Peptide Protein Research Ltd., Hampshire, UK). Peptide homology search was generated online at Conoserver.org [50 (link),51 (link)] and NCBI (Rockville Pike, Bethesda MD, USA) [52 ]. The CLC Main Workbench 7 software was used to align the peptide sequences (CLC bio, QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bioinformatic Analysis with CLC GWB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
If not stated otherwise, all bioinformatic analyses steps were performed using CLC Genomics Workbench (CLC GWB; v7.0.4; CLC bio, a QIAGEN Company, Aarhus, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!