The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism v 2

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

GraphPad Prism V. 2.0 is a data analysis and graphing software. It provides tools for managing, analyzing, and visualizing scientific data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using prism v 2

1

Breast Cancer Patient Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experimental data were processed using Microsoft® Excel 2007 software and expressed as mean ± SEM. The coefficient of variation (CV) was expressed as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean.
Statistical analysis was performed using two-tail unpaired Student’s t test at 95 % confidence interval (GraphPad Prism v.2.0) for comparison between the two groups of breast cancer patients. All results were considered significant at p values of less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spore Germination Analysis by ANOVA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were first tested for normality and then subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Sources of variation were time of storage and treatments. Significant differences between mean values were determined using Duncan's multiple range test (P = 0.05) following one-way ANOVA. Significant differences on percentage values (spore germination) were logarithmic transformed prior using ANOVA. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) and graphs were produced using Prism v.2.0 (Graph Pad Inc., San Diego, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Neuronal Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Unpaired Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment was performed when appropriate to compare experimental groups. A statistically significant difference was considered when p was ≤0.05. Data processing and statistical tests were carried out with GraphPad Prism V. 2.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data generated was statistically evaluated by Student’s t-test and 2-way ANOVA using the statistical analyses package of GraphPad prism (V2.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Affinity Determination of Anti-HER2 Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the affinity of conjugated Aff-QD probes, HCC1954 cells (2 ×105 cells) were incubated with increasing concentrations (0 to 40 nM) of either AffantiHER2-QD605 and Affneg-QD545 probes. MCF-7 cells were used as a negative control, to determine the HER2 specificity or non-specificity of both probes. After 1 h of incubation at 4 °C, cells were washed three times and resuspended in PBS, propidium iodide was added to exclude death cells, and suspensions were analyzed in a BD FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences, CA, USA). For data acquisition and analysis, we used the software FACSDiva (BD Biosciences, CA, USA) and FlowJo (Tree Star Inc., OR, USA), respectively. The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) was plotted as a function of probe concentration, and the dissociation constant (Kd) of AffantiHER2-QD605 was calculated with a one-specific binding equation using GraphPad Prism V. 2.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA) [27] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Dopamine D1 Receptor Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Binding assays were carried out by using plasma membranes (12 μg/well)
expressing human dopamine D1R (Perkin Elmer). Membranes
were incubated in a Multiscreen FC 96-well plate (Millipore) with
0.7 nM [3H]SCH23390 (Perkin Elmer) and increasing concentrations
of the test compound in assay buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 5 mM
MgCl2; pH 7.4) for 1 h at 27 °C. After this time,
the well content was filtered through a Millipore manifold and membranes
were washed four times with assay buffer. The plate was dried and
radioactivity was measured in a Microbeta Trilux liquid scintillation
reader (Perkin Elmer). Non-specific binding was determined in the
presence of 1 μM (+)-butaclamol. Data were normalized to the
percentage of specific binding and fitted to a 4-parameter logistic
equation using with Prism v2.1 software (GraphPad Inc). For the calculation
of the affinity ratio of DA in the presence of the allosteric modulators,
data were fitted according to the equations reported by Lazareno and
Birdsall.44
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dopamine Receptor Functional Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Functional studies at human D1 and D2 receptors were carried out in endogenously expressed human D1R in the SK-N-MC cell line (ATCC), and recombinant human D2R stably transfected in an in-house CHO cell line. Cells were
thawed and seeded into a black 96-well plate (1 × 104 cells/well for SK-N-MC cell line, 5 × 103 cells/well
for CHO cell line) in Opti-MEM containing 500 μM IBMX (3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine).
Test compounds were added to the cells and incubated for 15 min at
25 °C for D1R, and for 5 min at 37 °C for D2R. After this time, dopamine was added to the corresponding
wells and incubated for additional 15 min at 25 °C for D1R, and 10 min at 37 °C for D2R. Next, treated
cells were lysed (for the D2R assay, cells were previously
treated with 10 μM forskolin for 5 min at 37 °C) and the
cAMP concentration was measured by HTRF, using a kit from Cisbio.
HTRF was read in a Tecan M1000 Genius Pro readerexcitation = 320 nm, λemission = 620 and 665 nm, 30 flashes),
and data were normalized to the dopamine maximum effect and fitted
to a 4-parameter logistic equation by using Prism v2.1 software (GraphPad
Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Radioligand Binding Assay for 5-HT 2C R

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were normalized to 5-HT maximum effect and non-linear regression fitting was performed by using Prism v2.1 (GraphPad software).
Radioligand binding assays at 5-HT 2C R. Competition radioligand binding assays were carried out by using four different radioligands:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!