The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Orbscan iiz

Manufactured by Bausch & Lomb
Sourced in United States

The Orbscan IIz is a diagnostic device designed for ophthalmic examinations. It utilizes slit-scan technology to capture high-resolution images of the anterior segment of the eye, including the cornea. The device provides objective measurements and data that can assist eye care professionals in assessing corneal health and shape.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using orbscan iiz

1

Implantable Collamer Lens Sizing and Selection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We determined the ICL size (12.1, 12.6, 13.2, and 13.7 mm), mainly based on the manufacturer's nomogram, using white-to-white distance, and the ACD using a scanning-slit light corneal tomographer (Orbscan,IIz, Bausch&Lomb, Rochester, USA) or the AS-OCT. We also selected the ICL power using an online calculation and ordering system provided by the manufacturer based on a modified vertex formula (18 (link), 19 (link)). We usually selected a toric model ICL in eyes with manifest astigmatism of 1 D or more and a non-toric model ICL in eyes with less than 1 D.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Corneal Topography Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Topography data were obtained with Orbscan IIz (Bausch and Lomb), Lenstar LS 900 (Haag-Streit), and Cassini (i-Optics).
Orbscan IIz is a Placido-based multidimensional system that combines slit-scan and Placido ring technology, providing a complete analysis of the corneal surface, evaluating all corneal curvatures. Keratometry from the 3.0 mm zone was used to maximize comparability between devices. The Lenstar LS 900 uses 32 measuring points arranged in two concentric rings (outer 2.3 mm, inner 1.65 mm) of 16 measuring points each.12 Cassini is a topographer that uses multicolor point-to-point (up to 700) ray tracing, combined with second Purkinje Imaging Technology.13 (link) A detailed description of each topographer has been previously described.9 (link) Keratometry is measured in the 3.0 mm zone.
Calibration of all topographers was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ICL Size and Power Selection Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We determined the ICL size (12.1, 12.6, 13.2, and 13.7 mm), mainly based on the manufacturer's nomogram using the white-to-white (WTW) distance and the ACD using a scanning-slit light corneal tomographer (Orbscan, IIz, Bausch&Lomb, Rochester, USA) or an AS-OCT (CASIA, Tomey Corporation Co Ltd, Aichi, Japan). We also selected the ICL power using an online calculation and ordering system provided by the manufacturer based on a modified vertex formula (21 (link), 22 (link)). We basically selected the toric model ICL in eyes with manifest astigmatism of 1 D or more and the nontoric model ICL in eyes with astigmatism below 1 D.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Photorefractive Keratectomy Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, a total of 300 eyes of 150 patients were included. The sample size was calculated based on a type I error of 0.01 and with an assumed power of 95%. Candidates for photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) were randomized into 3 groups using computer-generated random numbers (each consisted of 100 eyes of 50 patients) and matched according to age and sex. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon, and to prevent bias, drops were given by somebody else. The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and its protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Inclusion criteria were candidates of PRK with spherical equivalent between −1 and −4 diopters (D) and central corneal thickness (CCT) of 520–560 μm based on Orbscan (OrbscanIIz, Bausch and Lomb) who signed the written consent to enter the study.
Exclusion criteria were any history of steroid induced ocular hypertension, POAG, first degree relatives of POAG, DM, glaucoma suspect, connective tissue disease, history of corticosteroid usage in the past 2 months, high baseline IOP (≥22 mmHg), any ocular condition contraindicating corticosteroid usage, and any systemic disease or medication capable of affecting IOP (i.e. hypothyroidism).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Corneal Changes During Orthokeratology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured on the logMAR scale. Keratometric readings (K) and spherical equivalent were obtained with an auto-refractometer (KR-8800, Topcon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). HOAs were measured with the Zywave® aberrometer (Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Rochester, NY, USA), and corneal topography (Orbscan IIz, Bausch & Lomb, Inc.) was also performed on all subjects. All examinations were carried out at the initial visit and repeated at 1, 3, and 6 months following the commencement of OK lens wear.
