The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Saturn ccd area detector

Manufactured by Rigaku

The Saturn CCD area detector is a high-performance X-ray detector designed for a variety of applications in crystallography and materials analysis. It features a large active area and high quantum efficiency, enabling the collection of high-quality data from small or weakly diffracting samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

4 protocols using saturn ccd area detector

1

Single-Crystal X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements
were made on a Rigaku Saturn CCD area detector with graphite monochromated
Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 123 K. Data were
collected and processed using CrystalClear (Rigaku).52 The structures were solved by direct methods53 (link) and expanded using Fourier techniques.54 The nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically.
Hydrogen atoms were refined using the riding model. All calculations
were performed using the CrystalStructure55 crystallographic software package except for refinement, which was
performed using SHELXL-97.56 Crystallographic
data of 1F and 2F are given in Table 1; more details about
single-crystal measurements are available in the Supporting Information
(SI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Structural Analysis of 3TfAPI Crystal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A needle-shaped single crystal of 3TfAPI, obtained by recrystallization from cyclohexane, was mounted on a fiber loop. Diffraction experiments were performed using a Rigaku Saturn CCD area detector with graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). Intensity data (6° < 2θ < 55°) were corrected for Lorentz-polarization effects and absorption. The structure solution and refinements were carried out using the CrystalStructure (2000–2018) program package (Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The heavy-atom positions were determined by a direct method program (SIR92) and the remaining non-hydrogen atoms were found by subsequent Fourier syntheses and refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques against F2 using the SHELXL-2014/7 program [51 (link)]. The position of the NH hydrogen atom was refined, whereas the remaining hydrogen atoms were included in the refinements using a riding model. Crystal data: C16H15N2O3F3, M = 340.30, triclinic, a = 5.1357(13), b = 10.360(3), c = 14.088(4) Å, α = 84.565(7), β = 82.974(9), γ = 89.991(9)°, U = 740.5(3) Å3, T = 93 K, space group P 1¯ (no. 2), Z = 2 reflections measured, 9064 unique (Rint = 0.0584), which were used in all calculations. The final wR(F2) was 0.1007 (for all data points). CCDC 2102046 contains supplementary crystallographic data for this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

X-Ray Crystallography of Compound 1a

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Upon crystallization from MeOH/H2O (10 : 1) using the vapor diffusion method, colorless crystals were obtained for 1a, and a crystal (0.90 × 0.27 × 0.08 mm3) was separated from the sample and mounted on a glass fiber, and data were collected using a Rigaku Saturn CCD area detector with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Ǻ at 173(2) K. Crystal data: C26H33F3O6·H2O, M = 516.54, space group orthorhombic, P212121; unit cell dimensions a = 6.9639 (14) Å, b = 17.211 (3) Å, c = 21.948 (5) Å, V = 2630.5 (9) Å3, Z = 4, Dcalcd = 1.304 mg/m3,μ = 0.107 mm−1, F(000) = 1096. The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXL-2016 [19 ] and refined using full-matrix least-squares difference Fourier techniques. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters, and all hydrogen atoms were placed in idealized positions and refined as riding atoms with the relative isotropic parameters. Absorption corrections were applied with the Siemens Area Detector Absorption Program (SADABS) [20 ]. The 14274 measurements yielded 4799 independent reflections after equivalent data were averaged, and Lorentz and polarization corrections were applied. The final refinement gave R1 = 0.0811 and wR2 = 0.1232 [I > 2σ(I)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synthesis and Characterization of Compound 2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yield: 78%. m.p. 165.5–167.3°C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.35–8.27 (m, 2 H), 7.88 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.28 (dd, J = 10.2, 3.1 Hz, 3 H), 7.19 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 6.40 (s, 1 H), 2.46 (s, 3 H) (supplementary material). Elemental analysis: Calc. for C16H11NO5: C, 64.65; H, 3.73; N, 4.71. Found: C, 64.82; H, 3.74; N, 4.70. MS-HRMS (m/z): 320.0533 (M + Na)+ (supplementary material). IR: C-O-C (Diphenyl oxide Phenyl ether Biphenyloxide): 1267 cm-1 (supplementary material).
A light yellow crystal of compound 2 with dimensions of 0.45 nm × 0.32 nm × 0.23 nm was mounted on a glass fiber. X-ray single-crystal diffraction data was collected on a Rigaku saturn CCD area detector at 293 K with Mo-Ka radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The structure was solved by direct methods and refined on F2 by full-matrix least squares methods with SHELXL-9748 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!