The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

234 protocols using em ace600

1

Freeze-Etching for Cryogenic Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As reported in previous work15 (link), a solution droplet was dipped with a micro pipette on a precooled tungsten post, which is located within a liquid nitrogen bath to create droplets on top (60–250 µm). Subsequently, the sample holder is transferred as fast as possible into the cooled body of the modified transfer shuttle VCT500 from Leica (T =  − 184 °C) and pumped to a pressure of 6 × 10−1 mbar. Shortly thereafter, the shuttle is attached to the high vacuum-coater (Leica EM ACE600), to carry out a freeze-etching process to remove ice crystals that were formed by the contact of the sample with air. By heating up the sample very precisely to a temperature of – 90 °C and a pressure of 9 × 10−7 mbar for 30 min, a sublimation process from solid ice to vapor occurs, which is necessary for the controlled removal of condensed ice from the sample. In addition, the Leica EM ACE600 high vacuum coater is useful to improve the vacuum condition inside the shuttle (10−4 mbar), which is necessary to enable the transfer of the sample into the Focused-Ion-Beam (FIB) Microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

High-resolution SEM Imaging of Mouse Lymph Nodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Terminally ketamine/xylazine/acepromazine-anesthetized mice were transcardially perfused with PB (0.1 M, pH 7.4) and subsequently fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde (Science Services) in PB (0.1 M, pH 7.4). LN samples were then dissected and post-fixed in the same buffer for another hour at RT. They were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series of 50%, 70%, 90%, 96% and 100% in H2O for a minimum of 10 min per step and subsequently kept overnight in fresh 100% ethanol at 4 °C. Once in 100% ethanol, samples were dried with a critical point dryer (EM-CPD300, Leica Microsystems), cut in half and coated with a 4-nm layer of platinum using a sputter coater (EM-ACE600, Leica Microsystems). The samples were imaged with a field emission SEM Merlin compact VP (Carl Zeiss) at 3 kV. The signal was detected by an Everhart–Thornley secondary electron detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Cyanobacterial Nanovesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CDNVs were fixed in 2%
paraformaldehyde for 45 min and then rinsed with 1× PBS in triplicate.
CDNVs were then serially dehydrated in 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100%
(200 proof) ethanol for 10 min and resuspended in 200 proof ethanol.
Suspended CDNVs were briefly sonicated, and then a droplet of the
sample was pipetted and deposited onto silicon wafer. The surface
of the sample was then metallized by sputter-coating 5 nm platinum
(EM ACE 600, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) to enhance surface
electrical conductivity. CDNVs were subsequently imaged using field-emission
scanning electron microscopy (feSEM, Helios Nanolab 660, Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Morphology and Adhesion Analysis of Prepared Bilayers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scanning electron microscope MIRA3 (TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) was used to study the morphology and adhesion of the prepared bilayers. Images were taken in a secondary electron emission mode, the scan mode was DEPTH, the beam density was 10 and the high voltage was 10 kV. The working distance was set to 15 mm. The surface of the samples was coated with a 20 nm thin layer of Au/Pd using EM ACE 600 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The pore size was characterized from SEM images using ImageJ software and SEM Image Pore Extractor (SEMIPE). A minimum of five and a maximum of ten images with the same resolution were taken from each sample. From each image, 40–90 pores were measured. Data were evaluated using a 2-sample T-test, which assumes unequal variances and unequal sample sizes. The level of significance was set at *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01and ***p < 0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sample Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A sample stub was covered with sticky
carbon tape, and the cut sample was attached on it. The sample was
coated with a 7.5 nm thick gold layer using a high vacuum sputter
