The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using diaminobenzidine colorimetric reagent solution

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Xenograft Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The xenograft tumor slides were incubated with the following primary antibodies: phospho-AMPK (Thr172) (1:100), phospho-ACC (Ser79) (1:100) (Cell Signaling Technology, USA). Anti-rabbit peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and diaminobenzidine colorimetric reagent solution purchased from Dako (Carpinteria, CA) was used. The staining process were according to standard methods. Assessment of the staining was performed using the Image-scop software (Media Cybernetics, Inc.) according to the staining intensities and the percentage of positively stained cells, as described [53 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Xenograft Tumor Evaluation in BALB/cA nu/nu Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six-week-old female BALB/cA nu/nu mice were purchased from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Company (Beijing, China) and maintained in an Animal Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory at the Animal Experimental Center of Wuhan University. All animal experiments were performed according to the Wuhan University Animal Care Facility and National Institutes of Health guidelines. Approximately 3 × 106 SGC7901 cells and 1 × 106 HELFFAP cells (Group I, n = 5), 3 × 106 SGC7901 cells and 1 × 106 HELFNC cells (Group II, n = 5) were harvested and suspended in 200 ml of PBS and Matrigel (BD Bio-science, USA) (1:1) and injected subcutaneously into the right flank of each mouse. The size of subcutaneous tumors was recorded every two days. Five weeks later, mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were removed. The weight of tumors was recorded and statistically analyzed. The xenograft tumor slides were incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-CD31 was purchased from ABclonal (Boston, USA) and anti-Ki67 from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, USA). Anti-rabbit or anti-mouse peroxidaseconjugated secondary antibody (ABclonal, Boston, USA) and diaminobenzidine colorimetric reagent solution (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) were used. The staining processes were performed according to standard methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CD31 Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For IHC analysis, the slides of tumors, Matrigel plugs, livers, and lungs were incubated with CD31 primary antibodies, which was followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA). Finally, the staining processes were performed with diaminobenzidine colorimetric reagent solution (Dako, USA) and hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Images were taken to evaluate CD31 expression using Pro Plus software. For immunofluorescence observation, HUVECs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 30 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100. Staining was performed with primary antibodies mentioned above, which was followed by incubation with Cy3-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG. Hoechst was used to label the cell nucleus. All samples were observed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Immunohistochemistry and in situ Hybridization Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry, the slides were incubated with primary antibodies referred above, which was followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Finally, the staining processes were performed with diaminobenzidine colorimetric reagent solution (Dako, Carpinteria, USA) and hematoxylin (Sigma Chemical Co., USA). For in situ hybridization analysis, hsa-miR-1247-3p miRCURY LNA detection probe (Exiqon, Denmark) was used and the total staining processes were carried out according to manufacturer’s protocols described before47 (link). Images were captured with Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo (Aperio, USA) and assessed with image-scop software (Media Cybernetics, Inc.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Staining of Xenograft Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The xenograft tumor slides were incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-CD31 was purchased from ABclonal and anti-Ki67 from Cell Signaling Technology (USA). Anti-rabbit or anti-mouse peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (ABclonal) and diaminobenzidine colorimetric reagent solution purchased from Dako (Carpinteria, CA) were used. The staining processes were according to standard methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ASPP2, HMGCR, and HMGCS1 Expression in Primary Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expressions of ASPP2, HMGCR, and HMGCS1 were analyzed with ImageScope system in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of primary tumors. Briefly, the slides were dewaxed, hydrated,quenched endogenous peroxidase activity, retrieved antigen, blocked and incubated with the antibody against ASPP2 (1:50, A4480, Sigma-Aldrich), HMGCR (1:50, H300 sc-33827, Santa Cruz), or HMGCS1 (1:50, H-70 sc-33829, Santa Cruz) overnight at 4 °C. Then, sections were rinsed and incubated with the working solution of horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit for 1 h at 37 °C. After rinse for three times, diaminobenzidine colorimetric reagent solution from Dako (Carpinteria, CA) was used. Subsequently the slides were counterstained by hematoxylin and dehydrated in graded alcohol and mounted. The expression of ASPP2 and HMGCR were scored according to the signal intensity and distribution. Evaluation of immunostaining was independently performed by two experienced pathologists.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry, the slides were incubated with above-mentioned primary antibodies, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Finally, the staining processes were performed with diaminobenzidine colorimetric reagent solution (Dako, Carpinteria, USA) and hematoxylin (Sigma Chemical Co., USA). For in situ hybridization analysis, hsa-miRNA-21 miRCURY LNA detection probe (Exiqon, Denmark) was used, and the total staining processes were carried out according to manufacturer’s protocols. Images were captured with Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo (Aperio, USA) and assessed with image-scop software (Media Cybernetics, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cancer Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin fixed and paraffin-embedded sections (4 μm) were subjected to immunohistochemical staining. The slides were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies, including rabbit anti-AHRR (1:100, ab108518, Abcam), rabbit anti-PTPRD(1:100, LS-B9625, LifeSpan Biosciences), rabbit anti-NRG3(1:200, ab83704, Abcam) and mouse anti-UNC5D (1:100, ab58141, Abcam). Anti-rabbit or anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were applied. Finally, diaminobenzidine colorimetric reagent solution from Dako (Carpinteria, CA) was used and followed by hematoxylin counterstaining (Sigma Chemical Co). Tissue slides were scanned with an Aperio ScanScope GL, and the Aperio ImageScope software (Aperio Technologies, Vista,CA) was used to assess the scanned images based on the percentage of positively stained cells and staining intensity. Expression levels of these proteins in all clinical samples were quantified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!