The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

C18 macro spincolumns

Manufactured by Harvard Apparatus
Sourced in United States

The C18 Macro SpinColumns are solid-phase extraction (SPE) columns designed for the purification and concentration of analytes from complex samples. These columns are packed with C18 bonded silica, a commonly used sorbent material for reversed-phase chromatography. The C18 Macro SpinColumns provide a simple and efficient way to perform sample cleanup and analyte enrichment prior to analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using c18 macro spincolumns

1

Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HSA, Hb, triethyl ammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP), iodoacetamide, α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and HPLC grade acetonitrile (ACN) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, MO). Busulfan, sulfolane, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and methanol were obtained from Fluka Chemika. Urea and ammonium phosphate were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), HPLC grade formic acid (FA) from Biosolve Chemical (Valkenswaard, The Nederlands), HPLC grade water from Romil (Cambridge, UK), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) Gibco from Life Technologies (Zug, Switzerland), and butyl methanesulfonate (BMS) from Ark Pharm, Inc. (Illinois, USA). C18 macro-spin columns were purchased from Harvard apparatus (Holliston, MA, USA), ZipTip C18 tips and ultrafiltration Millipore AMICON 0.5 (cut-off 3 kDa) from Merck-Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA), and sequencing grade modified trypsin from Promega. The peptide AQYLQQCPFEDHVK was synthetized by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Ulm, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Quantification and TMT Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein concentration of samples was determined (BCA Protein Assay) and used to normalize the volume corresponding to the protein quantity necessary for tandem mass tag labeling (100 μg). Final concentration of 50 mM tris (2‐carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP), 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate pH 8.0 in 10% 2,2,2‐trifluoroethanol (TFE) was added to protein lysates and heated at 55°C for 30 min. Cysteines were then alkylated in 10 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma), and excess reagent was quenched with 10 mM dithiothreitol (Sigma) and digested overnight at 37°C by adding porcine trypsin (1:50, w/w) (Pierce). Peptides were desalted via C18 Macro SpinColumns (Harvard Apparatus) and dried under vacuum centrifugation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hydrophilic Strong Anion Exchange Fractionation of TMT-Labeled Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMT‐labeled peptides were subjected to hydrophilic Strong Anion Exchange (hSAX) fractionation (Ritorto et al, 2013). Labeled peptides were solubilized in 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 10.0 and separated on a Dionex RFIC IonPac AS24 column (IonPac series, 2 × 250 mm, 2,000 Å pore size; Thermo Scientific). Using a DGP‐3600BM pump system equipped with a SRD‐3600 degasser (Thermo Scientific) a 30 min gradient length from 8 to 80% of 1 M NaCl in 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 10 (flow rate of 0.25 ml/min), separated the peptide mixtures into a total of 34 fractions. The 34 fractions were merged into 15 samples, acidified with 1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA; pH ~2), desalted via C18 Macro SpinColumns (Harvard Apparatus), dried under vacuum centrifugation and resuspended in 2% acetonitrile (ACN)/0.1% TFA for LC‐MS/MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples previously purified with C18 Macro Spin Columns (Harvard Apparatus) were fractionated using off-gel electrophoresis (OGE) separation using an Agilent 3100 off-gel fractionator as previously described [66 (link)]. Samples were then desalted and purified using MicroSpins C18 columns, dried in a speed-vacuum and stored at −20 °C until analysis. An LTQ Orbitrap Q-exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with nano-HPLC was used to analyzed the OGE fractions [42 (link)]. Peptides were reconstituted using 5% ACN and 0.1% FA; were trapped on a 2 cm × 75 µm ID, 3 µm pre-column; and separated on a 50 cm × 75 µm ID, PepMap C18, 2 µm easy-spray column (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The analytical separation was run for 60 min using a gradient of H2O/FA (99.9%/0.1%; solvent A) and CH3CN/FA (99.9%/0.1%; solvent B) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. For MS survey scans, the OT resolution, the ion population, the number of precursor ions and the collision energy used have been previously described [39 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After protein quantification, 100 µg of each sample were aliquoted and the urea was diluted 3-fold with 50 mM HEPES, pH 8.2 (brought <2M). Samples were reduced with 10 mM dithiothreitol at 42°C for 30 minutes on a ThermoMixer with agitation (500 rpm), alkylated with 15 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 20 minutes on a ThermoMixer with agitation (500 rpm), and trypsin-digested (Sequence Grade Modified; Promega) with a 1:100 trypsin:protein ratio at 37°C for 20 hours. Following the digest, all peptide samples were C18-purified using C18 MacroSpin Columns (Harvard Apparatus, Cat. #74–4101) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Eluted