Automated refractometry (KR-8800) was used to measure curvature (K) of the central 3 mm of the cornea. It acquired three consecutive K measurements automatically, and gave us an average of K for the analysis. For corneal topography, simulated keratometric readings (Sim K) and steep K and flat K of the central cornea with a radius of 5 mm were measured for the analysis. The pupil size was measured by the Zywave® aberrometer. Zernike polynomials were used to quantitatively express the wavefront aberrations measured by the Zywave® aberrometer at 5 mm pupil size [14 (link),15 (link),16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Preoperative Ophthalmic Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preoperative assessment included manifest and cycloplegic subjective refraction and autorefraction. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity was assessed. Slit lamp biomicroscopy, mydriatic fundoscopy, and assessment of intraocular pressure and mesopic pupil diameter were performed. Preoperative slit-scan corneal topography (Orbscan IIz; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA), corneal wavefront analysis (Keratron Scout Topographer; Optikon SpA, Rome, Italy), and total ocular wavefront measurement (Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer/ORK-Wavefront Analyzer; SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) were also carried out.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Corneal Topography and Biomechanical Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Corneal topography measurement was repeated twice for each of 2,958 subjects’ right eye using Bausch & Lomb Orbscan IIz (software version 3.12). Data were analyzed for the full topographic map measurements at aperture diameter greater than 7.0mm. During the analyses, the measurements with poor repeatability (difference in Q value greater than 0.7 between two measurements) or having large dark purple or red areas (high deviation from the reference surface) were excluded. The Q value at 3.0, 5.0 and 7.0mm aperture diameters was calculated by the Pachymetry Stats program, a built-in software of the Orbscan IIz which applied the Mean Fit Method (fitting the corneal map surface to the reference surface) in calculation. The average Q values of the two repeated measurements were used as the final Q value for statistical analysis. The results included the mean corneal Q values (mean ± SD) of the anterior and posterior surfaces at different aperture diameters, the Q value distributions of the anterior and posterior surfaces at large aperture (7.0mm diameter), and analysis of the relationship between the Q values and age, sex and refractive powers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Retrospective Audit of SMILE Refractive Surgery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was a retrospective audit of consecutive eyes that underwent SMILE between March, 2012 and July, 2014, at a single tertiary referral center (Singapore National Eye Center [SNEC]). The study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, with the local institutional review board providing ethics approval.
Eyes were included if they had stable refraction for at least 6 months, no soft contact lens wear for 1 week before or rigid contact lens wear for 2 weeks before surgery, and no other ocular disease or previous ocular surgery. Patients were excluded if they had keratoconus or suspected keratoconus, active ocular or systemic disease likely to affect corneal wound healing (eg, autoimmune conditions), severe dry eyes, or a calculated postoperative corneal residual bed thickness of less than 250 μm. Patients on immunosuppression therapy were also excluded.
All eyes had a standard preoperative evaluation that included slitlamp and dilated fundus examinations, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, and corneal topography (OrbscanIIz, Bausch & Lomb). Trained refractive optometrists and technicians performed all measurements and refraction to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Ophthalmic Examination for ICL Implantation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A complete ophthalmic examination was performed before ICL implantation. The examination included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit lamp examination, fundus examination, Goldmann applanation tonometry, manifest refraction and specular microscopy (SP-8000; Konan Medical, Inc., Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan). In addition, UBM (HiScan; Optikon, Rome, Italy) with a 35-MHz producer was performed to measure the STS [12 (link)] and the distance between the sulcus-to-sulcus plane and the anterior crystalline lens surface (STSL) [13 (link)] preoperatively. The mean keratometry (Km), pupil size, horizontal WTW and anterior chamber (AC) depth were measured by scanning-slit corneal topography (Orbscan IIz; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA). The AC angle and volume were measured with a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam™; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Preoperative Ocular Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preoperative assessment included manifest and cycloplegic subjective refraction and Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. Slit lamp biomicroscopy, measurement of intraocular pressure and dilated fundoscopy were performed. Preoperative scanning took place using corneal topography with an Orbscan IIz (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA), along with corneal wavefront analysis using a Keratron Scout Topographer (Optikon SpA, Rome, Italy) and total ocular wavefront measurement using a Hartmann–Shack aberrometer (ORK-Wavefront-Analyzer; Schwind, Kleinostheim, Germany). Finally, pachymetric measurements of the cornea, and the epithelium in particular, were performed using the Optovue OCT (Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!