coater (EM ACE600, Leica Microsystems, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Leptospira Biofilm Formation and Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leptospira strains were cultured as described in the biofilm formation section with minor modifications. Inoculation was performed by adding one mL of diluted culture in a 24-well plate (flat bottom, with low evaporation lid, Corning) each well containing a sterile 12 mm Glass coverslips (12 × 12 mm, Menzel-Glaser, Braunschweig, Germany). The supernatant was removed and biofilm was rinsed once in PBS, then fixed in 4% PFA / 1% glutaraldehyde for 15 min. Coverslips were rinsed again in PBS and stained with 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4 in PBS, Acros Organics) for 1 h. After staining, samples were dehydrated through a series of ethanol concentrations (25, 50, 70, 90, and 100% for 10 min each) before being desiccated using hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS, Acros Organics). HMDS drying is a reliable alternative to critical point drying in the preparation of the samples with no differences in term of distortion and shrinkage between the two methods regarding cellular ultrastructure54 (link). Before visualization, samples were submitted to carbon sputtering to increase their electrical conductance (Em ACE600, Carbon Coater, Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany) and examined under a Jeol JSM IT-300 IntouchScope microscope (SED detector, 10 kV, Jeol LTD, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Preparation of SEM Samples for Protein-Coated Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed overnight at 4 °C in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer on 0.2 µg/ml HEL coated on glass and 100 µg/ml HEL coated on PAA gel. They were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions, then dried by the CO2 critical-point method, with an EM CPD300 (Leica microsystems). Samples were mounted on an aluminum stub with silver lacquer and sputter-coated with a 5 nm layer of platinum, with an EM ACE600 (Leica Microsystems). Images were acquired with a GeminiSEM 500 (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive SEM Characterization of Freestanding Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of both sides and cross-sectional view of the freestanding films, and also the element composition of the films and BGNPs, was assessed using the SEM JSM-6010 LV (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) coupled with EDS (INCAx-Act, PentaFET Precision, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK). For the observation of the cross-section, the films were fractured using nitrogen. Cross-Sectional SEM views were obtained from the LbL films before and after cross-linking with genipin, and the correspondent film thickness was estimated using the software ImageJ. The surface morphology of the BGNPs was characterized by a high-resolution field emission SEM with focused ion beam (AURIGA Compact FIB-SEM, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Before each analysis, except for EDS, the samples were sputtered with a gold layer, using a sputter coater EM ACE600 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The specific surface area of the BGNPs was measured by determining the N2-gas adsorption isotherms using a TriStar II 3020 surface area and porosity analyzer (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA). The samples were degassed at 130 °C overnight before measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Staphylococcal Biofilm Preparation and Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biofilms were cultured in the analogical manner as described in Section 4.2, with such a difference that the polystyrene coupons were placed in the bottom of the 24-well plate and served as the surface for staphylococcal biofilm growth. Next, the samples were gently cleansed in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstad, Germany) buffer; fixed in glutaraldehyde [28 (link)] (POCH, Wroclaw, Poland) and dried in a critical point dryer EM CPD300 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Subsequently, the samples were subjected to sputtering with Au/Pd (60:40) using EM ACE600, Leica sputter (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The sputtered samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Auriga 60, Zeiss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

S. aureus Biofilm Visualization by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The S. aureus ATCC 6538 and R1 biofilm strains were visualized with a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM, Auriga 60, ZEISS, Germany). Firstly, 1 mL of 2% (w/v) Bacteriological Lab Agar was poured into a 24-well plate and left for solidification. Next, 500 µL of the appropriate medium (TSB or IVWM) was poured into the wells with agar, and the plate was kept refrigerated for 24 h in order to soak the agar surface with the medium. After this time, the medium was removed from above the agar.
Subsequently, the bacterial suspensions were prepared in saline and adjusted to 0.5 MF (McFarland, 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL (Colony-Forming Unit)) using a densitometer and diluted thousand times in TSB or IVWM. The suspensions were added in the amount of 500 µL to the agar wells. The plate was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C under static conditions. The medium was then removed, and 500 µL of 4.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde was poured. The biofilms were visualised according to the methodology presented in our previous study49 (link). Drying of the samples was performed with a critical point dryer EM CPD300 (Leica Microsystems, Germany). Next, with the use of EM ACE600, Leica sputter (Leica Microsystems, Germany), the samples were sputtered with Au/Pd (60:40). They were then analyzed with a Scanning Electron Microscope49 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!