purified peptides were dried with a vacuum centrifuge and stored at −20°C until TMT labeling was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phosphorylated Peptide Fractionation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMT‐labelled phosphorylated peptides were combined at equal amounts for each channel and subjected to HPRP. Labelled peptides were solubilized in 20 mM ammonium formate (pH 8.0) and separated on a Gemini C18 column (250 × 3 mm, 3 μm C18 110 Å pore size; Phenomenex). Using a DGP‐3600BM pump system equipped with a SRD‐3600 degasser (Thermo Fisher), a 40 min gradient from 1 to 90% acetonitrile (flow rate of 0.25 ml/min) separated the peptide mixtures into a total of 40 fractions. The 40 fractions were merged into 12 samples, acidified with 1% (v/v) TFA (pH ~ 2), desalted via C18 Macro SpinColumns (Harvard Apparatus), dried under vacuum centrifugation and resuspended in 2% (v/v) ACN/0.1% (v/v) TFA for LC‐MS/MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phosphopeptide Enrichment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phosphopeptide enrichment was similar to previously described (Larsen et al, 2005; Trost et al, 2009, 2012; Lai et al, 2015). Tryptic peptides (5 mg per TMT channel) were resuspended in 1 ml of 2 M lactic acid/50% (v/v) acetonitrile and centrifuged 15,000 × g for 20 min. Supernatants were placed in an Eppendorf LoBind Tube containing 24 mg of titanium dioxide beads (GL Sciences) and vortexed for 1 h at room temperature. Beads were washed twice with 2 M lactic acid/50% (v/v) acetonitrile and once with 0.1% (v/v) TFA in 50% (v/v) acetonitrile. Phosphopeptides were eluted twice with 150 μl of 60 mM ammonium hydroxide (pH > 10.5), then acidified with 40 μl of 20% (v/v) formic acid and desalted via C18 Macro SpinColumns (Harvard Apparatus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fungal Chitin and Glucosamine Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A. niger fungi were obtained from domestic cat hair samples and cultured on an agar medium. D-Glucosamine hydrochloride was obtained from MP Biomedicals (Santa Ana, CA). Chitin polymer (100% acetylated) and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (> 98.0%) were obtained from TCI (Portland, OR). Chitin polymer (20–30% deacetylated) was obtained from Alfa Aesar. ACS-grade acetone and Optima LC-MS grade formic acid were obtained from Fisher Chemical (Waltham, MA). Hydrochloric acid was obtained from Ward’s Science (Rochester, NY). LC-MS grade water, LC-MS grade acetonitrile, low molecular weight chitosan (96% deacetylated), and ammonium acetate (> 98.0%) were obtained were obtained from EMD Millipore (Burlington, MA). 0.2-μm Captiva Econofilters were obtained from Agilent (Palo Alto, CA). C18 Macro spin columns were obtained from Harvard Apparatus (Holliston, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Immunoprecipitation and Tryptic Digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples (40 mg) were resuspended in 800 μL of lysis buffer (0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Igepal in PBS pH 7.4, and protease inhibitor (Roche)), the internal standard was added and the samples were homogenized with a tissue lyser (TissueLyser II, QIAGEN) for 30 min at 30 Hz. After homogenization, lysates were put on rotation at 4°C for 2 h, centrifuged at 21,000 g for 30 min. The supernatants were recovered and incubated with previously blocked protein A magnetic beads (Merck) for 2 h in rotation at 4°C. Beads were recovered and washed with lysis buffer, buffer A (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris in water, pH 7.5) and buffer B (400 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris in water, pH 7.5). Proteins were eluted with glycine (0.1 M, pH 3) and incubated shaking for 30 min. Cysteines were reduced and carbamylated with TCEP·HCl and IAA respectively. Proteins were finally digested overnight with trypsin at 37°C. Tryptic peptides were purified on C18 Macrospin columns (Harvard Apparatus) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and eluates were dried at room temperature with a vacuum centrifuge (Eppendorf). Dried samples were finally resuspended in a solution of 3% MeCN and 0.1% FA (25 μL). Samples (6 µL) were then injected in the nanoLC-MS system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Hemoglobin Preparation and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hemoglobin solutions were prepared from 20 μL of EDTA blood samples as previously described [13] . Hemoglobin extracts were stored at -80 °C until analysis. Hemoglobin concentration was determined using a commercial colorimetric assay (Randox Haemoglobin; Randox Laboratories Ltd., UK). All hemoglobin solutions were then diluted to a concentration of 1 pmol/μL. A desalting step was performed using C 18 macro spin columns (Harvard Apparatus, Harvard, MA, USA). Briefly, hemoglobin was bound to the spin column with 5 % acetonitrile and 0.1 % formic acid. After washing with the same solution, Hb was eluted with 50 % acetonitrile and 0.1 % formic acid. Samples were then evaporated in a vacuum centrifuged and stored at -80 °C. For MS experiments, hemoglobin samples were dissolved in 50 % acetonitrile and 0.1 % formic acid to a concentration of 1 pmol/μL. Ubiquitin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in 50 % acetonitrile and 0.1 % formic acid to a concentration of 1 pmol/ μL. This solution was used for internal recalibration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!